I don't think we need to add any syntax sugar for the examples below.Answering with examples inline:17.11.2014, 03:07, “Biju” bijumaill...@gmail.com: I wish, I could write elegant two of the code pattern I use frequently.Patten 1.HTML button click event handler should always return false (ie,
On 17 November 2014 17:29, Alex Kocharin a...@kocharin.ru wrote:
17.11.2014, 03:07, “Biju” bijumaill...@gmail.com:
I wish, I could write elegant two of the code pattern I use frequently.
[...]
Patten 2.
I do like to code functions with early exit, like
function someValidationProcess(){
`validate: { ... }`
Is that an ES7 feature? I don't recognize it from ES6, and can't seem to
find a relevant proposal with that syntax...
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Andreas Rossberg rossb...@google.com
wrote:
On 17 November 2014 17:29, Alex Kocharin a...@kocharin.ru wrote:
17.11.2014,
OH JEEZ. Please ignore previous email.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Jeremy Martin jmar...@gmail.com wrote:
`validate: { ... }`
Is that an ES7 feature? I don't recognize it from ES6, and can't seem to
find a relevant proposal with that syntax...
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:51 AM,
On Nov 16, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Tom Van Cutsem wrote:
2014-11-17 3:34 GMT+01:00 Frankie Bagnardi f.bagna...@gmail.com:
Consider when Array.isArray would be used. In my experience, checks to see
if something is an array are used for:
- deciding how to iterate it (for(;;) vs for..in, for
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
```js
Array[Symbol.isArray]] = true; //note, this is a constructor
property, not an Array.prototype property.
Minomer, then -- how about Symbol.isArrayClass?
we also change Array.prototype.concat to do the above Array.isArray
test instead of using
Is this something what is ready for discussion on a meeting (in particular,
tomorrow's meeting)?
Regardless, whether the `map` and `set` will be directly on the
`Map.prototype` or on some generic `%CollectionPrototype%`, the user-level
API will stay the same, right? And will be used as:
```
Dmitry Soshnikov wrote:
Is this something what is ready for discussion on a meeting (in
particular, tomorrow's meeting)?
You put something on the agenda, cool.
https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/master/2014/11.md
/be
___
es-discuss mailing list
On Nov 17, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
```js
Array[Symbol.isArray]] = true; //note, this is a constructor property, not
an Array.prototype property.
Minomer, then -- how about Symbol.isArrayClass?
perhaps, I have a negative reaction to including the
On Nov 17, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
On Nov 17, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
```js
Array[Symbol.isArray]] = true; //note, this is a constructor property, not
an Array.prototype property.
Minomer, then -- how about
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
if (isProxy(obj)) return isArray(getProxyTarget(obj));
//Array.isArray(new Proxy(Object.create(Array.prototype), {}))
//I'm not sure that the above line is really a compat. issue. I'd
prefer to leave it out.
Please do -- it contradicts the righteous
On 17 November 2014 11:29, Alex Kocharin a...@kocharin.ru wrote:
If you do the same stuff after each function, some functional programming
could help:
function someValidationProcess() {
;[doStuff, doAnotherStuff, doYetAnotherStuff, doMoreStuff]
.forEach(function(fn) {
fn()
2014-11-17 18:30 GMT+01:00 Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com:
But probing through the proxy as has been proposed is a terrible violation
of the MOP API boundary and isn't generalizable to other built-ins that are
dependent upon internal state. While a null handler proxy on a direct
On 11/16/14, Biju bijumaill...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Proposal:
I wish there was some syntax sugar like
function someClickHandler(){
doStuff();
doAnotherStuff();
doYetAnotherStuff();
} finally {
return false;
}
function rf() {
try {
throw-an-error;
} finally {
14 matches
Mail list logo
