Bradford,
Take a look at the tests that I wrote for that syntax, I think they will be
helpful in understand what that syntax actually is:
https://github.com/tc39/test262/blob/master/test/language/expressions/exponentiation/exp-operator-precedence-unary-expression-semantics.js#L34-L66
Rick
On
Ah thanks, that explains what's going on there then.
On 20/07/2016 17:06, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Jon
> Coppeard
>
>
>> OK, so calling EnqueueJob with a TopLevelModuleEvaluationJob is how this is
>> supposed to happen.
>>
There is probably no way to make the `super` semantics just work in all use
cases. But I think that the choice made in ES6 is the right one in order to
have it correctly working in the most naïve (and maybe the most common?) use
cases of method borrowing, i.e., when you don’t have knowledge of
/#!/JoePea wrote
> Is there any hard evidence of the performance cost of a dynamic super? So
> far I've read in various places (for example the thread linked to by
> @medikoo, Axel's 2ality article on super) about there being "overhead",
> but
> the articles haven't quantified or put into
4 matches
Mail list logo
