Re: [Evolution] Re: mail options
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 13:31 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: Return Receipt, Priority Message Read Receipt are very useful when used judiciously, and I'm glad they are being implemented. If by return receipt you mean the Return-Receipt-To: header then this should not be implemented under any
Re: [Evolution] Stupid MUA Behavior (Trash)
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:53:05 -0500 From: Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 17:27 +0100, Paul Leyland wrote: I'm still smarting over losing 11 days of mail through a combination of incompetence and unfamiliarity with an email client. When on vacation a few weeks
Re: [Evolution] Stupid MUA Behavior (Trash)
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 11:19 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Jeffrey D. Means wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 10:09 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 07:45 -0600, Jeffrey D. Means wrote: Why is it that when using Evolution
Re: [Evolution] Future emails
Umm, i showed direct evidence that it wasn't anything to do with evolution. Date: is the only header evolution creates, and they are all correct. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 10:21 -0400, Jeremey Wise wrote: So the question still stands. What is the resolution to fix Evolution. As you saw in the
Re: [Evolution] Future emails
Your example messages are not the same in only 1 way - the path they take to their destination. That is the cause. Not the client creating the messages. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, i showed direct evidence that it wasn't anything to do with evolution. Date: is
Re: [Evolution] Future emails
Hmm. Maybe the issue is that the time zone is set to New_York but no mention of Daylight savings time etc. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, i showed direct evidence that it wasn't anything to do with evolution. Date: is the only header evolution creates, and they are
Re: [Evolution] evolution connector for Sun java enterprise calendar server
Are there stable linux rpm or tar.gz packages? cvs is beyond my noob level --- Harry Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes. But you might need to build for yourself. You can checkout the code from cvs.gnome.org. The module name is evolution-jescs. Harry coverup c wrote: Does there
Re: [Evolution] Future emails
that setting is calendar-only. the mailer uses the system time and the system timezone Jeremey Wise wrote: Hmm. Maybe the issue is that the time zone is set to New_York but no mention of Daylight savings time etc. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, i showed direct
[Evolution] there's no contact list utility in my evolution client!!
watta strange thing...I'm running evolution 2.2.1.1 -with all the depencencies- on a slackware 10.1 (linux2.6.0) distro. Every seems to be just ok: can send and recive mails from multiple acconuts..but there's no refference to the contact list in the entire mail client.. not in the main menu nor
Re: [Evolution] Re: mail options
If by return receipt you mean the Return-Receipt-To: header then this should not be implemented under any circumstances. Thankfully very few MTAs handle this now because it is a serious security problem - for example:- * Say I had put that header on this message. However the address
Re: [Evolution] Error loading addressbook
Try $E2K_BRBUG=4 your install prefix/ libexec/evolution-exchange-storage-x.y.z ? Exchange Calendar is working for you? -Sushma. On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 14:42 +0400, got ya wrote: Hi, I've followed the instructions as per http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/bugs.shtml, nothing happened.
Re: [Evolution] Evolution + exchange 5.5
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 14:56 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 14:24 +0200, Philippe Béziat wrote: Hello Is there a solution to connect Evolution to exchange 5.5 ? Yes, (soon) there is. Snapshot for Evolution 2.4 here:
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Strange console messages when accessing e-d-s through the libecal C API
My original reply said this was probably because the code isn't running in a main loop. It therefore has no proper way to handle idle-processed return corba calls if they come in after an invocation returns. I think the eds objects use idle-return processing for its calls, not threads.
Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP4REV1
Well, I don't have any stake in it remember. I'm moving to hula. The disksummary branch has a completely new imap implementation, unrelated to either of those; i dont intend on working on anything else after 2.4 is released. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 10:45 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: hey
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Strange console messages when accessing e-d-s through the libecal C API
On 8/24/05, Not Zed notzed@ximian.com wrote: Duh, of course. You can't just 'run it once'. It has to keep running. i.e. all your code has to run *under* that stack point, or if not, that stack point has to keep running whilst you run things in other threads. I guess I need much more
[Evolution-hackers] Compiling evolution-jescs on SuSE 9.3
2005-08-24
Thread
Per-Olof Litby - Practice Mgr - Software - Central/North Europe - Sun Microsystems
Greetings, I've checked out this module from cvs and I'm trying to build it on my SuSE 9.3 Professional system with Evolution 2.2.1. When I run the configure script, I get an error message saying that the evolution development libraries are not installed, which isn't correct. I have:
Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP4REV1
Hey, So personally i think we should disable/remove imap4 too and only because maintaining two implementations of IMAP without having *written* either is rather hard. And since we need to pick one which is closest to feature completion i guess IMAP would have to be the one. A migration
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compiling evolution-jescs on SuSE 9.3
I've checked out this module from cvs and I'm trying to build it on my SuSE 9.3 Professional system with Evolution 2.2.1. When I run the configure script, I get an error message saying that the evolution development libraries are not installed, which isn't correct. I have: evolution
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compiling evolution-jescs on SuSE 9.3
2005-08-24
Thread
Per-Olof Litby - Practice Mgr - Software - Central/North Europe - Sun Microsystems
guenther wrote: I've checked out this module from cvs and I'm trying to build it on my SuSE 9.3 Professional system with Evolution 2.2.1. When I run the configure script, I get an error message saying that the evolution development libraries are not installed, which isn't correct. I have:
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compiling evolution-jescs on SuSE 9.3
From packages? From SuSE packages. Installed via YaST. Evolution CVS HEAD needs e-d-s CVS HEAD, not the stable one... You need to be more verbose here You are trying to build an unstable CVS HEAD version, right? And it tells you, you are missing dependencies... Well, CVS HEAD often
[Evolution-hackers] ANNOUNCE : Evolution 2.3.8 Release
Hi All, The Evolution Team is pleased to announce the release of Evolution 2.3.8. You can download the following : http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/evolution/2.3/evolution-2.3.8.tar.gz http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/evolution-exchange/2.3/evolution-exchange-2.3.8.tar.gz
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Strange console messages when accessing e-d-s through the libecal C API
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 19:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/24/05, Not Zed notzed@ximian.com wrote: Duh, of course. You can't just 'run it once'. It has to keep running. i.e. all your code has to run *under* that stack
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compiling evolution-jescs on SuSE 9.3
Currently the evolution-jescs from CVS HEAD is for Evolution 2.2.x. We will make a branch from Evolution 2.2.x and make the HEAD for Evolution 2.4 sometime later, maybe in a month. Please run pkg-config --cflags evolution-shell-2.2 in your command. Can you get some useful messages or a package
