Kim Woelders wrote:
E 0.16.7 slipped out a bit too early.
Major problems:
- Window placement after restart can get messed up.
- Restarting with more than some number (16-32?) of windows on one
desktop will crash E.
Thanks Kim! I can no longer replicate these issues. Great work!!
Minor
Kim Woelders wrote:
E 0.16.7 slipped out a bit too early.
Major problems:
- Window placement after restart can get messed up.
- Restarting with more than some number (16-32?) of windows on one
desktop will crash E.
Thanks Kim! I can no longer replicate these issues. Great work!!
Minor
Heya
Kim Woelders wrote:
E 0.16.7 slipped out a bit too early.
[snip]
Is anybody aware of any other serious bugs?
I've got some pager issues that've been bothering me for a little while
related to snapshot drawing. Still appear to be there with latest CVS +
recent imlib2. Not a terrible deal,
On 11.08.2004 01:21:02, Julien Portalier wrote:
I can't reproduce the above bug, but i'm experiencing a strange
behavior when upgrading from 0.16.6 to 0.16.7 : I lose every menus
(when clicking on the desktop) on a fresh install (meaning i removed
~/.enlightenment).
The problem is even
Hi,
I want to extend the Evas_Smart callbacks (object_add, object_delete,
object_raise etc) by void *udata, for various reasons ;)
Any objections?
--
Regards,
Tilman
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
The preferred method of passing data to these functions is via the smart
objects data field ( evas_object_smart_data_{set|get} )
Create a struct with any data your smart object needs, the set the data.
That way it is included with the object at all times, and doesn't need
to be passed
After updating to the latest edje, I noticed some strange behavior
regarding edje redraws after certain state changes.
For example:
Open up elicit's winter.eet
Click on the dropper button
Release the mouse button without moving the mouse
Move the mouse
The button does not redraw into its
JMG wrote:
On 11.08.2004 01:21:02, Julien Portalier wrote:
I can't reproduce the above bug, but i'm experiencing a strange
behavior when upgrading from 0.16.6 to 0.16.7 : I lose every menus
(when clicking on the desktop) on a fresh install (meaning i removed
~/.enlightenment).
The problem
On Tuesday, 10 August 2004, at 22:26:38 (+0200),
Kim Woelders wrote:
E 0.16.7 slipped out a bit too early.
Major problems:
- Window placement after restart can get messed up.
- Restarting with more than some number (16-32?) of windows on one
desktop will crash E.
Minor problems:
-
On Wednesday, 11 August 2004, at 03:26:53 (-0700),
Ben Rockwood wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only entity outside of the project
that has adopted/reported 0.16.7 is Gentoo.
Incorrect. First off, I happen to know other distros (caos/CentOS,
for example) using 0.16.7. But even so,
On Wednesday, 11 August 2004, at 21:19:21 (+0200),
Kim Woelders wrote:
I believe the E16 debian personal build files are currently
unmaintained. Unless somebody objects I will commit this.
Wasn't sytse doing those?
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ [EMAIL
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:19:21PM +0200, Kim Woelders wrote:
Thanks!
I believe the E16 debian personal build files are currently
unmaintained. Unless somebody objects I will commit this.
/Kim
ljlane usually updates these after a release. I believe he did so after 16.6,
though I doubt he'd
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 August 2004, at 21:19:21 (+0200),
Kim Woelders wrote:
I believe the E16 debian personal build files are currently
unmaintained. Unless somebody objects I will commit this.
Wasn't sytse doing those?
Nothing in e16/e/debian/ has been touched in 3-4 years.
I
What should be the next release number (I have been assuming
0.16.7.1)?
As it is a bugfix release, 0.16.7.1 (or 0.16.7.2 not to let any
confusion happen with fc2 packages) would be better.
--
Onur KucukKnowledge speaks,
onur.--.-.delipenguen.net
On Thursday, 12 August 2004, at 00:24:47 (+0300),
Onur Kucuk wrote:
As it is a bugfix release, 0.16.7.1 (or 0.16.7.2 not to let any
confusion happen with fc2 packages) would be better.
And what confusion would happen with fc2 packages?
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)
As it is a bugfix release, 0.16.7.1 (or 0.16.7.2 not to let any
confusion happen with fc2 packages) would be better.
And what confusion would happen with fc2 packages?
In http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2 there are
packages like enlightenment-0.16.7-1.fc2.i386.rpm
On Thursday, 12 August 2004, at 01:46:04 (+0300),
Onur Kucuk wrote:
In http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2 there are
packages like enlightenment-0.16.7-1.fc2.i386.rpm seems to be released
on 2004-07-23
You're confusing dots ('.') with dashes ('-'). The version number
I have to side with phormie on this one. The basic smart object
template shows off what he's talking about. I'm sure you know about
this tilman :)
* Brian Mattern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The preferred method of passing data to these functions is via the smart
objects data field (
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 06:26 am, Ben Rockwood wrote:
I never reported the release
it was announced on the mailing list / irc wasnt it ?
-mike
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 03:51 pm, Kim Woelders wrote:
The original enlightenment-0.16.7.tar.gz is contained in
enlightenment-0.16.7-1.fc2.src.rpm. I was assuming that either the
original tar.gz or the source RPM already have been spread somewhat
around and that we would rather explain why
20 matches
Mail list logo
