I made a module named Mlink under HAL,It uses the IRQ 10 and cycle time is 1 ms.
Every time I start the emc2,it reports that unexpected time delay.
I don't know why it happened?And does it influnce the realtime thread of emc2?
Chris Radek wrote:
[probe moves]
It would be nice to be able to set tool length offset this way - but
currently there is no way to do that, since lengths need to come
from the tool table.
Hmm, I'm still mostly a newbie regarding EMC. But does the above mean
that EMC can't automatically
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
Chris Radek wrote:
[probe moves]
It would be nice to be able to set tool length offset this way - but
currently there is no way to do that, since lengths need to come
from the tool table.
Hmm, I'm still mostly a newbie
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:03:29AM -0500, Chris Radek wrote:
I don't know what the reference tool would be, and with no
reference tool I don't know what you'd use to touch-off the work.
Replying to myself! Is it as simple as
G49
insert any tool, touch off, set work coordinate system
start
Hi Chris, others.
Really tool length is just part of the problem. A tool number is
associated with both a tool length and
a tool diameter which may or may not be nominal.
So far I just grit my teeth and work thru the process. I have
considered (briefly) a procedure to normalize
the measured
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 08:27:00AM -0700, Dave Engvall wrote:
Hi Chris, others.
Really tool length is just part of the problem. A tool number is
associated with both a tool length and
a tool diameter which may or may not be nominal.
So far I just grit my teeth and work thru the process. I
Hi Chris,
You are quite correct in assuming I have a series of tool holders;
however I do a lot of one-off stuff
in which the tooling outruns the number of tool holders I have.
With the right probe and program we ought to be able to gage both
length and diameter
in a manner analogous to the
Hi Chris,
After thinking about it a bit. Are you proposing a tool referenced
against the zero tool
after every (manual) tool change? That would take time but would work
for non-tool holder machines
i.e. collet on the spindle as well as those of us with tool holders.
Might make a really nice
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 08:57:22AM -0700, Dave Engvall wrote:
Hi Chris,
After thinking about it a bit. Are you proposing a tool referenced
against the zero tool
after every (manual) tool change? That would take time but would work
for non-tool holder machines
i.e. collet on the
杜少华 wrote:
I made a module named Mlink under HAL,It uses the IRQ 10 and cycle time
is 1 ms.
Every time I start the emc2,it reports that unexpected time delay.
I don't know why it happened?And does it influnce the realtime thread of
emc2?
HAL uses periodic threads, not interrupts. I
Gentlemen,
I have started getting this message also. I start EMC and as soon
as I move an axis I get this message. I haven't tried to troubleshoot
this but if someone would like me to try or look at something on my
machine, I will.
thanks
Stuart
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:26:29AM -0500, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Gentlemen,
I have started getting this message also. I start EMC and as soon
as I move an axis I get this message. I haven't tried to troubleshoot
this but if someone would like me to try or look at something on my
machine,
Chris Radek wrote:
Even if G43 can take a tool length directly, I couldn't come up with a
straightforward way for the user to use that in gcode. Imagining the
mill case first because it's simpler: maybe you'd store in a gcode
variable the Z coordinate you get when you probe your reference
Chris Radek schrieb:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:03:29AM -0500, Chris Radek wrote:
I don't know what the reference tool would be, and with no
reference tool I don't know what you'd use to touch-off the work.
Replying to myself! Is it as simple as
G49
insert any tool, touch off, set work
Dave Engvall schrieb:
Really tool length is just part of the problem. A tool number is
associated with both a tool length and
a tool diameter which may or may not be nominal.
Right, but a tools diameter doesn't change, no matter what you do while
you insert it. However, it's felt length
I guess I don't really see the issue here with tool length and diameter
probing. Years ago now I wrote a little tickle script that allowed me
to turn the probe switch over, pressed it with the tool and from the
known height of that switch, wrote those values to the tool table and
then reread the
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:04:25PM -0500, Ray Henry wrote:
I guess I don't really see the issue here with tool length and diameter
probing. Years ago now I wrote a little tickle script that allowed me
to turn the probe switch over, pressed it with the tool and from the
known height of that
Gentlemen,
Tool length offsetting is BIG subject. It is difficult to get
people to agree on what it is and where it should be measured from.
You must determine how you are going to do it in your shop and then be
consistent with it.
I have two machines that need the tool lengths set to the
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:17:56PM -0500, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
I have a couple machines that will offset the machine as soon as
the offset is changed. These machines respond in the same manner for
g54 work center offsets and tool length offset. I don't like this type
of response. I much
Chris (and John),
Thanks for the replies, I have rather limited internet access at the moment,
so I am a little slow in responding.
I don't quite understand what you're saying. When in machine off
state, the commanded position tracks the actual position so
you can (for instance) use
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:52:13PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
Chris Radek schrieb:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:03:29AM -0500, Chris Radek wrote:
G49
insert any tool, touch off, set work coordinate system
start program
program probes first tool, THIS is the reference tool for this
21 matches
Mail list logo
