Re: %TypedArray%.prototype(s)?

2015-07-23 Thread Allen Wirfs-Brock
On Jul 23, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Keith Miller wrote: I would like to verify my reading of the %TypedArray% Object from the es6 spec. It seems from 22.2.1 that there is a single intrinsic object/prototype that each constructor/instance inherits from, respectively. Each of the nine concrete

Re: await on synchronous functions

2015-07-23 Thread Andreas Rossberg
On 17 July 2015 at 23:39, Mark S. Miller erig...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote: If I might, if there's one thing that has never particularly shone in JS, that is consistency. I see only two possibilities here: 1) it

Re: Re: [Meta] Proposal: Switch es-discuss from a mailing list to using the TC39 GitHub issue tracker for discussion.

2015-07-23 Thread Brandon Andrews
Personal note: If you must kill es-discuss and move it, move it to medium that is not political, that is, not to github. Github has recently made a move that pushes me to leave it as soon as I find suitable alternative. The recent changes with the open code of conduct shouldn't affect

Re: standardizing Error.stack or equivalent

2015-07-23 Thread Mark S. Miller
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Mark S. Miller erig...@google.com wrote: [+google-caja-discuss] Cool. I will fix the debug.js adaptor a) to fix the bug Boris reported, b) to map the FF nested format to the v8 nested format, and c) to preserve this information from the v8 API so that it

Re: %TypedArray%.prototype(s)?

2015-07-23 Thread Claude Pache
Le 23 juil. 2015 à 21:22, Keith Miller kmille...@gmail.com a écrit : Is this the correct reading of the spec? If so, I believe this goes against the current implementation in Safari, Chrome, Firefox, and IE, which have distinct prototypes for each element type. FYI, Firefox does

Re: await on synchronous functions

2015-07-23 Thread Dean Landolt
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Andreas Rossberg rossb...@google.com wrote: On 17 July 2015 at 23:39, Mark S. Miller erig...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote: If I might, if there's one thing that has never

%TypedArray%.prototype(s)?

2015-07-23 Thread Keith Miller
I would like to verify my reading of the %TypedArray% Object from the es6 spec. It seems from 22.2.1 that there is a single intrinsic object/prototype that each constructor/instance inherits from, respectively. Relevant text: “The %TypedArray% intrinsic object is a constructor function object

NativeError Introductory Text Error?

2015-07-23 Thread Thomas Wood
Hi all, I believe there to be an error in the introductory text for ES6 19.5.6: NativeError Object Structure, it was also present in the text for ES5.1 and I believe it is a hang-over from ES3. 19.5.6 reads: [...] Each of these objects has the structure described below, differing only in the

[Meta] Proposal: Switch es-discuss from a mailing list to using the TC39 GitHub issue tracker for discussion.

2015-07-23 Thread Brandon Andrews
I was looking at the most recent notes. https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2015-05-27 One thing stuck out to me is that ECMA uses GitHub a lot. There was a line that caught my attention: ?: What needs to live on the ECMA GitHub? Waldemar Horwat/Allen Wirfs-Brock: Any contributions need to be in

Re: [Meta] Proposal: Switch es-discuss from a mailing list to using the TC39 GitHub issue tracker for discussion.

2015-07-23 Thread Herby Vojčík
Brandon Andrews wrote: I was looking at the most recent notes. https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2015-05-27 One thing stuck out to me is that ECMA uses GitHub a lot. There was a line that caught my attention: ?: What needs to live on the ECMA GitHub? Waldemar Horwat/Allen Wirfs-Brock: Any