On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:45:19 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
after first release. ie 1.0.0 (not alpha or beta). first entry will be 1.0.0
release. i think the eet changelog way is the right way - it's not a
revisioning system. we dont keep every small little thing there. we keep, as
you say, fixed to bug
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:39:54 -0500 "Nick \"Mekius_\" Hughart"
said:
> The attached patch adds a new function called ecore_con_server_name_get.
> All it does is return the name field of the given Ecore_Con_Server object.
> Since we are in this alpha state I was unsure if such an addition was
> p
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Just fyi, the alpha release of eina is broken when you try to compile some of
> the modules due to the move of eina_private.h from include/ to lib/. Whoever
> moved this should have done a test compile.
I think that now we are in alpha, before
Just fyi, the alpha release of eina is broken when you try to compile some of
the modules due to the move of eina_private.h from include/ to lib/. Whoever
moved this should have done a test compile.
--
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: Our boolean values are huge.
The attached patch adds a new function called ecore_con_server_name_get.
All it does is return the name field of the given Ecore_Con_Server object.
Since we are in this alpha state I was unsure if such an addition was
possible, but I think it can be useful. Without this I will have to store a
co
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So we are in Alpha now. This raised a question, how and when do we
> fill ChangeLog ?
> Do we start to fill them now or after the first release ?
> What do we put in them ? For Eet, I add entry in the ChangeLog
> every time I add a feature
Hi,
So we are in Alpha now. This raised a question, how and when do we
fill ChangeLog ?
Do we start to fill them now or after the first release ?
What do we put in them ? For Eet, I add entry in the ChangeLog
every time I add a feature or fix a bug present in an older release. I
don't add
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:50:38 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel)
> said:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> > e17's config files have had versions in them for YEARS now. they actually
>> > have managed to forwar
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:50:38 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel)
said:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > e17's config files have had versions in them for YEARS now. they actually
> > have managed to forward-port and upgrade many versions over the years.
> > there is even a
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> e17's config files have had versions in them for YEARS now. they actually have
> managed to forward-port and upgrade many versions over the years. there is
> even
> a major and minor version segment of the version (major versions make e t
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Mike McCormack
wrote:
> Guys, just one request:
>
> If you change the format of .edj again, please add a version number to the
> binary format
> so that you can still parse the old format, and build backwards compatibility
> into the
> code.
Just to be sure that
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:35:58 +0900 Mike McCormack
said:
> On 08/27/2010 01:37 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> >> The pre-alpha excuse won't last for much longer.
> >
> > we're not pre-alpha anymore. we WERE and your issue is that your pre-alpha
> > build edje files didn't work w
12 matches
Mail list logo
