Caveat: This post will likely demonstrate my complete lack of advanced
physics education.
But here goes anyway.
Is it possible to model gravity as space being filled with an
all-directional flux of inverse gravitons? These would be
particles which:
1. Zoom around EVERYWHERE with a uniform
Hi there,
Well, it is a good try, but it has been proven wrong already indeed.
To see a better refutal, see Feynman's popular book 'QED'.
For instance, that theory seems even better once you realize that it
also acounts for the inverse-square law.
But the main flaw, if I recall it, is that
Without inventing an i-graviton the idea has been put forward by a
late collegue of mine Dr. Istvan Vas of Hungary, in the early 1950s.
He spoke about a push without identifying its nature - as a force, because
a general pull is 'counterproductive' an difficult to explain, as Newton's
concerns
Eric Hawthorne, [EMAIL PROTECTED], writes:
Is it possible to model gravity as space being filled with an
all-directional flux of inverse gravitons?
Again, this is not really a multiverse question. I hate to be negative,
but there are other forums for exploring nonstandard physics concepts.
Eric,
It may not explain gravity but your phenomenon seems strikingly similar
(with its repulsive push picture) to the concept of cosmological constant or
quintessence, which has a great deal (it is believed) to do with the
expanding universe and its fate. See
Oops, I realize that it wasn't in 'QED' but in the 'Lectures' that I
read that...
- Original Message -
From: Eric Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 10:18 AM
Subject: Fw: Gravity Carrier - could gravity be push with shadows not pull?
A lot of terminology here that I'm not familiar with. I'd have to be
convinced that its worth the effort of learning this language before I
could pass a comment on this proposal.
Cheers
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:08:25AM -0500, Stephen Paul King
Hal Finney wrote:
Again, this is not really a multiverse question. I hate to be negative,
but there are other forums for exploring nonstandard physics concepts.
Alright I take your chastisement somewhat, while also grumbling a bit
about list-fascism.
For one thing it's possible that such a
Eric Cavalcanti wrote:
But the main flaw, if I recall it, is that objects moving around in space
would feel a larger flux of 'iGravitons' coming against the direction
of movement, causing a decrease in velocity. So much for inertia...
Ok but let's say (for fun) that the iGravitons were all
Ron:
do you believe there are non-virtual gravitons?
John Mikes
- Original Message -
From: Ron McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Black Holes and Gravity Carrier
Combine my response to 2 responses grin...
On 17
10 matches
Mail list logo
