The Linux versions of Firefox have been named differently ("x86_64" vs
"i686") for a long time, so it should be easy enough to name the Windows
versions.
I made a script some years ago to download both the Linux and Windows
versions (plus their checksums and its signature) all at once from their
El 4/11/19 a les 16:12, James Pearson ha escrit:
P.S. I'm still a bit confused about 'sideloading' - as the Blog post
says the change will be with Firefox 73/74 - but I can't seem to enable
'sideloading' with ESR 68 - i.e. want to be able to load named
extensions from a central location
Maybe "deployment" is easier in some sense, but the massive change
introduced by Quantum, which annihilated a large number of add-ons, has
made it impossible to return to Firefox's previous functionality and
usability (esp. the user interface). Thus the new state of affairs is
that, although it's
I'm guessing if you're deploying policies as policies.json you probably
can template it in your configuration management tool. I find this is
where erb templates shine in puppet for instance.
--
James Pulver
CLASSE Computer Group
Cornell University
On 11/4/19 6:30 AM, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
>
I’ve attached the issue/email I reported earlier but unfortunately did not have
the bandwidth to pursue it further.
I did create however create a ticket with our IDP but they were able to
reproduce the issue with another third party IDP and so we dropped the issue
altogether. Since then, we
What specific problems did you encounter? Did you open or find bugs in
bugzilla for them?
Mike
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 3:14 AM Samuel Ambaye
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Yes. We also had to temporarily set the value to false to avoid a few
> issues (SSO, capability.policy.policynames, start up errors).
Just created one for Thunderbird too:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1593748
On Mon Nov 04 2019 12:09:41 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl
wrote:
> I just did because this has been annoying me for a while too...
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1593740
>
I just did because this has been annoying me for a while too...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1593740
Is there a way to desigate this one to both Firefox and Thunderbird? Or
do I need to create one for Thunderbird too?
On Mon Nov 04 2019 09:39:49 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time),
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
The thing that is going away is the concept of sideloading where you put
extensions in a central location and they get loaded into Firefox and the user
can't remove them (they can only disable them).
You will still be able to put extensions into distribution/extensions
We have no plans to remove them from the current ESR which will be
supported until mid to late 2020.
The current plan is to remove them completely in March 2020, so it is
unlikely they will be in the next ESR.
Hi Mike,
could you please add this setting as a preference setting into GPO.
Thanks,
Sascha
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
Hello,
Would it be possible to name the installation files for the download so
that you can see what you have in front of you ?
The x86 and x64 bit files all have the same name. This is misleading if
you have to maintain both versions in your system.
Regards, Sirko
--
Dipl.-Ing.(FH) Sirko
Mandi! Mike Kaply
In chel di` si favelave...
> The thing that is going away is the concept of sideloading where you put
> extensions in a central location and they get loaded into Firefox and the user
> can't remove them (they can only disable them).
> You will still be able to put extensions
13 matches
Mail list logo
