Re: [E-devel] e16 unchangeable keybindings

2005-06-04 Thread Greg Roth
Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > Why not put the modified bindings.cfg into ~/.e16 so they don't get > overwritten on future installations? > I'd have said that the modified binding constitutes a removal rather than an addition so it's not something I'm trying to add rather damage I'm trying to remove.

[E-devel] diffs for e_utils

2005-06-04 Thread Christopher Michael
Hello all, I have made diffs for e_utils that incorporate e_lib changes. The main.c.diff belongs to emblem. These haven't been tested as I cannot get cvs E to build currently. Please test first. devilhorns --- e17setroot.c.orig 2005-06-04 17:57:05.474798248 -0400 +++ e17setroot.c 2005-06-04

Re: [E-devel] e16 unchangeable keybindings

2005-06-04 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
Why not put the modified bindings.cfg into ~/.e16 so they don't get overwritten on future installations? On 6/4/05, Greg Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just spent an hour after updating to e16.8 trying to figure out how to > disable the ctrl-alt-a default behavior. I finally found it in the >

[E-devel] e16 unchangeable keybindings

2005-06-04 Thread Greg Roth
I just spent an hour after updating to e16.8 trying to figure out how to disable the ctrl-alt-a default behavior. I finally found it in the /usr/share/e16/config/bindings.cfg under a heading explaining how they are so well hidden to keep users from accidentally deleting them. This frustrated me. I

Re: [E-devel] e_utils in CVS doesn't compile-- It might be due to entangle!

2005-06-04 Thread Didier Casse
On 6/3/05, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, if your missing Entangle.h then I'd assume your checkout is buggered. > That file is in > cvs. Hmm it did check out here in my box too. But the weird behavior appears after trying to compile a "make dist" tarball. So something must be ch