Re: [Evolution] Threaded mail display during delete

2003-01-23 Thread Not Zed
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 03:42, guenther wrote: cheers(); When I receive a batch of email and begin reading (and deleting) messages I've noticed that as I delete mails from a thread the subsequent messages within the thread jump around in the list to try to stay within correct date sort.

Re: [Evolution] IMAP rewrite

2003-01-30 Thread Not Zed
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 07:17, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: Hi Timo, On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 00:43, Timo Sirainen wrote: I remember reading something of IMAP rewrite, how far did that get? Is there still a chance of getting that soon? I'm thinking of fixing the IMAP code myself soon, unless

Re: [Evolution] Bug-Buddy submit fails :- Fwd: [Warning: could notsend message for past 4 hours]

2003-02-02 Thread Not Zed
Are outgoing port 25 connections blocked by your isp/firewall perhaps? On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 21:04, Paul Hands wrote: Hi Ximian folks, The attached message is the usual response I get when trying to submit bugs via bug buddy. So far, it's just deferred delivery, but eventually, like

Re: [Evolution] Problems with inbox folder

2003-02-02 Thread Not Zed
What exactly do you mean, they're all grey? On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 04:15, Rory D. Hudson wrote: Hello out there…. I really like evolution but I am currently having a problem that is causing huge issues for me. J In my Inbox screen the messages are all grey…meaning I cannot see them,

Re: [Evolution] Unable to activate HTML editor component worksfor one user not another

2003-02-02 Thread Not Zed
Check that there aren't files in /tmp/orbit-* owned by the wrong userid or similar. Though that would probably mean almost nothing worked for the user. On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 11:24, Mike Stilson wrote: The subject line describes it well. I installed evolution (and everything else) from

Re: [Evolution] Virtual Folders in Summary Display

2003-02-02 Thread Not Zed
This sounds like a bug that i found in the 1.3 code. I think a patch was applied to 1.2.x as well for it, but i'm not sure. On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 17:50, Bill Hartwell wrote: What does it take to get Evolution to keep your selected virtual folders in the summary display between sessions? Every

Re: [Evolution] Check for new messages in all folders

2003-02-02 Thread Not Zed
The normal behaviour should be to check all messages in all folders i believe. On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 00:40, Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: On an IMAP account, in the receiving options tab of the Evolution account editor, there is a Check for new messages in all folders check-box. If I have

Re: [Evolution] Can I *send* a message flagged for follow-up?

2003-02-02 Thread Not Zed
Yep, the answer is no. You cannot. If we did it, it would only work with other users of evolution anyway, and they might not want spammers using something like that to annoy them either. On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 07:25, Lee A. Smith wrote: I have a question related to the use of a follow-up flag.

Re: [Evolution] error downloading RDF

2003-02-03 Thread Not Zed
evolution's proxy settings are controlled via the gnome-vfs control-center crapplet, not environmental variables (sigh). Try looking through the archive of this list for more information, or on support.ximian.com On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 11:10, Frank Wegmann wrote: Am Son, 2003-02-02 um 21.46

Re: [Evolution] How to delete attachment from saved message

2003-02-05 Thread Not Zed
A couple of reasons: - mail stores are basically write only, you can't edit a message without creating a new one and deleting the old one, which causes a few other problems - disk is cheap - mailboxes are more reliable than pst files - disk is cheap etc. I guess it kinda depends on just how

Re: [Evolution] Send Later?

2003-02-06 Thread Not Zed
Generally users found this counter-intuitive, so it's been removed. Actually when you send a message it is always appended to outbox first, and then outbox is flushed if you are in online mode. If you're in offline mode, then it is just appended to the outbox, etc. If you really want to send

Re: [Evolution] Mozilla mail into Evolution

2003-02-06 Thread Not Zed
If you're using 1.2 or greater you can just add a new account of type standard unix mbox spool or directory and point that to mail stored anywhere. Note that you probably wouldn't want to run both apps on the same mail folders though, unless you use maildir. On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 06:03, Carl

Re: [Evolution] Can I copy all data and configuration from Red Hatto SuSE?

