Re: [E-devel] FOSDEM 2009 (last chance)

2008-11-11 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, David Seikel wrote: > On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:25:01 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The deadline for a dev room is shorter: december the 22nd (in 10 >> days). > > Um, it's November last I checked. December the 22nd is a lot more than > 10 days awa

Re: [E-devel] FOSDEM 2009 (last chance)

2008-11-11 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:25:01 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The deadline for a dev room is shorter: december the 22nd (in 10 > days). Um, it's November last I checked. December the 22nd is a lot more than 10 days away. Did you mean the deadline is November 22? signatu

Re: [E-devel] FOSDEM 2009 (last chance)

2008-11-11 Thread Vincent Torri
> It seems that, now, FOSDEM 2009 takes place on the 7 and 8 february > > http://www.fosdem.org/2009/node/153 > > maybe it's now urgent that we register to have a room Just a reminder. There is now some dead lines for the participation in the link above (see at the bottom). I don't know if we h

Re: [E-devel] planet?

2008-11-11 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
I emailed them. Tim requested that his blog be removed from the planet and the blogging software Ben uses does not support categories. I can remove Ben since he isn't really active in E any longer, but I'll let others voice any objections before I go ahead and remove them. Nathan On Fri, Nov 7, 2

Re: [E-devel] RFC: enlightenment_start -locked

2008-11-11 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:05 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 06:19:46 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > (sorry - travelling...) > > um - i think it's a great idea. makes sense for auto-logins like with gsm (or > if

Re: [E-devel] [e16] [patch] Iconify windows in same area

2008-11-11 Thread Pietro Cerutti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Pietro Cerutti wrote: | Kim Woelders wrote: | | On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:26:39 +0100, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | wrote: | | | |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | |> Hash: SHA512 | |> | |> Hi, | |> | |> I've heard that Windows 7 has a fe

[E-devel] [e16] [patch] do not cover dragbar on maximize

2008-11-11 Thread Pietro Cerutti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, So, here's another patch for e16, this time against its maximizing mechanism. We have a fantastic dragbar, which is really a useful feature, but oftentimes not visible because windows are maximized. This patch makes maximizing windows not hide

Re: [E-devel] Release and documentation

2008-11-11 Thread andres
El Tuesday 11 November 2008 14:28:56 Lionel ORRY escribió: > 2008/11/11 Stephane Bauland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Toma wrote: > >> Ive always been a proponent of more docs and have always tried to make > >> docs. Im down with it. > >> > >> The 0th step is creating a roadmap of what needs more docum

Re: [E-devel] Release and documentation

2008-11-11 Thread Lionel ORRY
2008/11/11 Stephane Bauland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Toma wrote: >> Ive always been a proponent of more docs and have always tried to make >> docs. Im down with it. >> >> The 0th step is creating a roadmap of what needs more documentation, >> what needs documentation revision, and how to organize all

Re: [E-devel] Release and documentation

2008-11-11 Thread Stephane Bauland
Toma wrote: > Ive always been a proponent of more docs and have always tried to make > docs. Im down with it. > > The 0th step is creating a roadmap of what needs more documentation, > what needs documentation revision, and how to organize all the > documentation. I'm agree, the good way is to have

Re: [E-devel] Release and documentation

2008-11-11 Thread Toma
Ive always been a proponent of more docs and have always tried to make docs. Im down with it. The 0th step is creating a roadmap of what needs more documentation, what needs documentation revision, and how to organize all the documentation. And instead of a 'team' as such, we could create a system

Re: [E-devel] Release and documentation

2008-11-11 Thread Amitav Mohanty
Hi I posted about this about a week ago. I am partly taking up that task. However, I will need a few more days to begin my work. Stephane Bauland wrote: > Hi all, > > This morning i was reading a guay in #e, asking for some documentation > around E itself. Maybe it could be great to create a "te

Re: [E-devel] Theme related query...

2008-11-11 Thread Viktor Kojouharov
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 11:28 +, nathan baxter wrote: > Hi all > > For the default setup within themes for DR16 Raster imposed a standard for > the theme builders to follow. I was just wondering if this is going to be > the same for dr17 as the blingbling theme and the b_and_w theme have very >

Re: [E-devel] Theme related query...

2008-11-11 Thread Toma
I think the cool thing about this, is the different structures of themes that are possible. Depending on your development cycle and methods, you can do things just the way you like. There are a few different styles Ive used, obviously the blingbling style of files for each widget, the 1 big file of

Re: [E-devel] RFC: enlightenment_start -locked

2008-11-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 06:19:46 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: (sorry - travelling...) um - i think it's a great idea. makes sense for auto-logins like with gsm (or if enrance gets one) or even more so for embedded devices - like phone/pda's etc. where the thing boots s

[E-devel] Theme related query...

2008-11-11 Thread nathan baxter
Hi all For the default setup within themes for DR16 Raster imposed a standard for the theme builders to follow. I was just wondering if this is going to be the same for dr17 as the blingbling theme and the b_and_w theme have very different layouts within the dir structure. Is one of these structur