Nobody not under a non-disclosure agreement signed with SCO has
yet determined any of the code in question.
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Bob Crandell wrote:
Has anybody actually seen this alleged code? If it's decades old,
except for FUD, what's the point?
Darren Hayes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:09 PM
To: The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list
Subject: Re: [eug-lug]Red Hat files suit against SCO
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:07:45AM -0700, Edward Craig wrote:
Nobody not under a non-disclosure agreement signed with SCO has
: Joseph Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:09 PM
To: The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list
Subject: Re: [eug-lug]Red Hat files suit against SCO
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:07:45AM -0700, Edward Craig wrote:
Nobody not under a non
Has anybody actually seen this alleged code? If it's decades old, except for FUD,
what's the point?
Darren Hayes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
http://news.com.com/2100-7252_3-5059547.html
___
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