2003-02-09 Thread Not Zed
Yes, it would be related to paths. Filters and a bunch of other things currently store full paths to folders in their config files. Some can be fixed with a search and replace of the files, but some config data is encoded so isn't that easy to change. On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 20:47, Mertens Bram

Re: [Evolution] Evo multiple retrieves from POP

2003-02-09 Thread Not Zed
You might want to check that that option is still set in the settings. On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 06:52, Carsten Zerbst wrote: Hello List, I'm using the pop option don't delete mails on server for one pop account. This made no problems since version 0.99, but with the recent one evolution

Re: [Evolution] vFolder on Header

2003-02-13 Thread Not Zed
Yes, its not there intentionally. To make vfolders more efficient, they mostly only work on in-memory data which only includes some specific headers. On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 18:43, Andrew Cowie wrote: Is it just me, or is the Specific Header selection missing from the vFolder search criteria

Re: [Evolution] quoted-printable

2003-02-13 Thread Not Zed
did you report this before? evolution is fully mime 1.0 compliant wrt to content encodings. if it doesn't display properly it could be anything, from invalidly formatted mail, to incorrect character set, etc. On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 18:22, Rafal Suchowirski wrote: hello sometimes i have a

Re: [Evolution] wierd vfolder naming problem

2003-02-16 Thread Not Zed
Just use the vfolder editor to rename it. If it doesn't appear right, try restarting evo. It is a sort of hidden feature, the code supports multiple levels of vfolders (not a heirarchy of vfolder rules though), but the editor doesn't yet. On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 09:38, Arthur S. Alexion wrote: I

Re: [Evolution] vFolder

2003-02-16 Thread Not Zed
Using vfolder shoudlnt' really have any effect whatsoever on redraw performance, unless you are getting a lot of new mail very often, and even then, the vfolder updates are for the most part, very fast (any rule using a 'body' search is the slowest). Although they do use a fair bit of memory, so

Re: [Evolution] Problem compiling latest CVS version of gal.

2003-02-16 Thread Not Zed
what platform? On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 06:54, Michael-John Anthony wrote: Hey all, I'm compiling the latest CVS version of Evolution and have gotten unstuck. When compiling gal, I get: Undefined first referenced symbol in file

Re: [Evolution] Creating Folders in Evolution for IMAP account

2003-02-17 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 05:16, Richard S. Crawford wrote: I've got an IMAP server running on my computer, and I've been using Evolution lately to pull the mail from the IMAP folders into Evolution's own folders. Now, though, I'd like to point Evolution directly at the IMAP folders, just to

Re: [Evolution] Evo memory use

2003-02-17 Thread Not Zed
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 20:54, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 02:30, Not Zed wrote: evolution stores a subset of the headers of every message of every opened folder in memory. Note that when Evolution is separated from the IMAP server by a slow WAN link, the mere fact

Re: [Evolution] Evo memory use

2003-02-17 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 11:06, guenther wrote: cheers( Not Zed ); evolution stores a subset of the headers of every message of every opened folder in memory. if you have a shitload of messages in many folders that you've visited in the session, AND/OR are the source of vfolders (i.e

Re: [Evolution] Filtering on contacts

2003-02-17 Thread Not Zed
You should howver, NOT access the db file directly. You should go through the wombat addressbook api's which serialises access and maintains data integrity properly. On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 02:19, Enver ALTIN wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 17:28, John Harlow wrote: Can anyone point to info on

Re: [Evolution] POP3 issue

2003-02-17 Thread Not Zed
That 'bug' wouldn't cause this problem unless the server is adding headers, the fallback code should still work. It may not even have anything to do with it, depending on the server. Are there any differences in the headers from the two copies of the messages downloaded? e.g. additional Status

Re: [Evolution] Questions about the integration of anti-spammeasures in our mail client ??

2003-02-17 Thread Not Zed
You can already use most of these anti-spam programs, if they have a script, or one can be written, which returns a return code based on a message input from stdin. This can be run via filters and the return code checked. This is how personally i'd like to see it continue to work, although

Re: [Evolution] Problem compiling latest CVS version of gal.

