Re: advice needed for Star Trek talk

2010-12-20 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Dec 2010, at 18:29, ronaldheld wrote: Jason I would think normally the implant should work as well. Being Bajorean, could the missing essence be the influence of the Prophets? Data and the EMH should be able to pass the Turing test. Maybe I am missing something. A matter human in a

Re: advice needed for Star Trek talk

2010-12-20 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 20 Dec 2010, at 03:15, Jason Resch wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: But then a digital machine cannot see the difference between its brain emulated by a physical device, of by the true existence of the proof of the Sigma_1 relation

is the Brain in a superfluid state? Physics of Consciousness

2010-12-20 Thread ronaldheld
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1012/1012.3765v1.pdf I saw this and thought, Bruno. Ronald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: advice needed for Star Trek talk

2010-12-20 Thread Jason Resch
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: On 20 Dec 2010, at 03:15, Jason Resch wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: But then a digital machine cannot see the difference between its brain emulated by a physical

Re: advice needed for Star Trek talk

2010-12-20 Thread Brent Meeker
On 12/20/2010 3:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 20 Dec 2010, at 03:15, Jason Resch wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: But then a digital machine cannot see the difference between its brain emulated by a