Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-02-16 Thread Not Zed
Well i dont think that was made very clear, i.e. that not sharing the camel session is a critical shortcomming. I didn't want the sun engineers or redhat engineers getting all excited and trying install the patch, when it wouldn't work too well! Thats all! Understood. Is it feasible to

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-02-16 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 14:02 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote: On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 09:32 +0800, Not Zed wrote: On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:19 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:34 +0800, Not Zed wrote: I don't see how any such patch could possibly work very well, so i wouldn't get

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-02-16 Thread Not Zed
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:19 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:34 +0800, Not Zed wrote: I don't see how any such patch could possibly work very well, so i wouldn't get too excited about it. Why not? As noted the main thing is the two separate camel sessions. Yes, two

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-02-10 Thread JP Rosevear
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 09:32 +0800, Not Zed wrote: On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:19 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:34 +0800, Not Zed wrote: I don't see how any such patch could possibly work very well, so i wouldn't get too excited about it. Why not? As noted the main thing is

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-02-10 Thread JP Rosevear
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 08:53 +0800, Not Zed wrote: On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 14:02 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote: On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 09:32 +0800, Not Zed wrote: On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:19 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:34 +0800, Not Zed wrote: I don't see how any such patch

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-02-09 Thread JP Rosevear
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:34 +0800, Not Zed wrote: I don't see how any such patch could possibly work very well, so i wouldn't get too excited about it. Why not? As noted the main thing is the two separate camel sessions. There could be other issues I suppose, I only did cursory testing.

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-02-07 Thread Calvin Liu
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 23:51, JP Rosevear wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 08:59 -0500, Brett Anderson wrote: What version of bonobo have you had success with? 2.8 is what I tested with, note thought that you still need a small patch on the Evolution side. Where's the patch? - Calvin -JP --

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-02-01 Thread Brett Anderson
What version of bonobo have you had success with? On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 19:50 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 14:22 -0500, Brett Anderson wrote: JP, I am running evolution 2.0.2. At what version were you able to actually start another evolution instance on two different

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-02-01 Thread JP Rosevear
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 08:59 -0500, Brett Anderson wrote: What version of bonobo have you had success with? 2.8 is what I tested with, note thought that you still need a small patch on the Evolution side. -JP -- JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc.

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-01-31 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 12:58 -0500, Brett Anderson wrote: Hello, I have been digging around on mailing lists about this, but haven't been able to come up with any good answers. Essentially, I want to be able to start up evolution on my machine at work, go home, and then be able to ssh into

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-01-31 Thread JP Rosevear
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 12:58 -0500, Brett Anderson wrote: Hello, I have been digging around on mailing lists about this, but haven't been able to come up with any good answers. Essentially, I want to be able to start up evolution on my machine at work, go home, and then be able to ssh into

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-01-31 Thread Brett Anderson
JP, I am running evolution 2.0.2. At what version were you able to actually start another evolution instance on two different displays? What version are you running? Brett On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 14:00 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 12:58 -0500, Brett Anderson wrote: Hello,

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-01-31 Thread Michael R Head
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 14:00 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: Originally it was bonobo, now the only real reason is that the camel session does not get shared (I have a patch in my tree for this). So if you mark a message as read in a local mail box (ie POP) the view on the other display does not

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-01-31 Thread Dan Stromberg
I use VNC a lot for this, but if I were starting over, I'd seriously think about putting my time into FreeNX. Anyway, with VNC I can see the same desktop from both my offices, from home, and in any old 802.11b hotspot I can connect to from my PalmOne Tungsten C, which has a half-power 802.11b

Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

2005-01-31 Thread JP Rosevear
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 14:22 -0500, Brett Anderson wrote: JP, I am running evolution 2.0.2. At what version were you able to actually start another evolution instance on two different displays? What version are you running? I played with in 2.1, but it should work in 2.0 and possibly 1.4