2003-02-18 Thread Not Zed
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 03:24, Dan Winship wrote: On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 19:53, Michael-John Anthony wrote: Oops - Solaris 8, Sparc. I had the same problem on OS X. The fix is to add -lX11 explicitly to the link line for libwidgets.al. (Although really, the right fix is to make e-cell-text

Re: [Evolution] Evo memory use

2003-02-18 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 18:44, William Pietri wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 23:30, Not Zed wrote: Note that when Evolution is separated from the IMAP server by a slow WAN link, the mere fact that it thinks it's necessary to fetch the headers for _every_ message even in the mailbox(es

Re: [Evolution] Filters not working on IMAP server

2003-02-19 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 07:38, Alex Malinovich wrote: On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 14:09, Alex Malinovich wrote: --snip-- The only other idea that I have has to do with my IMAP server. Courier creates a default INBOX folder which stores EVERYTHING. All of your other folders become subfolders of

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.3 compiles, but doesn't run.

2003-02-20 Thread Not Zed
Probably a backtrace of where it crashes, i.e. run it in gdb (or whatever debugger you have available), and get a backtrace of all threads when it crashes. In gdb the command is 'thread apply all bt'. Create a bug on bugzilla.ximian.com and paste the backtrace into it. On Thu, 2003-02-20 at

Re: [Evolution] Problem compiling latest CVS version of gal.

2003-02-20 Thread Not Zed
: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [evolution] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/1.3/1.3/evolution/shell' - M. On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 11:11, Not Zed wrote: On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 03:24, Dan Winship wrote: On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 19:53, Michael-John Anthony wrote: Oops

Re: [Evolution] training spam filters

2003-02-21 Thread Not Zed
we do have plans for extensibility scripting. although the plan is that we have no plans, yet want to do it. :-/ On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 19:47, Eamonn Hamilton wrote: Hi. I'm wondering if anybody has come up with a quick way of training bayesian-type spam filters from the evolution gui? I

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Problem

2003-02-19 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 09:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to connect to my IMAP server and get the following error: Unexpected response from IMAP server: THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT run CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 evolution-mail in a terminal, then run evolution you

Re: [Evolution] Re:Evolution 1.2.1 shows Euro sign in subject(¤) line but not in message body??

2003-02-21 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 03:58, Adrian Collett wrote: Hi, i too have this problem. I've searched the archives and checked that i am using iso-8859-15 fonts everywhere but still in the body of the message i do not get a symbol !! It sounds like either the fonts for the gtkhtml component

Re: [Evolution] Can not compse messages after upgrade to 1.2.2

2003-02-24 Thread Not Zed
maybe try oaf-slay, not just killev. and if that doesn't work, try rm -rf /tmp/orbit-* as root. On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 14:32, Ralph Sanford wrote: This afternoon I noticed that ftp.ximian had evolution 1.2.2 for SuSE 8.1 and I tried to upgrade the computer using SuSE 8.1 to the latest

Re: [Evolution] Font strangeness in 1.3.

2003-02-24 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 17:46, David Woodhouse wrote: Sorry for starting a thread by replying to a message. A screenshot of Evolution displaying the message to which I'm replying can be seen at http://www.infradead.org/~dwmw2/evo-font-strangeness.jpeg Note the bizarre fonts. Didn't happen

Re: [Evolution] Font strangeness in 1.3.

2003-02-24 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 20:08, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 09:29, Not Zed wrote: Note the bizarre fonts. Didn't happen here, fwiw. Although it looks like it may be something to do with the html conversion of the content, which adds url links and the like, perhaps its

Re: [Evolution] Threaded order unconsidered during deletion

2003-02-23 Thread Not Zed
Have you sorted the list as well? The behaviour in 1.2 is different to 1.0.x, as it wont jump around when you delete messages, it will stick to the same thread till its run out, and then go to the next message. If you've sorted by date ... well then you get the next by date, at the same level as

Re: [Evolution] can't open Inbox in Evol 1.2.1

2003-02-23 Thread Not Zed
sounds like evolution-mail crashed. run it in another terminal (evolution-mail) before starting evolution, maybe it'll dump a reason as to why it crashed, or you can get a backtrace of it. (search for 'backtrace' on the ximian knowledge base under support.ximian.com). On Mon, 2003-02-24 at

