Am 23.02.2012 10:59, schrieb Gabriel Menotti:
How efficient is this sort of symbolic camouflage to disentangle a
discipline (structures of thought, conceptual frameworks, methods)
from the hype (of the past)?
From another perspective: should the changing of names/labels (from
KYB to INF?) be
And another one...
Birringer:
PS. Lasse, what does it mean to say: I use Cybernetics to argue that interfaces are
enacted through use as much as they are the designed a priori of interaction?
please can you talk more about this argument? Are interfaces not necessarily enactive or
Dear all, thank you for your thought-provoking contributions and responses.
Will follow up.
I'll start with Magda:
Interesting point below.
Thanks for bringing up this question again. This is a hard one, and I am a
bit stuck on its language indeed, so I will reiterate it again: how do we
dear soft_skinned listeners:
thx for responses that came, will reply soon when time arrives
it just occurred to me, reading the thread-title on practice as a means
towards academic self-criticism and
Magnus's reply to Magda, that I probably have underestimated how Magda may
have intended
