On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:22:16 PM UTC+1, Brent wrote:
On 4/16/2014 2:10 PM, LizR wrote:
On 17 April 2014 07:58, Stephen Paul King
step...@provensecure.comjavascript:
wrote:
Polygamy is common for most mammals
Because most mammals don't extend their range from
On 18 April 2014 09:14, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:22:16 PM UTC+1, Brent wrote:
On 4/16/2014 2:10 PM, LizR wrote:
On 17 April 2014 07:58, Stephen Paul King step...@provensecure.comwrote:
Polygamy is common for most mammals
Because most mammals
-the-woman-who-has-five-husbands-and-they-are-all-brothers/
Bruno
-Original Message-
From: meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Apr 15, 2014 12:38 pm
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 4/15/2014 1:59 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Poligamy
If all men were brothers, would you want your sister to marry one?
(Or something like that...)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On 15 Apr 2014, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/15/2014 8:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Read what I wrote. Machine intelligence is not a question of
brickology. Intelligence is not something which can be engineered.
It is a question of exploration of some reality, and it is a
question of us
-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Apr 16, 2014 3:57 am
Subject: Re: Climate models
If all men were brothers, would you want your sister to marry one?
(Or something like that...)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe
, though, somewhere in Hugh
Everett-ville.
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Apr 16, 2014 3:43 am
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 16 Apr 2014, at 01:14, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Pair bonding
On 17 April 2014 02:36, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Some of it is motivated from females needing to survive and look after
their children. How much wealth, be it hunted game, or IPO stock options.
Unless the male is very wealthy, there is no advantage for the female to
share a mail, Some do,
On 17 April 2014 02:48, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
The little boy at the math blackboard got the arithmetic wrong. The
little boy turned to his teacher and said: 'Yes, it's the wrong answer, but
what does it matter, if all men are brothers? -Jack Handey
--
You received this message
Polygamy is common for most mammals
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:51 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 April 2014 02:36, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Some of it is motivated from females needing to survive and look after
their children. How much wealth, be it hunted game, or IPO stock
On 4/16/2014 1:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Yes, like in nature. The more a species is clever, the less the infant brain is
hardwired, and the longer his learning period (infancy) appears to be. I see
intelligence as an ability to learn and to change our mind. Adult is the phase when we
apply
: Wed, Apr 16, 2014 3:51 pm
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 17 April 2014 02:36, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Some of it is motivated from females needing to survive and look after their
children. How much wealth, be it hunted game, or IPO stock options. Unless the
male is very wealthy
God is dead-Nietzsche
Nietzsche is dead-God
yeah, I know, but I had to post it.
-Original Message-
From: meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Apr 16, 2014 4:00 pm
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 4/16/2014 1:16
On 17 April 2014 07:58, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Polygamy is common for most mammals
Because most mammals don't extend their range from Africa to the Arctic. As
I said, there's a tendency towards polygamy in hot countries, but it
wouldn't work for humans in cold
On 17 April 2014 08:24, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
I don't know genetics as well as I should, but I think, whether its
psychological, or genetic psychological, or something else? If women are
provided birth control, and a good deal of wealth, independent of a
supplying male, then a women is
On 4/16/2014 2:10 PM, LizR wrote:
On 17 April 2014 07:58, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.com
mailto:stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Polygamy is common for most mammals
Because most mammals don't extend their range from Africa to the Arctic. As I said,
there's a tendency
On 17 April 2014 09:22, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/16/2014 2:10 PM, LizR wrote:
On 17 April 2014 07:58, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Polygamy is common for most mammals
Because most mammals don't extend their range from Africa to the Arctic.
is required to
rear offspring successfully.
-Original Message-
From: LizR lizj...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Apr 16, 2014 5:10 pm
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 17 April 2014 07:58, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.com wrote
Bruno, Litz and everyone:
I want to say sorry form muy arrogance and disrespect. The arguments
remain.
El 15/04/2014 00:37, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com escribió:
2014-04-15 0:25 GMT+02:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
On 15 April 2014 03:59, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On
Thank you. Could you now please state the arguments plainly, so I can see
what they actually are, shorn of the arrogance and disrespect.
Also I would appreciate a considered response to my arguments.
---Liz's arguments, restated for your convenience---
On top of avoiding suffering for me and
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-04-14 13:51 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
Hi Alberto,
What in my reasoning steps is wrong?
I find a number of problems with your reasoning:
1) You assume to know what the reproductive
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:51:22PM +0200, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Alberto,
So who knows what our biological program looks like or how complex it is?
There are compelling reasons to think that it is very
On 15 Apr 2014, at 00:30, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2014-04-14 17:59 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Apr 2014, at 09:40, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
No doubt on this for me. Affordable, and with good user's
On 4/15/2014 1:59 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Poligamy is common when big disparity of wealt, in low density coutries in
harsh
conditions or in societies where violence is increasing Do you thing that
these
conditions are in the aspirations of the civilized society?. The fact that
On 4/15/2014 8:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Read what I wrote. Machine intelligence is not a question of brickology. Intelligence is
not something which can be engineered.