Re: [Evolution] Bad gpg signature

2003-02-24 Thread Not Zed
my guess is that it has something to do with trying to put terminal control codes in your mail signature. apart from being bad netiqutte, i dont see why this would cause problems though, maybe hitting some evo bug. On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 06:52, Stuart Luppescu wrote: This is really driving me

Re: [Evolution] Filtering on Received: header

2003-02-24 Thread Not Zed
open a bug on bugzilla.ximian.com and attach a specific example mail and the filters file that is supposed to match it. On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 07:42, Norman P. B. Joseph wrote: Filtering on the Received: header doesn't appear to be working for me (1.2.2 on RH 8.0). The filter rule seems

Re: [Evolution] imap: evolution and eudora; moving files to trashfolder

2003-02-23 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 09:34, Dan Winship wrote: The issue is that IMAP doesn't have a move command, so what Eudora is doing is copying the message to your trash folder, marking it deleted in the inbox, and then expunging all deleted messages from inbox. This is why deleting any message from

Re: [Evolution] Mail: 'open in external viewer' not working

2003-02-23 Thread Not Zed
Maybe suse have patched gnome to work closer with kde in this regard ... in which case, go ask them if it doesn't work :) On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 17:21, Adolfo Bello wrote: On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 00:13, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 18:06, Adolfo Bello wrote: Under KDE, go to

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.3: No reminders

2003-02-23 Thread Not Zed
Just curious... So, the config.xmldb file is no longer referenced at all by 1.3? That would be real helpful so that if 1.3 gets into an unusable state from some CVS changes, I could just run 1.2.2 using that same directory - instead of swapping ~/evolution directories like I have been doing.

Re: [Evolution] mozilla and evolution

2003-02-23 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 04:25, Reg HUGHSON wrote: I know that evolution depends on some files from mozilla. I am running mozilla 1.2.1 and evolution 1.2.2. I installed mozilla 1.3b and that prevented evolution from loading (error - cannot initialize configuration database - or something like

Re: [Evolution] How are deleted messages marked?

2003-02-26 Thread Not Zed
For maildir, you check the T flag in the filename. For mbox, the flags are stored in the X-Evolution header as a 4 byte hexadecimal number. The deleted flag is bit #1, or 0x02. See camel/camel-folder-summary.h for a list of the main flags, and

Re: [Evolution] List Folders (The Bat! feature)

2003-02-26 Thread Not Zed
I'm pretty sure both of them are in bugzilla somewhere. On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 06:26, Bill Hartwell wrote: On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 08:28, Enver ALTIN wrote: Hi, I noticed that most folders on my local inbox I created are for mailing-lists. When I want to send a message to the list, I

Re: [Evolution] Why I love Evolution

2003-02-26 Thread Not Zed
I dunno, Miss Evo might be ok as a fling or a friend, but be careful, and don't go any further ... you'll go grey, put on weight, get moody, generally lose the will to live ... :) On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 06:39, guenther wrote: 1.2.1, in this case. In spite of its recognized multiple warts and

Re: [Evolution] HTTP Proxy for downloading images.

2003-02-27 Thread Not Zed
as stated earlier, it is in the gnome config settings, thety're not stored in gconf for gnome 1 On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:14, Camron W. Fox wrote: On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 07:29, Mark Gordon wrote: On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 04:08, Erik Bågfors wrote: On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 01:31, Camron W. Fox

Re: [Evolution] mouse equivalent?

2003-02-27 Thread Not Zed
only the menu ... actions - go to - next unread message. maybe set the unread timeout a little higher, so skipping over messages doesn't instantly read them? or just tap ] faster/change your key repeat timeout? On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 02:29, Dan Stromberg wrote: Is there a mouse equivalent for

Re: [Evolution] how to reassign 'default' colour to messages?

