dear all
well, it's been announced the month's discussion is nearly or practically over,
and one already has a sense that for some reason the discussion didn't come
together,
or discussants posted and left/did not return, some returned but it felt we
were not
having a conversation, or debate on
dear all
I liked the response by Van Dyk:
The discussion is missing the simple fact that the 'greater public' are not
fooled by these bits of technology that have the potential
to overtake the body and affect a colonization that would negatively affect
their most visceral freedoms
except
dear empyreans,
As an observer of the discussion, certain of its aspects interested me
very much, for instance the notions of performance, style, and fashion
as it both captures clothing design and takes it on its line of flight;
but what, apart from a lack of time to engage, led me not to,
beautifully articulated, Simon. I totally agree
On 2 June 2011 09:12, simon s...@clear.net.nz wrote:
dear empyreans,
As an observer of the discussion, certain of its aspects interested me very
much, for instance the notions of performance, style, and fashion as it both
captures clothing
