Clarification for derived promises

-promise.resolve) 2. `p2` is an instance of `MyPromise` that is resolved with a promise value of 42. Thanks! -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org

Re: Clarification for derived promises

Awesome, thank you! -N On 7/14/2015 10:12 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: Yes. On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:10 AM -0700, Nicholas C. Zakas standa...@nczconsulting.com mailto:standa...@nczconsulting.com wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to wrap my head around derived promises and wanted to ask

@@toStringTag spoofing for null and undefined

-- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Question regarding duplicate __proto__ properties

-- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Retrieving generator references

Thanks all. My intent wasn't to propose that something was necessary, just to ask if something was available that I was missing. I'll dig in on the await spec and take a good look at the various examples everyone provided. Thanks! ___ es-discuss

Retrieving generator references

generators, iterators, and functions.) -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: My ECMAScript 7 wishlist

). -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: My ECMAScript 7 wishlist

using feature detection on. I still wish for some way to do this other than through proxies, but I agree that it would be nice for just the object provider to be able to set this behavior. -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net

My ECMAScript 7 wishlist

. -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Using destructuring for function arguments

the function body. Am I reading this correctly? -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Using destructuring for function arguments

a default value to a destructured parameter, Firefox or Traceur? 2. Is the behavior of not having any bindings for destructured parameter properties correct? And if so, is it desirable? Thanks. -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net

Formalize error.stack?

itself to formal definition. Is this a spec oversight or is the exclusion intentional? Thanks. -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo

Re: Object.define == Object.mixin??

-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

[Map|Set|WeakMap].prototype.isEmpty()?

(maybe Array and String, too?). It seems to go along nicely with the clear() method on Map, Set, and WeakMap. -N -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https

Re: Sets plus JSON

or subsystems fighting over who gets control of the single implementation of Set.prototype.toJSON That doesn't necessarily preclude a logical default, correct? -N -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing

Re: Sets plus JSON

On 10/4/2012 11:30 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: On Oct 4, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Nicholas C. Zakas wrote: On 10/3/2012 4:44 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: (oops, forgot to reply-all) Begin forwarded message: *From: *Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com mailto:al...@wirfs-brock.com *Date

Sets plus JSON

() would do something rational by default when used with sets. Thoughts? Thanks, Nicholas -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es

Re: Sets plus JSON

list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Suggestions for Set

On 10/1/2012 6:43 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: Nicholas C. Zakas wrote: I've been playing around with the Set prototypes in Firefox and Chrome (knowing full well that they are incomplete and the spec hasn't been finalized yet), and I wanted to share a couple of learnings. Thanks! First, since

Suggestions for Set

as a replacement for objects that I was using for the same purpose. Thanks, Nicholas -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Improved Function.prototype.toString in ES6?

-- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Clarification on let/const

to a declared constant would throw an error (in that it behaves similar to a non-writable property in strict mode)? const MAX_ITEMS = 30; MAX_ITEMS = 25;// error? Is that correct? Thanks, Nicholas -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net

Re: New Object Extension Literal Strawman

wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas C. Zakas standa...@nczconsulting.com wrote: Is it intentional that the first example uses colons between the property and value while all others use the equals sign? Yes this is intentional. We discussed this a bit at the F2F meeting and we came

Re: New Object Extension Literal Strawman

PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas C. Zakas standa...@nczconsulting.com wrote: Is it intentional that the first example uses colons between the property and value while all others use the equals sign? Yes this is intentional. We discussed this a bit

Re: New Object Extension Literal Strawman

that such feedback would be welcomed rather than eschewed. Allen ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net

Re: Globalization API holiday summary

. Keeping locales separate removes the conflict. 5a. Instead of DateTimeFormat(locList, options) have DateTimeFormat(options), where options hold locale info. Did I miss anything? -- Nebojša Ćirić -- Nebojša Ćirić -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http

Re: Globalization API - Sample Use Cases

be allowed as either a string or an object. If a string, then treat as a pattern, otherwise, treat as an options object. -N 02. децембар 2011. 13.28, Nicholas C. Zakas standa...@nczconsulting.com mailto:standa...@nczconsulting.com је написао/ла: Instead of continuing with the previous

Re: Globalization API - Sample Use Cases

Ćirić -- ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Globalization API - Sample Use Cases

. Formatting strings make this trivial, needing to code up an object literal makes this trickier (JSON is not a great format for config files). Just a few extra cents. -N ___ Nicholas C. Zakas http://www.nczonline.net ___ es-discuss

Re: Globalization API Feedback - moar!

On 11/30/2011 12:01 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Nicholas C. Zakas wrote: The reason I started down this path is because the API, as currently designed, doesn't fit in with the rest of the JavaScript core language. Just to summarize some of my earlier points: 1

Re: Globalization API Feedback - moar!

that is passed into new instances of NumberFormat and DateFormat all the time (that's a bunch of housekeeping for developers). Thoughts? -Nicholas On 11/21/2011 11:12 AM, Nicholas C. Zakas wrote: As promised, more verbose feedback for the Globalization API. My general feeling

Re: Globalization API: supportedLocalesOf vs. getSupportedLocales

is on the locale list passed in? Or is there a more fundamental issue with getSupportedLocales? Thanks, Norbert On Nov 21, 2011, at 11:12 , Nicholas C. Zakas wrote: 2. supportedLocalesOf I find this method name strange - I've read it several

Globalization API Feedback

As promised, more verbose feedback for the Globalization API. My general feeling is that the API is overly verbose for what it's doing. I'll state my bias up front: I'm not a fan of introducing a bunch of new types to handle formatting. I'd much rather have additional methods that perform