2003-03-02 Thread Not Zed
If you're using a local mailbox you will probably have to write a script to remove the colours from the X-Evolution header. Looking at the filter options, it looks like there's some cleanup required, wrt colours vs labels, etc. Maybe we should make labels completely configurable and have that

Re: [Evolution] cannot connect to my mail server (jumpline,virtual)

2003-03-02 Thread Not Zed
)' Got + response POP3_STREAM_LINE(END) POP3_STREAM_WRITE(6): QUIT POP3_STREAM_LINE(20): '+OK Updated mailbox.' Got + response ** end of mail check. Thanks for your assistance. -- Bret - Original Message - From: Not Zed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc

Re: [Evolution] Using filter to forward attachments

2003-03-02 Thread Not Zed
Yeah this is correct. We never implemented a forward-to filter action. Not sure why exactly ... About the only way is to setup an 'incoming filter' which has a matching criteria of pipe message to shell command which does its own processing of stdin. If you do something like rule: Subject

Re: [Evolution] Outbox problem

2003-03-05 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 08:57, guenther wrote: cheers(); Well, in theory, sendmail should keep the outgoing message in the spool queue until it can deliver the mail. Eventually, it will send you back an email telling you that it's having trouble, and will keep trying for x days (usually

Re: [Evolution] new mail notification not working?

2003-03-04 Thread Not Zed
Its not requirred for pop or local delivery, they are by default always filtered. As i said, a few weeks ago, somewhere, the mechanism used isn't very reliable, and we need to change it some time ... :-/ On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 11:25, Bill Hartwell wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 08:37, Brendan

Re: [Evolution] Any tarballs of 1.3 snapshots?

2003-03-09 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 06:42, J. Gardner Biggs wrote: I tried installing the snapshots via red-carpet on my RedHat 8.x (phoebe) system and ended up hosing the rpm database. try rpm --rebuilddb Any luck on the snapshots being released in tarball form? evolution gal gtkhtml libsoup may as

Re: [Evolution] new mail notification not working?

2003-03-09 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 22:43, Pete Biggs wrote: On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 01:02, Not Zed wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 20:11, Pete Biggs wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 01:55, Not Zed wrote: Its not requirred for pop or local delivery, they are by default always filtered. That's

Re: [Evolution] How to configure Evo's toolbar?

2003-03-09 Thread Not Zed
Sorry, no idea :-/ On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 23:15, D. D. Brierton wrote: On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 01:24, Not Zed wrote: I think there's an option in the gnome or gtk settings for how toolbars are displayed by default, i think bonobo honours that, but i'm not sure According to one response

Re: [Evolution] disappearing Date column

2003-03-11 Thread Not Zed
Perhaps Ximian could increase the distance required to drag the item before removing it, so it doesn't happen accidentally... but anyway, I'll bet that's what's going on. If you really consider this an issue you could file a wishlist bug on bugzilla.ximian.com to suggest they change it.

Re: [Evolution] Evolution and time handling

2003-03-10 Thread Not Zed
Now if the good folk at Evolution would let us have a header file as well as a signature, we could tell the MicroScheiss users that we are on GMT and not to spam us with emails that our emails are arriving five hours before they are sent (because we are GMT). Huh? What sort of header file?

Re: [Evolution] Help building CVS evolution on GNOME2.2

2003-03-13 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 15:31, Biswapesh Chattopadhyay wrote: Hi First post so excuse me if this is stupid: Can someone give me some pointers on above ? I've have latest gnome-2-2 branch (jhbuild) + gtkhtml + gal + evolution + CVS mozilla + CVS libical in a subdirectory under evolution +

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.3.1 Preview Release

2003-03-13 Thread Not Zed
Question, I am still thinking about getting the connector, will it work with evo 1.3.1? I dont think the 1.2 version will work with 1.3, you will probably have to wait for a compatible version, which should be around when 1.4 is. Check ximian's site and/or mail sales if you can't find info

Re: [Evolution] Expanding a digest with procmail and showing it asthreaded

2003-03-04 Thread Not Zed
Maybe the digest form doesn't include the required in-reply-to and references headers. Check the headers in the individual messages ... Someome made us turn off using the subject for threading, so you dont even get any fallback, although it probably wouldn't help terribly if in-reply-to and

Re: [Evolution] Bug converting folders

2003-03-04 Thread Not Zed
doesn't make sense, but anyway. can you put a bit more detail on your bug report, like what you did. On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 18:05, Mika Liljeberg wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 01:51, Not Zed wrote: What exactly are you doing converting one format to another? As in convert a mbox to a maildir

Re: [Evolution] Check for new mail at startup

2003-03-04 Thread Not Zed
i guess its possible,it obviously is since you see this behaviour. i dunno could be your servers behaviour isn't properly accounted for in out imap code. we already have lots of workarounds for the fact the imap code is crap atdealing with async stuff from servers :-/ maybe a new imap will fix

Re: [Evolution] SMP Safe?

