Dear Bruno,
Interleaving. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:40 AM
Subject: Re: MIND and MATTER
Dear Stephen,
I only have the vaguest hand waving reasoning at this time but
On 31-Aug-02, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Interleaving. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:40 AM
Subject: Re: MIND and MATTER
Dear Stephen,
I only have the
Dear George,
would it be too strenuous to briefly (and understandably???)
summarize a position on time which is in the 'spirit' of the
'spirited' members of this list?
(I mean not the - as you wrote - just a rehash of old
science-fiction technology of the fifties and sixties).
I have a hard
John Mikes writes:
would it be too strenuous to briefly (and understandably???)
summarize a position on time which is in the 'spirit' of the
'spirited' members of this list?
It seems to me that there are two views of time which we have considered,
which I would classify as the Schmidhuber and
From: Osher Doctorow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sat. Aug. 31, 2002 9:52PM
Hal Finney, John Mikes, and the others on the parts of this thread that I
have read have contributed some interesting ideas and questions.
I have not read the *time* articles in Scientific American, but I would like
to put in a
In the Schmidhuber model, the ordering of program outputs is rather
incidental - in fact the dovetailer program could output a completely
different order of outputs, but the output is still equivalent.
As you say in the last paragraph, time really enters the system in the
Tegmark sense of being
6 matches
Mail list logo