It is a question of exploration of some reality, and it is a question of us being
sufficiently inetlligent to recognize
This paper is the best I have seen as a method to construct a real AI:
http://www.alexwg.org/publications/PhysRevLett_110-168702.pdf
It is already built, it is just a matter of scaling it up But don't
assume that such AI will perceive the same physical world as we do!
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014
, Apr 15, 2014 12:38 pm
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 4/15/2014 1:59 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Poligamy is common when big disparity of wealt, inlow density
coutries in harsh conditions
On 13 Apr 2014, at 20:55, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/13/2014 10:39 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Apr 2014, at 01:32, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/12/2014 11:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Apr 2014, at 01:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/11/2014 8:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
(2) create new race of
2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
No doubt on this for me. Affordable, and with good user's manuals. Most
pregnant kids get pregnant before having has the sexual education school
classes according to a recent statistics.
For people like most of you, most of you
On 14 April 2014 19:40, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
No doubt on this for me. Affordable, and with good user's manuals. Most
pregnant kids get pregnant before having has the sexual education school
classes
What in my reasoning steps is wrong?
That is the typical rationalist reaction. The pride of reason that supposes
that a little quantity of neurons (created by evolution) plus the little
experience and desires can fix the pervasive intelligence of nature. You
are ideologically sick.
What you call
On 14 April 2014 20:42, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
What in my reasoning steps is wrong?
The bit where you said we need to listen to the inner voice.
That is the typical rationalist reaction. The pride of reason that
supposes that a little quantity of neurons (created by
It is clear in the reasoning.
What reasoning step between contraception and the problems that is produced
is wrong?
it does not matter if you like it or not, if you go against your inner
program ( I tell you in machine terms, that is the level that people here
understand) The consequences are
So do you have anything except for ad hominems? (or feminems in this case,
I suppose)
By the way. Do you know what ad-hominem mean?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
2014-04-14 12:47 GMT+02:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
On 14 April 2014 20:42, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
What in my reasoning steps is wrong?
The bit where you said we need to listen to the inner voice.
The price for you to not believe the inner voice that is, going
On 14 April 2014 22:56, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
So do you have anything except for ad hominems? (or feminems in this
case, I suppose)
By the way. Do you know what ad-hominem mean?
Attacking the person rather than their arguments. Which is what you were
doing.
The
On 14 April 2014 23:01, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-14 12:47 GMT+02:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
On 14 April 2014 20:42, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
What in my reasoning steps is wrong?
The bit where you said we need to listen to the inner voice.
Ok. forget me
2014-04-14 13:09 GMT+02:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
On 14 April 2014 23:01, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-14 12:47 GMT+02:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
On 14 April 2014 20:42, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
What in my reasoning steps is
Hi Alberto,
What in my reasoning steps is wrong?
I find a number of problems with your reasoning:
1) You assume to know what the reproductive strategy of our species is.
Darwinian evolution is a theory on how biological complexity arrises. It
does not predict neither a single nor necessarily
On 14 Apr 2014, at 09:40, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
No doubt on this for me. Affordable, and with good user's manuals.
Most pregnant kids get pregnant before having has the sexual
education school classes according to a recent
On 4/14/2014 3:54 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
It is clear in the reasoning.
What reasoning step between contraception and the problems that is produced is
wrong?
it does not matter if you like it or not, if you go against your inner program ( I tell
you in machine terms, that is the level
On 4/14/2014 4:51 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
3) You assume that going against your simple reproductive program will cause
suffering
This is a weird assumption. Consider this: you cannot decide to stop breathing. Your
brain literally won't let you. So evolution did not select breathing to be an
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:12 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/14/2014 4:51 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
3) You assume that going against your simple reproductive program will
cause suffering
This is a weird assumption. Consider this: you cannot decide to stop
breathing. Your brain
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:12 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/14/2014 4:51 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
3) You assume that going against your simple reproductive program will
cause suffering
This is a
On 4/14/2014 11:35 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
mailto:te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:12 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On
On 4/14/2014 12:40 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be:
No doubt on this for me. Affordable, and with good user's manuals. Most
pregnant
kids get pregnant before having has the sexual education school
2014-04-14 13:51 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
Hi Alberto,
What in my reasoning steps is wrong?
I find a number of problems with your reasoning:
1) You assume to know what the reproductive strategy of our species is.