2003-03-04 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 18:30, Mika Liljeberg wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 01:56, Not Zed wrote: Oh debian. Send them the bug reports then ... they make changes to our code and we can't support it. Hrrm. :-) Well, I checked that. No code changes in the version I'm using, just Debian

Re: [Evolution] 1.3 processes not terminating

2003-03-16 Thread Not Zed
they're meant to stay running so it can popup reminders if you're not running the main app. On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 07:38, Alex Malinovich wrote: I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature, but even after a clean exit from evolution-1.3, two processes are always left running: [EMAIL

Re: [Evolution] SMP Safe?

2003-03-03 Thread Not Zed
it successfully), but i'm not entirely confident of the code, wrt compilation optimisations and whatnot (possibly needs a few volatile's thrown around in certain places). On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 19:59, Mika Liljeberg wrote: On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 05:03, Not Zed wrote: did you submit any bug

Re: [Evolution] Q : Filter for attachments ?

2003-03-20 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 20:22, pulleman wrote: hi all, is it possible to create a filter which deletes attachments ? No. I'm getting bothered by dozens of unwanted vcf, and also everbody in my company is sending a jpg with the company logo inside the mail, by talking about hundreds of mails

Re: [Evolution] Outgoing filter prevent mail outgoing?

2003-03-02 Thread Not Zed
You are correct, outgoing filters are applied after the mail is sent. This hasn't changed in 1.4. On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 12:32, Dagmar d'Surreal wrote: If someone would be willing to confirm, I'd like to know whether or not it's possible to use the Outgoing filters in Evo 1.2.x to actually

Re: [Evolution] Compose message body iso-8859-2 problem

2003-03-02 Thread Not Zed
For the composer you need to set the font with the right encoding via the gtkhtml properties crapplet. You can access this via the font preferences tab in settings, or via the control centre. On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 21:37, Branko Tanovic wrote: I have this kind of problem I use iso-8859-2 on

Re: [Evolution] SMP Safe?

2003-03-02 Thread Not Zed
did you submit any bug reports? On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 22:22, Mika Liljeberg wrote: I'm having plenty of evolution-mail crashes on my SMP machine. Recently about twice a day. Could be thread locking issues that SMP is flushing out. A lot of the crashes seem to be happening in the maildir

Re: [Evolution] Running mail through an external program afterreception

2003-03-02 Thread Not Zed
There's no way to add custom commands to the menu's, you can only move existing commands around. So i dont think there's any way to do this at present. I would probably suggest something like ... - Setup a maildir 'account', pointing to wherever you want, setup 2 folders, one for 'this is

Re: [Evolution] Suggested improvement.

2003-03-05 Thread Not Zed
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 18:32, Mika Liljeberg wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 03:56, Not Zed wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 21:33, Mika Liljeberg wrote: Theoretically yes, but it's not really working that well. For one thing, you can't specify the source folder(s) for the Unmatched vfolder

Re: [Evolution] new mail notification not working?

2003-03-05 Thread Not Zed
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 12:48, Bill Hartwell wrote: That's kind of what I thought. I don't have any audible notification turned on, because it would be dinging me every 10 minutes if I did. On the other hand, I was kind of surprised to see that it's there for the spool account, since that's

Re: [Evolution] Evolution runs, shows in ps, but does show in X?

