Re: [-empyre-] networked_art

2009-10-02 Thread Anna Munster
Thanks for that insight into your own motivations Helen, I look forward to also hearing from Jo about where she was coming from in terms of initiating the project. But I wanted to pick up on a couple of things in your post: You said: But, as Mizuko Ito says in her excellent introduction to

Re: [-empyre-] networked_art

2009-10-02 Thread Green Jo-Anne
Hello -empyre-, First, thanks to -empyre- and Anna Munster for providing this opportunity to talk about http://networkedbook.org. Here's a little info about my background that might shed light on what motivates me personally, and how this informs and drives my contribution to New Radio

Re: [-empyre-] networked_art

2009-10-02 Thread Johannes Birringer
dear all: happy October to all. Am i understanding your invitation to mean, Anna Helen, that we are asked to read http://networkedbook.org/ .alongside and with the empyre debate here? how many networked books/writings about networked_art are there now, five, eight? and i

Re: [-empyre-] networked_art

2009-10-02 Thread leif brush
--On Friday,Th October Nov2,21 200903 3:57 PM -0400 Green Jo-Anne j...@turbulence.org wrote: the work occupies in the production relations of its time I really heartily appreciate relating your early life experience(s). I enthusiastically support you now and agree with many thousands of

Re: [-empyre-] networked_art

2009-10-02 Thread Gabriela Vargas-Cetina
Hello. I've seen the site and love the idea. It does look like a lot of reading, but it seems to be possible to get a general feel for it quickly. Not sure in which direction you want to take the project, though. Do you want to bring together specific themes, or specific people, or specific