Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern with. Well, we
were discussing creation myths vs science, hence the concern.
It is grammatical in the same sense as Senators Express Concern onReverse
Mortgage Rule
*s* [*not rule*] By RACHEL
On 4 May 2014 17:15, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:14:59 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via Everything List
everyth...@googlegroups.com wrote:
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the centuries,
but you couldn't term the
2014-05-04 6:24 GMT+02:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
On 4 May 2014 15:20, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
I have forwarded your query to an expert in Arabic Grammar. Your quote
from Wikipedia is correct. What I can inform you, based on my
understanding, is that the pronoun 'ha' used
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:15 AM, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:14:59 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via Everything List
everyth...@googlegroups.com wrote:
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the centuries,
but you couldn't
Thanks, I will look it up.
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, May 3, 2014 4:05 pm
Subject: RE: TRONNIES
Take a peak.
I believe I address every major issue in physics, from the
Liz, I am guessing the capitalism remark is undeserved, in the sense that
making money is inherently evil (making goods, and providing services?), for me
that is too broad a brush you paint with for that observation. Now, if you want
a glaring example, we look to the millions killed by Belgium
Defending ourselves from the guys, today, is way different from 800 years ago.
They were significantly, more tolerant then Christendom was during the same
period and for centuries afterwards. More tolerant, does not mean they were
tolerant, but they tended to be less murderous, then! From the
The machine:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/1
Bad news from the doctor:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/11
Turing test:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/15
Cheers,
Telmo.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:09:10 PM UTC+1, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:15 AM, ghi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:14:59 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via Everything List
everyth...@googlegroups.com wrote:
I shan't
The modern/recent actions of the Umah. the faithful, the Islamic Community have
not been real good either. The drive for Sharia Law everywhere is on the march
and from what I believe I have seen is the counter-colonization of the faithful
of their former masters, be it Algerians to France, or
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 1:43:12 PM UTC+1, telmo_menezes wrote:
The machine:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/1
Bad news from the doctor:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/11
Turing test:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/15
Cheers,
Telmo.
So where do you stand on this Telmo? I
Hi ghibbsa,
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 3:24 PM, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:09:10 PM UTC+1, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:15 AM, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:14:59 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via
On 04 May 2014, at 01:14, LizR wrote:
On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
wrote:
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the
centuries, but you couldn't term the Hindu faith as pacifist either.
In the 20th century the
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:48 PM, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 1:43:12 PM UTC+1, telmo_menezes wrote:
The machine:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/1
Bad news from the doctor:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/11
Turing test:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/15
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 04 May 2014, at 01:14, LizR wrote:
On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the centuries,
but you couldn't
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 7:09:27 PM UTC+1, telmo_menezes wrote:
Hi ghibbsa,
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 3:24 PM, ghi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:09:10 PM UTC+1, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:15 AM, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, May 4,
On 5/4/2014 1:45 AM, LizR wrote:
Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern with. Well, we
were
discussing creation myths vs science, hence the concern.
It is grammatical in the same sense as Senators Express Concern on
Reverse
Mortgage Rule/s/ [/not rule/]
Telmo, some 2+ decades ago I think I had a reason to avert from the topic
called *panpsychism* (would be hard to recall it adequately now).
As I remember I called the phenomenon covered by this misnomer
PANSENSITIVITY (what I would not like to defend today anymore). Psych seems
to me too 'human'
Bruno, your 'scientific' logic supersedes me. Explaining ontology by
existing and - I suppose - existing by the likes of 'ontology' (etc.) is
more than what I buy.
We might still *stumble* on truth, (or you do not?), what we may believe
as truth and draw very important consequences upon OTHER
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 8:17:29 PM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 May 2014, at 01:14, LizR wrote:
On 4 May 2014 07:22, spudboy100 via Everything List
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: wrote:
I shan't defend the behaviors of the Abe religions over the centuries,
but you couldn't
Somebody wrote (Liz?):
*For example there is no problem with capitalism per se, unless you allow
money to vote. Lobbying can be permitted, but not through financial helps.
If you allow this, you kill capitalism, and transform it into corporatism
and monopolism, which kill the genuine competition
On 5 May 2014 00:00, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Liz, I am guessing the capitalism remark is undeserved, in the sense that
making money is inherently evil (making goods, and providing services?),
for me that is
It's only undeserved if everyone is
On 5 May 2014 07:38, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Yes, and this already happened. I would add that capitalism is not
catching up with anything because it doesn't even exist at the moment. The
money supply itself is not under the control of the market, so the system
is
On 5 May 2014 07:42, Philip Benjamin medinucl...@hotmail.com wrote:
[*lizj...@gmail.com* lizj...@gmail.com] Maybe you should attempt to
explain your position in a standalone post rather than making - to me
rather confusing - comments which allude to it.
[*Philip Benjamin*]
*Testability:*
On 5 May 2014 07:56, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/4/2014 1:45 AM, LizR wrote:
Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern
with. Well, we were discussing creation myths vs science, hence the
concern.
