Re: Is the Continuum Hypothesis a) really true or really false, or b) something else ?

The answer is right in front of us. Quantum collapse indicates that a photon must pass through a slit, and become either a wave or a particle. But the answer gets more complex, with Wigner's 4 body solution, with the photons becoming either Yanny or Laurel, as opposed to Alice and Bob.

Re: Is the Continuum Hypothesis a) really true or really false, or b) something else ?

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: *> You were changing the mathematical definition of computations given > independently by Church, Post, Turing, Markov ,* I don't know what definition you're referring to but if it doesn't have something about actually

Re: Entanglement

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 8:12:11 PM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > > On 5/21/2018 11:21 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 5:28:38 PM UTC, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 5/20/2018 6:25 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 12:22:24 AM UTC,

Re: This is my mood now.

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 8:05:03 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Sunday, May 20, 2018 at 10:51:28 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSbPqin3L6E >> >> What does he say at 3:32 -3:35; something about Bear Creek? >> > > The end was truncated.

Re: Entanglement

On 5/21/2018 11:21 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 5:28:38 PM UTC, Brent wrote: On 5/20/2018 6:25 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 12:22:24 AM UTC, Brent wrote: On 5/20/2018 4:56 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: This is my mood now.

On Sunday, May 20, 2018 at 10:51:28 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSbPqin3L6E > > What does he say at 3:32 -3:35; something about Bear Creek? > The end was truncated. Try this. Gotta luv it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snTaSJk0n_Y=99s -- You

Re: Entanglement

On 5/21/2018 1:16 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: It's not a matter of being incorrect, just incomplete.  And there may be several attributes of a system such that different observers are ignorant of the values of different attributes and so they all write down different

Re: Entanglement

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 5:28:38 PM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > > On 5/20/2018 6:25 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 12:22:24 AM UTC, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 5/20/2018 4:56 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, May 20, 2018 at 10:35:26 PM UTC,

Re: Entanglement

On 5/20/2018 6:35 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: It's not a matter of being incorrect, just incomplete.  And there may be several attributes of a system such that different observers are ignorant of the values of different attributes and so they all write down different

Re: Entanglement

On 5/20/2018 6:25 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 12:22:24 AM UTC, Brent wrote: On 5/20/2018 4:56 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday, May 20, 2018 at 10:35:26 PM UTC, Brent wrote: On 5/20/2018 2:54 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Is the Continuum Hypothesis a) really true or really false, or b) something else ?

> On 18 May 2018, at 21:02, John Clark wrote: > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > ​>​ a Turing Machine knows nothing excepts what state it should go into, if > it should write a 1 or a 0, and if

Re: Entanglement

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 1:35:33 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 12:26:38 AM UTC, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 5/20/2018 5:00 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, May 20, 2018 at 10:53:38 PM UTC, Brent wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/20/2018