Hi Ken and other EUG-LUG and CPSR members,
I first posted this to EUG-LUG (Eugene Linux Users Group) because I
think the technical issues here may be beyond EFN's knowledge base when
we start talking about Bayesian probability of spam. With this second
posting, I'm also reaching out to the
I get the impression that when I forward a message (headers
expanded) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it sets my Baysian filter up, and anything it
sees that looks like this message gets a spam rating based on its
similarity to the forwarded message. Do repeated messages which fail the
test add to
Unfortunately not everyone is as diligent as ed, someone has to at
least glance
at every message going through the spam queue to make sure it's not
someone
asking for support or berating us for the fact that SA missed one and
was overenthusiastic
about another.
We do keep a big directory of
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:12:13PM -0800, Marc Baber wrote:
Could anyone on this list explain what Bayesian spam probability means
in the context of SpamAssassin? Some spam filters use locally defined
filtering rules and some are augmented with remote databases of known
spam messages (such
Cory Petkovsek wrote:
snip
Didn't Roger and Larry say they only tag messages and leave filtering to
the end user? So what's everyone's beef?
Cory
my beef is simple ease of reading. sure, I can still read the message
after its been tagged spam, but its a pain, and I still have to wade
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:59:41AM -0800, Edward Craig wrote:
I get the impression that when I forward a message (headers
expanded) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it sets my Baysian filter up, and anything it
sees that looks like this message gets a spam rating based on its
similarity to the
