Re: [Evolution] Future emails

2005-08-24 Thread Not Zed
Umm, i showed direct evidence that it wasn't anything to do with evolution. Date: is the only header evolution creates, and they are all correct. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 10:21 -0400, Jeremey Wise wrote: So the question still stands. What is the resolution to fix Evolution. As you saw in the

Re: [Evolution] Future emails

2005-08-24 Thread Not Zed
Your example messages are not the same in only 1 way - the path they take to their destination. That is the cause. Not the client creating the messages. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, i showed direct evidence that it wasn't anything to do with evolution. Date: is

Re: [Evolution] Future emails

2005-08-24 Thread Jeremey Wise
Hmm. Maybe the issue is that the time zone is set to New_York but no mention of Daylight savings time etc. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, i showed direct evidence that it wasn't anything to do with evolution. Date: is the only header evolution creates, and they are

Re: [Evolution] Future emails

2005-08-24 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
that setting is calendar-only. the mailer uses the system time and the system timezone Jeremey Wise wrote: Hmm. Maybe the issue is that the time zone is set to New_York but no mention of Daylight savings time etc. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, i showed direct

Re: [Evolution] Future emails

2005-08-23 Thread Not Zed
Hmm, both of those messages are identical within a few minutes. What time, exactly, are you talking about? Also, FWIW, the mailer only uses your system timezone. From the 'bad' message: Received: from 172.27.16.164 ([172.27.16.164]) by dcex1.pios.com ([172.25.15.51]) with Microsoft