2003-03-05 Thread Not Zed
what version are you using? if its a 1.3 snapshot, keep trying new ones till they work. On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 16:24, Nolan Garrett wrote: I cant get Evolution to start I mean, it starts, I see the loading screen, and then the loading screen disappears and nothing happens. When I

Re: [Evolution] automagic mail forward -- a solution

2003-03-05 Thread Not Zed
It might be easier just requesting these new things in a bug report. Dunno if they're there already. The code required for a forward-to and shell-with-stdin thing is probably not too much, particularly with some new process code we have. Would probably have to wait till after 1.4 though. On

Re: [Evolution] strange problem with ./autogen.sh

2003-03-12 Thread Not Zed
sounds like pkg-config isn't installed/isn't installed properly, and/or perhaps the development stuff isn't installed. that macro is correct tho, so its some problem outside soup/evo On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 01:10, Ron Smits wrote: Afternoon I recently upgraded to garnome 0.21.2, now when

Re: [Evolution] Import form mbox fails

2003-03-17 Thread Not Zed
sounds like a bug in sylpheed? On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:59, Patrick Marquetecken wrote: Hi, i need to import some mbox files from evolution into Sylpheed. Some mbox files i don't see, and some if i import them they have the wrong files! I have moved the mails in to another subfolder in

Re: [Evolution] Q: Pro and Con Mailboxformats

2003-03-19 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 20:18, pulleman wrote: hi all, has there been a writeup that describes the advantages disadvantages of the various supported mailbox formats ? I know for backups maildir mailh would be better, but anything else ? i would only recommend, 'anything but mh, unless

Re: [Evolution] Unable to receive mail

2003-03-20 Thread Not Zed
you dont have the receive account setup? No idea really. fwiw CVS evolution is only validated against gnome 2.0 + gnome print 2.2. On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 22:31, Biswapesh Chattopadhyay wrote: Using CVS evolution, I can send mails fine but not receive them. 'Send/Receive' shows only 'Send'.

Re: [Evolution] Case sensitive searches?

2003-03-20 Thread Not Zed
Looking at the code, it should still do this for header searches (at least for ascii), but it does appear to be broken. Open a bug report. On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 06:14, Eric Lambart wrote: Sorry, don't know what to tell you. I just confirmed that the search (I tried searching Sender) is

Re: [Evolution] Source RPMs ...

2003-03-20 Thread Not Zed
The evolution guys only prepare tar files. Other ximian packagers generate rpm's and whatnot from that. I'm not sure if they prepare source rpm's for beta's/snapshots. On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 02:48, Ryan P Skadberg wrote: Hey All .. I'd like to try and build RPMs for RH 7.3 with Gnome 2.2,

Re: [Evolution] Unable to retrieve mail after upgrade to XD2

2003-06-11 Thread Not Zed
We've seen this before, it is the pop server at fault, the server will return an truncated response to a CAPA query after login. Its apparently been tested with a manual telnet, so its not our io layer at fault. The pop protocol is pretty simple, so if evolution detects corruption it drops the

Re: [Evolution] Setting 'read' status in Evolution.

2003-06-11 Thread Not Zed
probably an order problem. mark the message then move it once you've moved it, you're just changing the settings on the 'current' message, which isn't the same as the one moved to the move destination. On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 17:52, Panos Platon Tsapralis wrote: I am coming back to my favorite

Re: [Evolution] Problems with 1.4RC1 - Blank mailboxes, betterdebug.

2003-06-11 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 22:45, Jason Slaughter wrote: This happens to me with 1.2.3 sometimes. It seems associated with having just done a search for something within evo, and evo not being willing to give up its narrowed focus at first. I think I usually can solve it hitting enter again

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Issue

2003-06-11 Thread Not Zed
if you run evolution with CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 set in the environment (in evolution 1.2, you need to run evolution-mail with that set, in a terminal, then run evolution normally), you'll get a dump of imap protocol, which will probably show the problem. On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 10:18, Stuart

Re: [Evolution] send/receive race condition on sending mail

2003-06-11 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 01:25, Mike Godfrey wrote: I'm running evo 1.3.92 on redhat 9, but this is a long-standing problem. I read my mail using IMAP over SSL; I send outgoing mail to the same server using SMTP (no SSL). Problem #1: Sometimes, my IMAP connection dies and I get a string of

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4. Only one Mailaccount possible?