It is grammatical in the same sense as Senators Express
Yes, good point. It seems likely to me that people would notice that there
was a queen bee who laid all the eggs, and perhaps make some assumptions
based on that. If they noticed that the queen started as a normal worker
but was fed special stuff to make her into the queen... well, people
weren't
PS did I get that right about the queen being fed special stuff? My
knowledge is also badly informed on many things...)
On 5 May 2014 10:24, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, good point. It seems likely to me that people would notice that there
was a queen bee who laid all the eggs, and
On 5 May 2014 08:42, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
In my agnostic vocabulary the 'real' includes lots of 'inconnues' that
may change whatever we THINK is included - as historic examples show.
I still hold mathematics an exorbitant achievement of the H U M A N mind
What do you think
I'm back!
I lost my desire to post due to an existential crisis, but now I've
regained it thanks to the above comic.
On 5 May 2014 08:12, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Telmo, some 2+ decades ago I think I had a reason to avert from the topic
called *panpsychism* (would be
On 5 May 2014 09:34, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Somebody wrote (Liz?):
*For example there is no problem with capitalism per se, unless you allow
money to vote. Lobbying can be permitted, but not through financial helps.
If you allow this, you kill capitalism, and transform it into
On 5/4/2014 12:38 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Yes, and this already happened. I would add that capitalism is not catching up with
anything because it doesn't even exist at the moment. The money supply itself is not
under the control of the market, so the system is non-capitalist at its core.
The late Bob Monkhouse was way before my time and never trendy. But aft er
he died they looked at his jokes, which were just simple and so funny they
decided he was a genius. Here is one of his jokes that makes me laugh every
time: He's a stand up comedian and he says to the audience:
When I
I remember him. You're right he wasn't trendy. But going by that joke he
was quite funny.
On 5 May 2014 12:49, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
The late Bob Monkhouse was way before my time and never trendy. But aft er
he died they looked at his jokes, which were just simple and so funny they
I don't know much about bitcoin, except you can mine bitcoins at some
expense - to your power bill, your time and the environment. What's the
point? (And how does it manipulate the medium of exchange?)
On 5 May 2014 12:34, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/4/2014 12:38 PM, Telmo
On 5/4/2014 3:00 PM, LizR wrote:
On 5 May 2014 07:56, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/4/2014 1:45 AM, LizR wrote:
Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern with. Well,
we were
discussing creation myths vs science, hence
On 5/4/2014 3:25 PM, LizR wrote:
PS did I get that right about the queen being fed special stuff? My knowledge is also
badly informed on many things...)
It think she's fed the special stuff, royal jelly, as a larva; so it would be hard
ascertain she started as a normal worker just by
It creates a parallel medium of exchange in which those who make bitcoins first hope to
profit from their appreciation.
Brent
On 5/4/2014 6:12 PM, LizR wrote:
I don't know much about bitcoin, except you can mine bitcoins at some expense - to
your power bill, your time and the environment.
On 5 May 2014 13:21, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/4/2014 3:25 PM, LizR wrote:
PS did I get that right about the queen being fed special stuff? My
knowledge is also badly informed on many things...)
It think she's fed the special stuff, royal jelly, as a larva; so it
would be
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:24:15AM +1200, LizR wrote:
Yes, good point. It seems likely to me that people would notice that there
was a queen bee who laid all the eggs, and perhaps make some assumptions
based on that. If they noticed that the queen started as a normal worker
but was fed special
On 5 May 2014 13:18, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/4/2014 3:00 PM, LizR wrote:
On 5 May 2014 07:56, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/4/2014 1:45 AM, LizR wrote:
Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern
with. Well, we were discussing creation
On 5 May 2014 13:57, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
It creates a parallel medium of exchange in which those who make
bitcoins first hope to profit from their appreciation.
Hm. It all sounds a bit Ponzi-like to me.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On 5 May 2014 14:33, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:24:15AM +1200, LizR wrote:
Yes, good point. It seems likely to me that people would notice that
there
was a queen bee who laid all the eggs, and perhaps make some assumptions
based on that. If
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 6:12 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Evolution from Scripture
I don't know much about bitcoin, except you can mine bitcoins at some expense
On Monday, May 5, 2014 2:09:31 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
I remember him. You're right he wasn't trendy. But going by that joke he
was quite funny.
On 5 May 2014 12:49, ghi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
The late Bob Monkhouse was way before my time and never trendy. But aft
er he died
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:24 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, good point. It seems likely to me that people would notice that there
was a queen bee who laid all the eggs, and perhaps make some assumptions
based on that. If they noticed that the queen started as a normal worker
but was
On 5 May 2014 16:16, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:24 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, good point. It seems likely to me that people would notice that
there was a queen bee who laid all the eggs, and perhaps make some
assumptions based on that. If
On 5 May 2014 16:07, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
The other one I can remember was like When I die I want to go peacefully
in my sleep like my father, not screaming and terrified - like his
passengers
I always thought that was Emo Phillips!
We're collecting nukes, the Russians and the Chinese
On 04 May 2014, at 14:43, Telmo Menezes wrote:
The machine:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/1
Bad news from the doctor:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/11
Turing test:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/15
LOL. Not bad. Actually I made myself comic trips to explain UDA in the
48 matches
Mail list logo
