On 12/22/2012 10:02 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:50 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/22/2012 5:10 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:48 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:00 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/22/2012 10:02 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:50 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/22/2012 5:10 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:48 PM, meekerdb
Hi Jason Resch
You're right.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/23/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Jason Resch
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-22, 14:16:52
Subject: Re: How visual images are
Roger,
Don't you believe you already have eternal life.
I do and I am not even Christian.
Richard
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal and all,
Do you not realize that 1p far enough into the past (presumably accessible
to time travel),
On 22 Dec 2012, at 11:58, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Thanks very much. Then could we not simply continue your train of
thought
to say that
1) all universal Turing machines require an extraneous
UTM to interpret them, etc. etc. etc.
That's why we have to assume at least one.
On 22 Dec 2012, at 22:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/22/2012 11:56 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
Deutsch et al. have solved the probability problem.
I don't think so. If you are referring to his decision analysis, it
only seems to work for simple binary choices - QM predicts
probabilities that
On 23 Oct 2012, at 08:03, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/22/2012 11:35 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 10/22/2012 6:05 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
I don't understand why you're focusing on NP-hard problems... NP-
hard problems are
solvable algorithmically... but not efficiently. When I read you
(I'm
On 26 Oct 2012, at 21:19, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/26/2012 6:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Well, in defense of Craig, or of the devil, this has not been
proved. The problem occurs, or at least is easy to prove only
when we make the digital assumption. This entails a truncation of
the subject,
On 26 Oct 2012, at 21:22, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/26/2012 6:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Oct 2012, at 18:57, meekerdb wrote:
Good points. The contrast is usually qualia-v-quanta. I think
color can be communicated and we have an RGB language for doing
so that makes it more quanta
On 28 Nov 2012, at 17:42, meekerdb wrote:
On 11/28/2012 2:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The question though is how does that happen?
Actually comp is better than physics here. in physics we don't know
why and how electron obey the SWE. It is the ureasonable use of
math in physics. With
On 13 Dec 2012, at 20:33, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/13/2012 9:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
So I have no conflicts with science as long as I keep in mind what
kind of truth is referred to.
There is one truth. Let us search it.
There are many true propositions, but I don't think they can be
Hi
It's time somebody said it. Materialism
is a cult and atheism is its gospel.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/23/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
as I said, there is no such thing as the future 1p view, there is
only a future 1p view.
But you have been duplicated.
Yes.
from your future person points of view
In a world of duplicating machines there is no
Hi
On 23 Dec 2012, at 18:46, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi
It's time somebody said it. Materialism
is a cult and atheism is its gospel.
Not necessarily. You can also see it as an assumption in need of
clarification. Or as a theory in need of a refutation.
But historically you are right, the
On 12/23/2012 11:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Oct 2012, at 21:19, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/26/2012 6:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Well, in defense of Craig, or of the devil, this has not been
proved. The problem occurs, or at least is easy to prove only when
we make the digital assumption.
On 12/23/2012 8:29 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Oct 2012, at 21:22, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/26/2012 6:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Oct 2012, at 18:57, meekerdb wrote:
Good points. The contrast is usually qualia-v-quanta. I think color can be
communicated and we have an RGB language
16 matches
Mail list logo
