--empyre- soft-skinned space--
dear soft_skinned space members
we were hoping to have many more of you becoming involved in the forum; I see
the month as a very open debate platform, where perhaps some, or many of us,
might even wonder
what virtual embodiment would
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Hei folks --
As a gadfly, I'd point you to a short text excerpted from my dissertation that
proposes a novel definition of the 'virtual' or 'virtuality'. It may be
demonstrated as directly connected with last months sonic (energy!)
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
dear John,
building the house has priority, but thanks for sending in this fascinating
excerpt you wrote on energized matter/ glass,
and flow relations to/with environment -- and I hope Douglas Kahn is still
reading --
yes things
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Good to be reminded to slow down and perhaps breathe: I have a few responses
queued up but will start with two.
When I read Sue's words around 'ersatz' movement and the price of movement
freedom in virtual systems I felt that sort of
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Hi everyone,
As far as I'm concerned, two awesome things happened in the 70s:
--Irigaray started publishing things
--Eliane Radigue started using ARPs
Parallel, in my mind, with a third awesome thing (much maligned as
essentialist):
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Hi, I'm writing in answer to Johannes' invitation, and will be somewhat
short here. I've dealt with issues of sexuality, pain, death, and mourning
in the virtual, and in the virtual in relation to the real. The points I'd
make are as
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Yes - I'm saying we are the dispositif, the system. We are that, we are defined
by that - we become what we are through that.
But the dispositif is multi-modal. It is all about how we exist in our
relations - our relations with things,
