ing-list@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My model, comp, and the Second Law
I can't wait to dig into this.
On Friday, January 27, 2017 at 7:02:13 PM UTC-5, hal Ruhl wrote:
Hi Everyone:
Its been a while since I posted.
I would like to start a thread to discuss the Second Law of
Thermody
:08 PM
To: Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: My model, comp, and the Second Law
I can't wait to dig into this.
On Friday, January 27, 2017 at 7:02:13 PM UTC-5, hal Ruhl wrote:
Hi Everyone:
Its been a while since I posted.
I would like to start a
My initial thoughts looking at your first ref in the old posts, is that you
should read The Monadology in the light of your theory, and tell me what
you think about that.
On Friday, January 27, 2017 at 7:02:13 PM UTC-5, hal Ruhl wrote:
>
>
> Hi Everyone:
>
> Its been a while since I posted.
>
>
I can't wait to dig into this.
On Friday, January 27, 2017 at 7:02:13 PM UTC-5, hal Ruhl wrote:
>
>
> Hi Everyone:
>
> Its been a while since I posted.
>
> I would like to start a thread to discuss the Second Law of Thermodynamics
> and the possibility that its origins can be found in perhaps
Hi Everyone:
Its been a while since I posted.
I would like to start a thread to discuss the Second Law of Thermodynamics
and the possibility that its origins can be found in perhaps my model, or
comp, or their combination.
As references I will start with use are:
"Time's Arrow: The Origin of
5 matches
Mail list logo