Darwinian evolution is a theory on how biological
On 15 April 2014 03:59, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 14 Apr 2014, at 09:40, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
No doubt on this for me. Affordable, and with good user's manuals. Most
pregnant kids get pregnant before having
2014-04-14 17:59 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Apr 2014, at 09:40, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
No doubt on this for me. Affordable, and with good user's manuals. Most
pregnant kids get pregnant before having
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:51:22PM +0200, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Alberto,
So who knows what our biological program looks like or how complex it is?
There are compelling reasons to think that it is very complex indeed. For
example: a counter-intuitive empirical observation is that the
2014-04-15 0:25 GMT+02:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
On 15 April 2014 03:59, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 14 Apr 2014, at 09:40, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
No doubt on this for me. Affordable, and with good user's
On 15 April 2014 06:43, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/14/2014 11:35 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:12 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/14/2014 4:51 AM,
On 14 April 2014 22:54, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
It is clear in the reasoning.
What reasoning step between contraception and the problems that is
produced is wrong?
it does not matter if you like it or not, if you go against your inner
program ( I tell you in machine
On 4/14/2014 3:30 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
What I said is not related with you neither with COMP neither with yes doctor or not
doctor. I talk at the level of an architect. You talk as a brick-ologists. I don´t care
about your substitution level. I tell you that if you don't get smart and
On 15 April 2014 12:51, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/14/2014 3:30 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
What I said is not related with you neither with COMP neither with yes
doctor or not doctor. I talk at the level of an architect. You talk as a
brick-ologists. I don´t care about your
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 5:51 PM
On 4/14/2014 3:30 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
What I said is not related with you neither with COMP neither with yes doctor
or not doctor. I
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 11:48 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 4/14/2014 12:40 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 6:21 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 15 April 2014 12:51, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/14/2014 3:30 PM
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 1:32 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/12/2014 11:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Apr 2014, at 01:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/11/2014 8:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
(2) create new race of beings, smarter and better than us, to explore
the universe.
On 13 Apr 2014, at 01:32, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/12/2014 11:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Apr 2014, at 01:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/11/2014 8:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
(2) create new race of beings, smarter and better than us, to
explore the universe.
This is what we do since the
On 4/13/2014 10:39 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Apr 2014, at 01:32, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/12/2014 11:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Apr 2014, at 01:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/11/2014 8:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
(2) create new race of beings, smarter and better than us, to explore the
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 11:51:34 AM UTC+1, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Stephen Paul King
step...@provensecure.com javascript: wrote:
Read Corona's post carefully.
I did, and I find his general ideas interesting and worth considering. I
don't quire
On 11 Apr 2014, at 19:14, Chris de Morsella wrote:
I liken abortion with abuse of hard drugs. It is not nice, but if
prohibited, it still happens, but much more
often, and always in worst conditions.
Better to limit them by education and information, and reduce the
harm by health
On 12 Apr 2014, at 01:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/11/2014 8:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
(2) create new race of beings, smarter and better than us, to
explore the universe.
This is what we do since the beginnings. We are them. The
distinction between artificial and natural is artificial.
I
What's amusing is that he starts off as though he is going to tell us some great general
truth - but then immediately falls into a polemic against abortion. And it is doubly
amusing because every criticism he makes applies to his favorite organization, the Roman
Catholic Church.
Brent
On
On 4/12/2014 11:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Apr 2014, at 01:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/11/2014 8:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
(2) create new race of beings, smarter and better than us, to explore the
universe.
This is what we do since the beginnings. We are them. The distinction
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 8:34 pm
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 11 April 2014 06:45, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Feminism I am ok with because equal pay for equal work. As an element of
Marxism it sucks, but otherwise its good.
Actually Marxism
on
the Moon so you can crow about how you've won the space race was just a big
publicity stunt.
-Original Message-
From: LizR lizj...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 8:24 pm
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 11 April 2014 06:45
On 10 Apr 2014, at 19:09, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/10/2014 8:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 12:51, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.com
wrote:
Read Corona's post carefully.
I did, and I find his general ideas
everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 11:53 am
Subject: Re: Climate models
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote:
By the way, because it seems that you are interested, rejection of
gays by men will never ever change
On 11 Apr 2014, at 03:08, Chris de Morsella wrote:
From: LizR lizj...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 11 April 2014 11:41, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:59 PM
-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, Apr 11, 2014 12:32 pm
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 10 Apr 2014, at 20:45, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
The Russians have continued space travel and so have the Chinese. The
Progressive BHO administration is disinterested, by in large, with space stuff
On 4/11/2014 8:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
(2) create new race of beings, smarter and better than us, to explore the
universe.
This is what we do since the beginnings. We are them. The distinction between artificial
and natural is artificial.
I deliberately avoided writing 'artificial
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: Climate models
On 11 Apr 2014, at 03:08, Chris de Morsella wrote:
From: LizR lizj
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Telmo Menezes
Maybe I'm a bit soft because my cat, that lived 12 years with me, died
recently. As long
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Read Corona's post carefully.
