OUR recent explanations of OUR poorly understood
observations on THIS little muddy planet during the past split second
of its churnings?
John Mikes
- Original Message -
From: "scerir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:07 AM
Su
From: "Eric Hawthorne"
> One of the issues is the computational complexity of "running all the
> possible i.e. definable programs" to create an informational multiverse
> out of which consistent, metric, regular, observable info-universes
> emerge. If computation takes energy (as it undeniably
Eric Hawthorne wrote:
So probably, the "extra-universal" notion of "computing all the
universe simulations" is not traditional computation
at all. I prefer to think of the state of affairs as being that the
multiverse substrate is just kind of like a
very large, passive qubitstring memory, cap
Eric Hawthorne writes:
> One of the issues is the computational complexity of "running all the
> possible i.e. definable programs" to
> create an informational multiverse out of which consistent, metric,
> regular, observable info-universes
> emerge. If computation takes energy (as it undeniably
Georges Quenot writes:
I do not believe in either case that a simulation with this level
of detail can be conducted on any computer that can be built in
our universe (I mean a computer able to simulate a universe
containing a smaller computer doing the calculation you considered
with a
5 matches
Mail list logo
