On 20040217.0058, Bob Crandell said ...
2) You will notice autolearn=no on the last line. How do I make it say
autolearn=yes ? BTW, the score doesn't make any difference here.
Look in 'man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf'
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam n.nn(default: 12.0)
The score
Rob Hudson wrote:
On 20040217.0058, Bob Crandell said ...
2) You will notice autolearn=no on the last line. How do I make it say
autolearn=yes ? BTW, the score doesn't make any difference here.
Look in 'man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf'
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam n.nn(default:
Wanted email = Ham
Unwanted email = spam
The default threshold for autolearn is = 12 for spam, = .1 for ham.
You can lower it in your user configuration file:
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
Ham?
___
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:58:06AM +, Bob Crandell wrote:
[spam headers]
There are 2 issues here I would like help with.
1) The Subject line has **SPAM*:. This is from a server that is upstream.
It tags messages before it passes them on. I have a procmail receipe on my
box that says:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 05:39:33PM -0800, john fleming wrote:
Ham?
Good point, it's not a very good name.
Tofu would probably be more correct, given that tofu is 100% the opposite
of spam.
___
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I beg to differ, as both are food products; in other words, neither are
found as-is in nature (as opposed to raw muscle tissue).
Opposite is a risky word. = )
many regards, and the opposite of offense to y'all,
Ben
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:10:55 -0800
T. Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That all depends what part of the country you're from. Down
south they see tofu and say what's that?. Then you come up to
the northwest and it's the same response to SPAM.
:)
--- T. Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 05:39:33PM -0800, john fleming wrote:
Tofu
Rob Hudson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 20040217.0058, Bob Crandell said ...
2) You will notice autolearn=no on the last line. How do I make it say
autolearn=yes ? BTW, the score doesn't make any difference here.
Look in 'man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf'
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam
