Thank you John for your thoughts. I few notes below:
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 7:17 AM John Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:47 PM Jason Resch wrote:
>
> *> At a high level, states of consciousness are states of knowledge,*
>>
>
> That is certainly true, but what about the reverse, does
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:47 PM Jason Resch wrote:
*> At a high level, states of consciousness are states of knowledge,*
>
That is certainly true, but what about the reverse, does a high state of
knowledge imply consciousness? I'll never be able to prove it but I
believe it does but of course
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:47 PM Jason Resch wrote:
*> At a high level, states of consciousness are states of knowledge,*
>
That is certainly true, but what about the reverse, does a high state of
knowledge imply consciousness? I'll never be able to prove it but I
believe it does but of course
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 at 03:47, Jason Resch wrote:
> I would like to propose a theory of consciousness which I think might have
> some merit, but more importantly I would like to see what criticism others
> might have for it.
>
> I have chosen the name "conditionalism" for this theory, as it is
I would like to propose a theory of consciousness which I think might have
some merit, but more importantly I would like to see what criticism others
might have for it.
I have chosen the name "conditionalism" for this theory, as it is based
loosely on the notion of conditional statements as they
5 matches
Mail list logo