2003-06-11 Thread Not Zed
what do you mean by dont exist? they're not in the account list, or they're just not in the folder tree? do they show up in the folder tree after restart? On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 08:29, Thorsten Körner wrote: Hi I've just installed XD2 and Evolution-1.4 to give it a test. When I Try to

Re: [Evolution] Mail lock file for local delivery?

2003-06-11 Thread Not Zed
Have you been using 1.3.92, or upgraded to it? Did you edit your account? There was a bug around the end of 1.3.x development (and in 1.4.0) which breaks local delivery, and the patch missed the 1.4.0 release by a few hours :(. See bug 43974 for details and the patch. Check using: egrep

Re: [Evolution] evo 1.4 GUI is very slow

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
i presume you're not using it remotely? anything showing up in top such as other processes hogging the cpu? and/or evo still busy doing something? On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 09:52, Denny Schierz wrote: hi, i upgraded from evo 1.2.3 to 1.4. It looks very nice with AA Fonts and GTK2 themes. But

Re: [Evolution] evolution taking 5+ minutes to shut down

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
- the CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 log as suggested by Ettore (run CAMEL_VERBISE_DEBUG=1 evolution-1.3 in a terminal) I will henceforth run evo this way. =:) I'll also log everything to a file so that if it does happen, hopefully something useful will show up. BTW if you upgrade to 1.4, the

Re: [Evolution] (no subject)

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
Hi, You shoudln't need to go to backups or anything. When mail is reconfigured this way, it does the following steps: - renames the existing folder from 'mbox' to 'mbox_config' (the name mbox is used for all folder types) - creates a new folder with the name 'mbox', of the new folder type -

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4.0 *very* slow

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
open a bug on bugzilla.ximian.com run evolution with CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 set in the environment and attach some of the output to the bug (there willprobably be a lot of it, a lot of HEAD commands, etc, just include the first few hundred lines of output). my guess is the server isn't

Re: [Evolution] Blinking cursor

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
could you open a bug on bugzilla.ximian.com, under the gtkhtml module. the cursor blink timeout should be reset when you move the cursor (as it does in the text entries), and it should also honour the global setting (if there is one) On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 12:05, Philippe wrote: Evol 1.4 / RH9.

Re: [Evolution] Duplicate Emails

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
It might be easier to submit a bug report about the hang, and get that fixed. Its not something i've had happen in years. run gdb on evolution-mail (or evolution if its 1.4), and ctrl-c it when it hangs, etc. On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 05:44, John Paul Walters wrote: Occasionally I find that

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4 Bugs/problems

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
Hi This isn't known afaik, hasn't been mentioned around here anywya. I suggest you open a bug for it, and attach a backtrace. On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 13:56, Scott Davis wrote: Hello.. I am having an issue with 1.4, and I am not sure if this bug is known or not. I tried searching for it, but

Re: [Evolution] Generating new email

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
Yes. It's simply that, from version 1.2 on, you have to drag the attachment to the HEADERS of the message you are composing. Dragging it to the body of the message will just write out a useless URL to the object. (file:///home/me/somefile.txt) I believe there's a bug about it

Re: [Evolution] Some issues with evolution

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
* I *need* to purge the attachments from my email. It's OK (and handy) for me to keep my attachments in my outgoing mail, but as far as incoming mail is concerned, it would be *madness*. I receive about 10Mb of attachment per day, as I work as an editor. I also like to back-up my home

Re: [Evolution] Re: Duplicate Emails

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
I've been telling people with this problem to press the Stop button in the toolbar (don't use the Cancel buttons in the SendReceive dialog, they don't work as well), it should force the operation to cancel. Just Huh? They all use the same mechanism to cancel. This makes no sense. make

Re: [Evolution] Printing w/ evo 1.4 on RH9 with XD2

2003-06-15 Thread Not Zed
You probably need to setup the printer in cups (system-administrator settings-add printer). On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 01:40, Lance A. Brown wrote: Greetings, After upgrading to Ximian Desktop 2 with evo 1.4 on my RH 9 box I can't print directly to my printer anymore. :-( The print button

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >