> I wonder why you doubt the commensurabilities?
> probably you are interested in how the research you
> ask about was "written", or written down (is it up?)
> as they say, and this is course perhaps a different
> question. [Johannes Birringer]
I’m not sure if I *doubt* them. I’m just very curious
Gabriel,
so many references in your response I could not possibly engage them all...
On Feb 10, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Gabriel Menotti wrote:
>> To call anarchaeology a 'boat' would imply that he was expecting it to take
>> him somewhere, and it would seem it has. [Baruch Gottlieb]
>
> Hahah, I w
dear all
your reply is full if interesting and thought suggestions, Menotti, and
I am enjoying the discussion -
having in fact benefitted quite substantially from Zielinski's research when
our ensemble adopted
for rehearsal (on a recent choreographic work) some images and motifs
("ogypts")
> To call anarchaeology a 'boat' would imply that he was expecting it to take
> him somewhere, and it would seem it has. [Baruch Gottlieb]
Hahah, I was using the metaphor quite loosely, but your remark evokes
the story (told by Zielinski in DTotM) of how a detour/delay in a ship
voyage led Athana
dear all
sorry I am behind a day or two, need to thank Menotti for replying to my post
and giving us more
background on the past seminars on "incompatible research practices", and then
you mention, to my
surprise – but then again, i was not in Berlin – that the theme of
incompatibility (or "in
I think it is a good point to think about trendy theory and the
problems with hype.
I am almost always seduced by hype. It tricks me into seeing
something concrete to wrap my head around, while making me realize I
am a fool for mistaking currency with solidity. But the logic of hype
or its resis
On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Gabriel Menotti wrote:
>>
>> Media Archaeology is
>> thus really a fashion, something inordinately hyped to sell more books,
>> music, clothes, etc... […] Meanwhile,
>> Zielinski is always (if he still uses the label) explicitly not a media
>> archaeologist but a Me
Oi!
> Media Archaeology is
> thus really a fashion, something inordinately hyped to sell more books,
> music, clothes, etc... […] Meanwhile,
> Zielinski is always (if he still uses the label) explicitly not a media
> archaeologist but a Media (an)archaeologist, a practice which has been
> increas
