2009/5/7 daddycay...@msn.com:
People here keep thinking that I am trying to convince people that
God is a person and/or that there is a God. Let me give you a hint
that that's not the kind of thing that I would think is worthwhile to
try to convince people about my wife. (convince Wow, we
On 07/05/2009, at 3:43 PM, daddycay...@msn.com wrote:
I think that knowing what a person is is sort of like knowing what
consciousness is.
Good. Have you ever had the feeling/hunch/thought/intuition/
apprehension/revelation/vision (call it what you will) that you know a
person to whom the
On May 7, 1:42 am, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
So - going back to God then, let's maybe do an OPV on him/her/it
Hint:
If I can't do an OPV on God, then I'm not convinced that:
1. God is a person (100% convinced)
2. There is a God (74% convinced)
People here keep thinking
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:30 AM, daddycay...@msn.com wrote:
On May 7, 1:42 am, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
So - going back to God then, let's maybe do an OPV on him/her/it
Hint:
If I can't do an OPV on God, then I'm not convinced that:
1. God is a person (100% convinced)
On 08/05/2009, at 2:30 AM, daddycay...@msn.com wrote:
People here keep thinking that I am trying to convince people that
God is a person and/or that there is a God.
OK - we will stop it! I don't really think that, but if you are
anything like me Tom, you have gone through periods in your
Fabulous post, Jason. Enthralling stuff.
Kim
On 08/05/2009, at 9:20 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
If we on this list believe that everything (or at least everything
with a self consistent definition) exists, then we must also believe
that all possible gods exist. Be they artificial
On May 4, 6:13 am, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/4 daddycay...@msn.com:
I agree that religion, and a lot of other stuff, produces a lot of
fake certainty. Not good. So that implies that atheism is the way to
go?
But doesn't it make sense that if God were
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:33:52 -0700
Subject: Re: Temporary Reality
From: daddycay...@msn.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
On May 4, 6:13 am, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/4 daddycay...@msn.com:
I agree that religion, and a lot of other stuff
as a
staging post to a future, more correct theology. As such, atheism
could be serving a strictly beneficial purpose at this time. Why I
refer to it as temporary reality. It may actually be necessary to be
wrong about something to provoke the mind to jump off the rails of its
habitual patterns
2009/5/7 daddycay...@msn.com:
On May 4, 6:13 am, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/4 daddycay...@msn.com:
I agree that religion, and a lot of other stuff, produces a lot of
fake certainty. Not good. So that implies that atheism is the way to
go?
But doesn't
- the only advantage I am suggesting is that atheism be seen as a
staging post to a future, more correct theology. As such, atheism
could be serving a strictly beneficial purpose at this time. Why I
refer to it as temporary reality. It may actually be necessary to be
wrong about something
On May 6, 12:47 pm, Jesse Mazer laserma...@hotmail.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:33:52 -0700
Subject: Re: Temporary Reality
From: daddycay...@msn.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
On May 4, 6:13 am, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/4 daddycay
On 04/05/2009, at 12:57 PM, daddycay...@msn.com wrote:
But doesn't it make sense that if God were personal, and a human
person like us could relate to him/her as a person, then that would
result in expanding our consciousness?
Tom
What particular (and verifiable) personal interactions
On May 5, 1:27 am, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 04/05/2009, at 12:57 PM, daddycay...@msn.com wrote:
But doesn't it make sense that if God were personal, and a human
person like us could relate to him/her as a person, then that would
result in expanding our consciousness?
On 05 May 2009, at 18:19, daddycay...@msn.com wrote:
The second question is in the form of, Doesn't C imply D?:
But doesn't it make sense that if God were personal, and a human
person like us could relate to him/her as a person, then that would
result in expanding our consciousness?
2009/5/4 daddycay...@msn.com:
I agree that religion, and a lot of other stuff, produces a lot of
fake certainty. Not good. So that implies that atheism is the way to
go?
But doesn't it make sense that if God were personal, and a human
person like us could relate to him/her as a person,
I agree that religion, and a lot of other stuff, produces a lot of
fake certainty. Not good. So that implies that atheism is the way to
go?
But doesn't it make sense that if God were personal, and a human
person like us could relate to him/her as a person, then that would
result in expanding
On 01 May 2009, at 08:53, Kim Jones wrote:
Perhaps atheism is necessary as a stepping stone to a more correct
theology?
Ah ah, I see that you want to provoke me :)
Hard to say, I am discovering that many atheist websites adopt a new
definition of atheism, making it a form of
Perhaps atheism is necessary as a stepping stone to a more correct
theology? Materialistic atheism is not irrational, being on the side
of reason, but it may be illogical, given the advanced view of reality
we are adopting on this list that challenges the myth of a hard
material
19 matches
Mail list logo