I did, and I find his general ideas interesting and worth considering. I
don't quire agree that space exploration cannot compete with religion. When
I was growing up, I was
sex orientation can not be changed, neither a matrimony can be other than a
man and a woman, neither climate can be changed by little ants like us,
neither internationalism can be a genuine feeling, neither supranational
identities can be fabricated, neither woman can live without depending on
By the way, because it seems that you are interested, rejection of gays by
men will never ever change. There are compelling evolitionary reasons. If
any, the current promotion of gay rights will exacerbate true homophoby
in the medium- long term. In the same way that feminism is increasing the
Dear Telmo,
Those truths that are often the hardest to learn require the most
painful of lessons.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
sex orientation can not be changed, neither a matrimony can be other than
a man and a woman, neither climate can
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
By the way, because it seems that you are interested, rejection of gays by
men will never ever change. There are compelling evolitionary reasons. If
any, the current promotion of gay rights will exacerbate true
On 10 Apr 2014, at 12:51, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.com
wrote:
Read Corona's post carefully.
I did, and I find his general ideas interesting and worth
considering. I don't quire agree that space exploration cannot
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Alberto G. Corona
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 8:10 AM
To: everything-list
Subject: Re: Climate models
By the way, because it seems that you are interested, rejection of gays by
men
The Swiss where many, very many as I understand it, young men are bisexual,
seems to argue to the contrary... Seems they found out that sex is sex and
for a man to love it must be based on sex.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
By the way, because it
Chris and Guitar, you are funny. Do you believe that these mere insults
andd ad-hominem straw man etc, have any effect across internet except to
laugh at you?
The time of the police state enforcer of ideológicall uniformity has gone
since 1995. Oh wait I know why you may need another one...
Alberto,
Don't feed the trolls...
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
Chris and Guitar, you are funny. Do you believe that these mere insults
andd ad-hominem straw man etc, have any effect across internet except to
laugh at you?
The time of
2014-04-10 18:28 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com:
Chris and Guitar, you are funny. Do you believe that these mere insults
andd ad-hominem straw man etc, have any effect across internet except to
laugh at you?
Who's the one insulting ? You are certainly blind to your own
Stephen
hehehe. Ok I will not.
Reality can fight alone and will win inevitably against the ones that deny
it.
The problem is the price to pay in the process
2014-04-10 18:38 GMT+02:00 Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.com:
Alberto,
Don't feed the trolls...
On Thu, Apr 10,
Dear Alberto,
Cost is always an issue. It cannot be avoided (contra the belief of
magical thinkers) but it can be minimized by increasing the efficiency of
systems.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
Stephen
hehehe. Ok I will not.
Reality can
On 4/10/2014 7:59 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
sex orientation can not be changed, neither a matrimony can be other than a man and a
woman, neither climate can be changed by little ants like us, neither internationalism
can be a genuine feeling, neither supranational identities can be
On 4/10/2014 8:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 12:51, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.com
mailto:stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Read Corona's post carefully.
I did, and I find his general ideas
, 2014 11:53 am
Subject: Re: Climate models
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, because it seems that you are interested, rejection of gays by men
will never ever change. There are compelling evolitionary reasons. If any, the
current
On 11 April 2014 02:59, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
sex orientation can not be changed, neither a matrimony can be other than
a man and a woman, neither climate can be changed by little ants like us,
neither internationalism can be a genuine feeling, neither supranational
If you are a woman that aborted, you know how much you suffered and
probably are suffering. I´m very sorry
2014-04-10 22:05 GMT+02:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
On 11 April 2014 02:59, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
sex orientation can not be changed, neither a matrimony can be
On 11 April 2014 08:33, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are a woman that aborted, you know how much you suffered and
probably are suffering. I´m very sorry
Yes, I suffered a bit, at the time, mostly emotionally - but now I'm just
utterly thankful I made the right decision.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:33:54PM +0200, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
If you are a woman that aborted, you know how much you suffered and
probably are suffering. I´m very sorry
This is an overt generalisation. A number of women have confided with
me about their abortions - some have described
On 4/10/2014 3:41 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:33:54PM +0200, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
If you are a woman that aborted, you know how much you suffered and
probably are suffering. I´m very sorry
This is an overt generalisation. A number of women have confided with
me
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 12:51, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Read Corona's post carefully.
I did, and I find his general ideas interesting
On 11 April 2014 11:04, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 12:51, Telmo Menezes wrote:
But back to the gay issue. If the assumption is that gay promotion is
part of a strategy to reduce the
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
sex orientation can not be changed, neither a matrimony can be other than
a man and a woman,
If you insist on that definition of the word, I don't really care. I am
married, but if it became generally accepted that
On 11 April 2014 11:41, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
sex orientation can not be changed, neither a matrimony can be other than
a man and a woman,
If you insist on that definition of the word, I
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
