On 15 Jul 2009, at 04:15, m.a. wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:40 AM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
Hi Kim, Marty, Johnathan, John, Mirek, and all...
Bruno: May I advise you about an
On 15 Jul 2009, at 09:09, Kim Jones wrote:
On 14/07/2009, at 6:40 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The intersection of the two sets S1 = {1, 2, 3} and S2 = {2, 3, 7,
8} will be written (S1 \inter S2), and is equal to the set of
elements which belongs to both S1 and S2. We have
(S1 \inter S2) =
*Please read between your lines included in bold* letters
*John
*
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 15 Jul 2009, at 00:50, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno,
I appreciate your grade-school teaching. We (I for one) can use it.
I still find that whatever you
On 14 Jul 2009, at 10:40, Bruno Marchal wrote:
snip
So the subsets of {a, b} are { }, {a}, {b}, {a, b}.
But set have been invented to make a ONE from a MANY, and it is
natural to consider THE set of all subsets of a set. It is called
the powerset of that set.
So the powerset of {a,
Bruno,
I have no idea how to even begin to answer these questions. Have
you given us the definitions we need to do so?
On 16 Jul 2009, at 15:17, John Mikes wrote:
I would not restrict 'a set' to what WE can conceive, or define now.
(Not even within the 'math'-related domain).
Nor do I.
I never say so. On the contrary we will see how different are sets
when seen by machines and gods, but to explain this
On 16 Jul 2009, at 15:29, m.a. wrote:
Bruno,
I have no idea how to even begin to answer these
questions. Have you given us the definitions we need to do so?
On 16 Jul 2009, at 16:06, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jul 2009, at 15:29, m.a. wrote:
Bruno,
I have no idea how to even begin to answer these
questions. Have you given us the definitions we need to do so?
With Bruno and his mighty handful engaged in the undodgeable (though
constantly dodged) task of working towards an elementary grasp of the
technical underpinnings of COMP, and patently lacking the fortitude of
these valorous Stakhanovites, I have been spending my time lurking,
reading and musing.
David,
I appreciated this post because I'm more interested in the
philosophical implications (which I'm hoping to find at the end of Bruno's
UDA bridge to Valhalla) of these goings-on ...than in the mathematical
ones. Best,
10 matches
Mail list logo
