Re: [E-devel] edevelop.slack.com experiment

On 23 March 2017 at 09:14, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:18:27 + Tom Hacohen said: > >> Heya, >> >> I personally think it's a bad idea to rely on a proprietary tool for >> open source development, and from what I remember, I'm not the

Re: [E-devel] Server Issues

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:38:10 + Andrew Williams said: > Hi, > > I kicked it again, it had been working for around 12 hours since last kick. > > Now the server is up but phab is broken. > > Honestly we have to at least mirror all this data as we now have >

Re: [E-devel] edevelop.slack.com experiment

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:18:27 + Tom Hacohen said: > Heya, > > I personally think it's a bad idea to rely on a proprietary tool for > open source development, and from what I remember, I'm not the only > one. > This is partially why we self host git and not use Github et al. >

Re: [E-devel] Work items towards 1.19

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: >> Done, there is a branch that I could compile but not test (no Windows >> machine): devs/barbieri/efl_net_socket_windows >> >>

Re: [E-devel] Phabricator is somewhat broken

I see that and I see it for task/issue pages too :( On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 at 06:58, Daniel Hirt wrote: > Some pages work, but for me revision pages ( > https://phab.enlightenment.org/D) show the following: > > >>> UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR <<< > > Call to undefined

Re: [E-devel] Server Issues

Hi, I kicked it again, it had been working for around 12 hours since last kick. Now the server is up but phab is broken. Honestly we have to at least mirror all this data as we now have infrastructural issues blocking development blocking release... Anyone know if phab or php got upgraded in

Re: [E-devel] edevelop.slack.com experiment

I've been using Slack for a couple years now for various projects, and I have to say, I love it! I know there will be a lot of old fogies who don't want to switch, but the accessibility and integrations are hard to beat! For those complaining about it not being open source, there is an OSS

Re: [E-devel] Work items towards 1.19

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > Done, there is a branch that I could compile but not test (no Windows > machine): devs/barbieri/efl_net_socket_windows > > >

Re: [E-devel] edevelop.slack.com experiment

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Boris Faure wrote: > On 17-03-22 12:56, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> as for comms, except the initial step of register and configure the >> irc bridge for your user, then you simple change/add a new network and >> the same channels. After that

Re: [E-devel] edevelop.slack.com experiment

On 17-03-22 12:56, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > as for comms, except the initial step of register and configure the > irc bridge for your user, then you simple change/add a new network and > the same channels. After that it's the same thing. I'll keep on using irc. I'll do that but as soon

Re: [E-devel] edevelop.slack.com experiment

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Heya, > > I personally think it's a bad idea to rely on a proprietary tool for > open source development, and from what I remember, I'm not the only > one. > This is partially why we self host git and not use Github et al.

Re: [E-devel] edevelop.slack.com experiment

I don't have very strong opinions on which service to use, but I don't plan on joining multiple services to discuss the same project. I'll remain solely in IRC until such time that the project decides to officially switch to another service. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:42 AM Tom Hacohen

Re: [E-devel] edevelop.slack.com experiment

Heya, I personally think it's a bad idea to rely on a proprietary tool for open source development, and from what I remember, I'm not the only one. This is partially why we self host git and not use Github et al. Long live IRC. https://xkcd.com/1782/ -- Tom On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:52 PM,

Re: [E-devel] edevelop.slack.com experiment

Hey list, On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 07:46 +1030, Simon Lees wrote: > > On 03/22/2017 01:22 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm doing an experiment with slack.com as IRC alternative. I'm no > > expert in slack, first time I ever used, if you have more > > experience > > let

Re: [E-devel] Work items towards 1.19

Done, there is a branch that I could compile but not test (no Windows machine): devs/barbieri/efl_net_socket_windows https://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/log/?h=devs/barbieri/efl_net_socket_windows People that know windows API and could debug it please help. Look for the TODO. Vincent may

Re: [E-devel] EFL 1.19.0-beta3 (from git) package for Debian Experimental

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote: [...] > Oh I see - I misunderstood your previous message and thought you were > targeting sid. You need to backport + rebuild for jessie. IIRC, the > only change I needed was to remove the auto dbgsym stuff. > > [snip] >>

[E-devel] Server Issues

Am sure this might be known, but I’ll mention anyway: 3 days now have had server issues intermittently, this morning (GMT) server is over capacity and unusable. Thanks Sent from Mail for Windows 10 -- Check out the

[E-devel] Phabricator is somewhat broken

Some pages work, but for me revision pages ( https://phab.enlightenment.org/D) show the following: >>> UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR <<< Call to undefined method PhabricatorPolicyFilter::canInteract()