On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Kris Kowal kris.ko...@cixar.com wrote:
Supposing that aQuery and bQuery are implemented by independent
uncoordinated authors.
aQuery.js
module $ {
}
bQuery.js
module $ {
}
If my interpretation is correct, these cannot be combined in a
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Kris Kowal kris.ko...@cixar.com wrote:
...
Most of this is good clarification, particularly that load
interacts with the exports of the foreign script's implied,
anonymous module scope.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:35, Kris Kowal kris.ko...@cixar.com wrote:
Another thing that Ihab clarified which merits a full
section on the wiki is the dynamic scoping of lexical module
names.
This is a common misconception. Simple modules is using static lexical
scoping, not dynamic scoping.
It would be
good for this to be expressed in one of the examples, and
for it to be clarified in the description of semantics that
every script is also an anonymous module from which the
exports are only accessible through the lexical scope
shadowing (I assume) and by being bound to a module
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Erik Arvidsson
erik.arvids...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:35, Kris Kowal kris.ko...@cixar.com wrote:
Another thing that Ihab clarified which merits a full
section on the wiki is the dynamic scoping of lexical module
names.
This is a common
5 matches
Mail list logo
