Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-18 Thread Andrea Giammarchi
Accordingly with this ecma262 stage 0 summary https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/stage0.md the (quite long time ago) discussed `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors` https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/9353781 hasn't move a bit from there. However, there are already use cases

Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-18 Thread Mathias Bynens
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > Accordingly with this ecma262 stage 0 summary > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/stage0.md the (quite long time > ago) discussed `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors` >

Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-18 Thread Andrea Giammarchi
Thanks Mathias. Do you (or anyone else) know if that should be filed as a PR to tc39/ecma262 or if it should just be a repository eventually posted in here? On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Mathias Bynens wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Andrea Giammarchi >

Re: Re: Capturing groups with a quantifier in look-behind assertions should capture the leftmost substring matched by that group or the rightmost one?

2016-01-18 Thread Simon Pieters
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:49:13 +0100, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: FWIF `RegExp.$1` and others are de-facto standard and removing them would break the Web and much more. Indeed. These are currently "specified" at https://javascript.spec.whatwg.org/#regexp.$n I

Missing PrepareForTailCall in Function.prototype.apply

2016-01-18 Thread Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă
Done, thanks. ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Missing PrepareForTailCall in Function.prototype.apply

2016-01-18 Thread Allen Wirfs-Brock
This looks like a spec. bug, to me. > On Jan 16, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă > wrote: > > If apply > (http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-function.prototype.apply >

Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-18 Thread Mathias Bynens
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > Do you (or anyone else) know if that should be filed as a PR to tc39/ecma262 > or if it should just be a repository eventually posted in here? It should be a repository that can eventually move to the tc39

Missing PrepareForTailCall in Function.prototype.apply

2016-01-18 Thread Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă
I would file a bug, but I forgot my bugzilla password and bugzilla doesn't send me the email to reset the password. ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Missing PrepareForTailCall in Function.prototype.apply

2016-01-18 Thread Allen Wirfs-Brock
It should be filed as an issue at https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues > On Jan 18, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă > wrote: > > I would file a bug, but I forgot my bugzilla password and bugzilla doesn't > send me