Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

Ok thanks! -Original Message- From: Alan Grayson To: Everything List Sent: Wed, Oct 30, 2019 8:53 pm Subject: Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 6:42:09 PM UTC-6, spudb...@aol.com wrote: Lets cut to the chase. Do you, or do you feel Schneider

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 6:42:09 PM UTC-6, spudb...@aol.com wrote: > > > Lets cut to the chase. Do you, or do you feel Schneider (without knowing) > believes that a subject's mind, is transferable, duplicatable, transferable > to a diff substrate? Hey, its Halloween! > I have no

Re: Superposition Misinterpreted

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:11:43 PM UTC-6, scerir wrote: > > I would revise my interpretation this way; the electron, or whatever, > behaves as a wave when no information exists to distinguish which-way, and > that wave goes through both slits producing interference. When such >

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

Lets cut to the chase. Do you, or do you feel Schneider (without knowing) believes that a subject's mind, is transferable, duplicatable, transferable to a diff substrate?  Hey, its Halloween!  -Original Message- From: Alan Grayson To: Everything List Sent: Wed, Oct 30, 2019 6:01 am

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 5:45:29 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote: > > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 07:44, Alan Grayson > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:30:19 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 5:01:14 AM UTC-5, Alan Grayson

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 07:44, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:30:19 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 5:01:14 AM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Schneider >>> >> >> >> >> >> It's a

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 3:44:23 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:30:19 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 5:01:14 AM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Schneider >>>

Re: Superposition Misinterpreted

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:36:58 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > On 10/30/2019 12:43 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: > > What descriptive term do you prefer? Those IR photons travel at the SoL. >> The point is that if there's information available for which-way, even if >> not observed, the

Re: Superposition Misinterpreted

I would revise my interpretation this way; the electron, or whatever, behaves as a wave when no information exists to distinguish which-way, and that wave goes through both slits producing interference. When such information exists, even if it isn't used or measured, the interference ceases to

Re: Galileo!

On 10/30/2019 3:42 AM, John Clark wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:40 AM Bruno Marchal > wrote: >> There is one why question religion can not answer and claims it would be wicked to even ask: Why is a religious answer better than no answer at

Re: Is idealism fundamentally unthinkable ?

On 10/30/2019 2:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 29 Oct 2019, at 19:01, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List wrote: On 10/29/2019 4:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Obviously. But my point is that if 2 does not make sense, 2 electrons does not make sense either, and the Big Bang is no more

Re: Galileo!

On 10/30/2019 2:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 29 Oct 2019, at 21:24, John Clark > wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:50 PM 'Brent Meeker' > wrote: > /Religion starts by telling us "why". / There is one why

Re: Superposition Misinterpreted

On 10/30/2019 12:43 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: What descriptive term do you prefer? Those IR photons travel at the SoL. The point is that if there's information available for which-way, even if not observed, the interference is destroyed. AG What does "available" mean?  The

Re: Superposition Misinterpreted

On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 5:53:10 PM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 5:18:45 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: >> >> >> On 10/29/2019 3:48 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 1:55:17 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/29/2019

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:30:19 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 5:01:14 AM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Schneider >> > > > > > It's a common AI view, that the program (programming) of consciousness >

Re: SpongeBob SpaceTime

On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 5:19:24 AM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > *A Fractal Menger Sponge Space-Time Proposal to Reconcile Measurements and > Theoretical Predictions of Cosmic Dark Energy* > >

Re: Galileo!

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:40 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: >> There is one why question religion can not answer and claims it would be >> wicked to even ask: Why is a religious answer better than no answer at all? > > > *> If a religion answers, with an air of claiming it is a definitive > answer;

Re: Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 5:01:14 AM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Schneider > It's a common AI view, that the program (programming) of consciousness (like what's running in your brain right now) is substrate independent. @philipthrift -- You

Interesting lady; Susan Schneider

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Schneider -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this

Re: Einstein's field equations

> On 29 Oct 2019, at 16:43, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 2:31:14 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > On Monday, October 28, 2019 at 7:21:40 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > On Monday, October 28, 2019 at 8:24:39 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: > On Sun, Oct

Re: Is idealism fundamentally unthinkable ?

> On 29 Oct 2019, at 19:01, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > wrote: > > > > On 10/29/2019 4:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> Obviously. But my point is that if 2 does not make sense, 2 electrons does >> not make sense either, and the Big Bang is no more something that we can >> today

Re: Galileo!

> On 29 Oct 2019, at 21:24, John Clark wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:50 PM 'Brent Meeker' > mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>> > wrote: > > > Religion starts by telling us "why". > > There is one why question religion can not answer and claims it would be > wicked to even

Re: Galileo!

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:27:48 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 29 Oct 2019, at 18:50, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > > The sciences do not try to explain, they hardly even try to interpret, > they mainly make models. By a model is meant a mathematical construct >

Re: Galileo!

> On 29 Oct 2019, at 18:50, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > wrote: > > > > On 10/29/2019 3:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 28 Oct 2019, at 19:36, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List >>> >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/28/2019 4:34 AM,

Re: Superposition Misinterpreted

> On 29 Oct 2019, at 11:58, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:50 PM Bruno Marchal > wrote: > On 28 Oct 2019, at 21:17, Alan Grayson > wrote: >> Keep in mind that the wave I have been referring to, is a probability wave,

Re: Superposition Misinterpreted

On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 6:18:45 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > On 10/29/2019 3:48 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 1:55:17 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/29/2019 12:46 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 1:25:43 PM