Re: Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread Brent Meeker
On 12/19/2021 6:12 PM, John Clark wrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 9:05 PM Bruce Kellett wrote: /> The Born Rule cannot be derived from the Schrodinger equation; it has to be added as a further independent assumption. So it is not true that Many Worlds makes only one

Re: Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread Brent Meeker
On 12/19/2021 5:22 PM, John Clark wrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 7:59 PM Brent Meeker wrote: On 12/19/2021 5:25 AM, John Clark wrote: By contrast the Many Worlds Theory only makes one assumption, Schrodinger's Equation means what it says. So Many Worlds wins. /> It also

Re: Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread Bruce Kellett
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:13 PM John Clark wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 9:05 PM Bruce Kellett > wrote: > > *> The Born Rule cannot be derived from the Schrodinger equation; it has >> to be added as a further independent assumption. So it is not true that >> Many Worlds makes only one

Re: Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread John Clark
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 9:05 PM Bruce Kellett wrote: *> The Born Rule cannot be derived from the Schrodinger equation; it has to > be added as a further independent assumption. So it is not true that Many > Worlds makes only one assumption.* > No quantum interpretation needs to derive the

Re: Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread Bruce Kellett
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:23 PM John Clark wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 7:59 PM Brent Meeker > wrote: > > On 12/19/2021 5:25 AM, John Clark wrote: >> >> By contrast the Many Worlds Theory only makes one assumption, >> Schrodinger's Equation means what it says. So Many Worlds wins. >> >> *>

Re: Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread John Clark
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 7:59 PM Brent Meeker wrote: On 12/19/2021 5:25 AM, John Clark wrote: > > By contrast the Many Worlds Theory only makes one assumption, > Schrodinger's Equation means what it says. So Many Worlds wins. > > *> It also makes the assumption that the eigenvalues of a

Re: Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread Brent Meeker
On 12/19/2021 5:25 AM, John Clark wrote: By contrast the Many Worlds Theory only makes one assumption, Schrodinger's Equation means what it says. So Many Worlds wins. It also makes the assumption that the eigenvalues of a measurement are realized probabilistically. Brent -- You received

Re: Dark Matter Update

2021-12-19 Thread Brent Meeker
Sounds right to me. Brent On 12/16/2021 3:37 PM, Tomas Pales wrote: If dark matter interacts only weakly with itself and with ordinary matter does it mean that it is less susceptible to quantum decoherence? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Hossenfelder on superdeterminism

2021-12-19 Thread Bruce Kellett
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 10:25 PM 'scerir' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > In (7) (Brans, 1988) the density for hidden variables depends not only on > the state of the particle pair but also on the detector settings a and b. > (I'm not a fan of superdeterminism.

Re: Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread Lawrence Crowell
This invokes some ideas of p-adic numbers. If Sabine is right and superdeterminism is a global law it would require a single consistent algorithm for solving p-adic problems, which are equivalent to Diophantine equations. Matiyasevich proved a variant of the Godel theorem which disproved

FW: Merry Christmas 2021

2021-12-19 Thread Philip Benjamin
December 5, 2021 1:57 PM Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com general_the...@googlegroups.com Subject: Merry Christmas 2021 Poem Christmas 2021 Philip Benjamin YHWH, yeah YHWH! Yield ye

Re: Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread Jesse Mazer
Yes, it's misleading for her to suggest the objections to superdeterminism are mainly about "killing free will", rather they're about the way the theory would need a strange "conspiracy" in the initial conditions of the universe to work. The idea is that if two entangled particles are sent out

Superdeterminism And Sabine Hossenfelder

2021-12-19 Thread John Clark
Sabine Hossenfelder recently posted this video on Youtube, this is my comment: Does Superdeterminism save Quantum Mechanics? Or does it kill free will and destroy science? I strongly agree with Sabine Hossenfelder that "free will" is incoherent

Re: Hossenfelder on superdeterminism

2021-12-19 Thread 'scerir' via Everything List
In (7) (Brans, 1988) the density for hidden variables depends not only on the state of the particle pair but also on the detector settings a and b. (I'm not a fan of superdeterminism. Somedody pointed out that concepts like falsifiability, isolated system, repetition of an experiment, random

Re: Hossenfelder on superdeterminism

2021-12-19 Thread Bruce Kellett
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 7:59 PM 'scerir' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > 'Vague statements that the result obtained depends on the > measurement made are either trivial or else meaningless without a > developed quantum formalism that incorporates the requires

Re: Hossenfelder on superdeterminism

2021-12-19 Thread 'scerir' via Everything List
'Vague statements that the result obtained depends on the measurement made are either trivial or else meaningless without a developed quantum formalism that incorporates the requires hidden variables.' -Bruce Indeed. But somebody wrote something, in 1988.