Re: [Evolution] Memory leak in 2.0.3-1.2 ?

2005-01-29 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Hi, Yesterday I've updated to evo 2.0.3-1.2 from debian unstable. Didn't have any issues with memory leaks. Evo has been running for over a day now. I use cyrus imap with over 500 thousand messages in just about 100 folders. The memory usage staid at about 4.5% of 1 gig, and it is still the same.

Re: [Evolution] Memory leak in 2.0.3-1.2 ?

2005-01-28 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 12:23 +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: I am using 2.0.3-1.2 from Debian Unstable and I now find Evolution ending up hogging abnormal amounts of memory after running a few hours. I use it to access my rather large IMAP account (5 messages in 150 folders - about 2 GB).

Re: [Evolution] Memory leak in 2.0.3-1.2 ?

2005-01-28 Thread Joel Esler
Yes. After running for a long time, evolution will run at high memory usage rates. (i also run IMAP) I just close it and restart. clears it up. On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 12:23 +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: I am using 2.0.3-1.2 from Debian Unstable and I now find Evolution ending up hogging

Re: [Evolution] Memory leak in 2.0.3-1.2 ?

2005-01-28 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 08:30 -0500, Joel Esler wrote: Yes. After running for a long time, evolution will run at high memory usage rates. (i also run IMAP) I just close it and restart. clears it up. Yes it does clear it up, but I guess it is a bug nonetheless... Does anyone have anything to

Re: [Evolution] Memory leak in 2.0.3-1.2 ?

2005-01-28 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:22 +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 08:30 -0500, Joel Esler wrote: Yes. After running for a long time, evolution will run at high memory usage rates. (i also run IMAP) I just close it and restart. clears it up. Yes it does clear it up, but

Re: [Evolution] Memory leak in 2.0.3-1.2 ?

2005-01-28 Thread Not Zed
Maybe this bug covers it: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=69757 Oddly enough, I had this open in mozilla from yesterday. On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:22 +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 08:30 -0500, Joel Esler wrote: Yes. After running for a long time,