Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 28 April 2021 11:23:44 Jon Elson wrote: > On 04/28/2021 01:53 AM, John Dammeyer wrote: > > I'm running LinuxCNC 2.7 on a PC. Which of these would I select for > > that? > > > > https://github.com/LongDirtyAnimAlf/fpcupdeluxe/releases/tag/1.8.2r > > I'm not sure you need any of

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 28 April 2021 02:53:39 John Dammeyer wrote: > I'm running LinuxCNC 2.7 on a PC. Which of these would I select for > that? > > https://github.com/LongDirtyAnimAlf/fpcupdeluxe/releases/tag/1.8.2r > > Thanks > John > Where is the README.md? > > >

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-28 Thread John Dammeyer
ailto:el...@pico-systems.com] > Sent: April-28-21 8:24 AM > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot > > On 04/28/2021 01:53 AM, John Dammeyer wrote: > > I'm running LinuxCNC 2.7 on a PC. Which of these would I select f

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-28 Thread Jon Elson
On 04/28/2021 01:53 AM, John Dammeyer wrote: I'm running LinuxCNC 2.7 on a PC. Which of these would I select for that? https://github.com/LongDirtyAnimAlf/fpcupdeluxe/releases/tag/1.8.2r I'm not sure you need any of these. Most Linux installs have fpc in their software library, it can be

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-28 Thread John Dammeyer
I'm running LinuxCNC 2.7 on a PC. Which of these would I select for that? https://github.com/LongDirtyAnimAlf/fpcupdeluxe/releases/tag/1.8.2r Thanks John ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-27 Thread Gregg Eshelman via Emc-users
KERS = Kinetic Energy Recovery System. Various means of capturing some energy during braking then using it to help accelerate out of turns. IIRC Formula 1 never fully implemented used of any KERS device due to some chassis manufacturers complaining about the difficulty and expense of cramming

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-26 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 26 April 2021 17:37:10 andrew beck wrote: > i have a friend that pulled apart a old 100+ kw vfd and collects caps. > > he has buckets of massive ones > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 9:02 AM Leonardo Marsaglia > > > wrote: > > From what I could understand gene is using something similar to

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-26 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 26 April 2021 16:47:27 andrew beck wrote: > OK gene. > > I'm all ears . Love To hear how this works. Maybe put the relevant > code here. > I'd love to Andrew, but its long, and the simplest version would be from the pi4b running the sheldon. But I just found that for the first time

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-26 Thread andrew beck
i have a friend that pulled apart a old 100+ kw vfd and collects caps. he has buckets of massive ones On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 9:02 AM Leonardo Marsaglia wrote: > From what I could understand gene is using something similar to the old > KERS used in Formula 1. I don't know if this is a common

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-26 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
From what I could understand gene is using something similar to the old KERS used in Formula 1. I don't know if this is a common practice because it's really good idea. May be the only drawback is the cost of the capacitors and that's why we don't see this approach very often. El lun., 26 abr.

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-26 Thread andrew beck
OK gene. I'm all ears . Love To hear how this works. Maybe put the relevant code here. Regards Andrew On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, 1:37 AM Gene Heskett, wrote: > On Monday 26 April 2021 08:02:34 andy pugh wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 11:19, andrew beck > wrote: > > > Still need to automate

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-26 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 26 April 2021 08:02:34 andy pugh wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 11:19, andrew beck wrote: > > Still need to automate changing ramp > > If you wanted to do it based on commanded spindle speed, then > "lincurve" would probably work. > > Alternatively, you could consider basing it on

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-26 Thread andy pugh
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 11:19, andrew beck wrote: > Still need to automate changing ramp If you wanted to do it based on commanded spindle speed, then "lincurve" would probably work. Alternatively, you could consider basing it on spindle.0.revs, noting that a threading pass is unlikely to get

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-26 Thread andrew beck
Hey everyone just a quick reply here. Jon yep I have a braking resistor. So I have the spindle accel and decel running through a limit component. Constraining rate of change. Which works quiet nice. And I am have a custom m code that increases rate of ramp when rigid tapping. So I can do

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-25 Thread Jon Elson
On 04/24/2021 05:00 AM, andrew beck wrote: if I try rigid tap at 1000 rpm at 1mm pitch i get a over travel of about 5mm. I can reduce the deceleration ramp in the altivar 71 schiender drive to 0.5 secs and then the over travel is about one revolution of the spindle. but if i leave the

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-25 Thread Scott Harwell via Emc-users
Andrew, Is a geared head? If so what are the ratios? On Sunday, April 25, 2021, 6:30:19 AM CDT, andrew beck wrote: hey guys not sure if my emails are coming through to you guys.  hope they are. i have just successfully set up my encoder for rigid tapping using index signal from

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 25 April 2021 08:24:49 Leonardo Marsaglia wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > Is there a baking resistor installed on your drive? I think a proper > one should solve your problem and you can keep the good deceleration > rates. > > Leonardo Marsaglia > > El dom., 25 abr. 2021 08:30, andrew beck

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-25 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
Hello Andrew, Is there a baking resistor installed on your drive? I think a proper one should solve your problem and you can keep the good deceleration rates. Leonardo Marsaglia El dom., 25 abr. 2021 08:30, andrew beck escribió: > hey guys > > not sure if my emails are coming through to you

Re: [Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-25 Thread andy pugh
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 at 12:30, andrew beck wrote: > just wondering if I can maybe set use the ramp internally to linuxcnc to > give me more control Possibly, if you were to add a limit2 component to the hal. That would limit the _rate_ of speed change, not the time. It might be better done at

[Emc-users] reducing rigid tapping overshoot

2021-04-25 Thread andrew beck
hey guys not sure if my emails are coming through to you guys. hope they are. i have just successfully set up my encoder for rigid tapping using index signal from spindle motor encoder just got a few questions for the group is it possible to set different ramp values depending on spindle