Re: [e-users] spurious underlines in terminology

2023-03-27 Thread Boris Faure
Hi, I think I have fixed it this weekend in bbcedcb95f09e8136dc6dea702e22fe617a318e5. Have a nice week, -- Boris Faure Pointer Arithmetician ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [e-users] spurious underlines in terminology

2023-03-25 Thread Boris Faure
On 23-03-22 08:53, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Hi folks, > > Has anyone else seen spurious underlining in terminology v1.13.0? I've > seen it rarely when scrolling up and down in the scrollback buffer but > haven't been able to reproduce it. > > I got