On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Erik Arvidsson
erik.arvids...@gmail.com wrote:
Another thing to consider is whether these functions belong in an iter
module or in a reflect module? I'm leaning towards the letter.
I completely agree.
for-of should be the tool for iterating over collections.
To address Allen's original question:
I think the Map and Set classes in Harmony mean that not all
structured data is stored as object properties. I think that's a good
thing.
However it does mean that we must have a separation of concerns between
- iterating over a collection
- object
On Nov 15, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Jason Orendorff wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Erik Arvidsson
erik.arvids...@gmail.com wrote:
Another thing to consider is whether these functions belong in an iter
module or in a reflect module? I'm leaning towards the letter.
I completely agree.
On Nov 12, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
The Iterators proposal includes the definition
(http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:iterators#standard_api ) of
functions that are intended to support various common
On Nov 14, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
The Iterators proposal includes the definition
(http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:iterators#standard_api ) of
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:07, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
Another possibility would be to build in default @iterator methods on
Object.prototype and Array.prototype. I'd probably make the object
implementation be an items for enumerable properties and the array
On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:07, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com
wrote:
Another possibility would be to build in default @iterator methods on
Object.prototype and Array.prototype. I'd probably make the object
implementation be an
Another thing to consider is whether these functions belong in an iter
module or in a reflect module? I'm leaning towards the letter.
On Nov 12, 2011 12:05 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Nov 12, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
The Iterators proposal includes the
On Nov 13, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
Another thing to consider is whether these functions belong in an iter module
or in a reflect module? I'm leaning towards the letter.
Does it matter, apart from the name?
I'd rather have more and more precisely defined modules than one
The Iterators proposal includes the definition
(http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:iterators#standard_api ) of
functions that are intended to support various common iteration patterns.
For example,
for ((k of keys(x)) { ...}
for (v of values(x)) { ...}
for ([k,v] of
On Nov 12, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
The Iterators proposal includes the definition
(http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:iterators#standard_api ) of
functions that are intended to support various common iteration patterns.
For example,
for ((k of
11 matches
Mail list logo
