[Evolution] 2.10.0 GPG-signing badness (was Re: [Evolution-hackers] ANNOUNCE: Evolution 2.10.0...)

2007-03-14 Thread Saikat Guha
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 13:08 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > The Evolution Team is pleased to announce the release of > > * Evolution 2.10.0 Attempting to send GPG-signed mails freezes evolution. Mail is not sent. Evo needs to be killed. BZ: #418255 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/

Re: [Evolution] Word Wraping in Message Verticail Preview (Side-bySide)??

2006-12-05 Thread Saikat Guha
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 17:51 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > This is a FAQ and AFAIK you can't do it. The wrap boundary appears to be > > > hardwired at 70 characters, which apparently is inscribed in some > > > standard or other. > > > > If it's a FAQ, can someone please tell me which "sta

[Evolution] RFE: prefer-plain mail formatting plugin

2006-11-03 Thread Saikat Guha
There used to be a rather useful (reference) plugin that would let the default mail display prefer text/plain parts over text/html parts. Are there any plans to resurrect this plugin and support it? As someone willing to help out, what would be required to get it included in the default build?

[Evolution] Google import of Evolution iCal export

2006-04-16 Thread Saikat Guha
Hi, Google calendar (calendar.google.com) doesn't seem to like Evolution iCal files; I am trying to track down whether it is a problem with Google's import, or evolution's export. Looking at the differences between iCal files that Google is happy with, and the iCal file generated by Evolution 2.6

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-04-02 Thread Saikat Guha
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 02:27 +0200, guenther wrote: > > 2. I read the mail on home-Evo, which then marks it as read (both > > locally, and at the server) > > This may not necessarily be true. Evolution definitely syncs back with > the IMAP server, when you're leaving a folder. Yep, I tried switchi

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-30 Thread Saikat Guha
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 09:42 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 08:39, Saikat Guha wrote: > > The question then becomes, am I correct in concluding that Evolution > > cannot properly sync with up with IMAP without a three-finger salute? > > You can choos

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-30 Thread Saikat Guha
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 17:42 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 18:23 -0500, Saikat Guha wrote: > > I do not close > > evolution when I go home, or to the office and leave both running all > > day/all night. The problem I have is as follows: > > The obv

[Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-30 Thread Saikat Guha
Hi, I have one IMAP server, which is accessed by two different instances of Evolution on two separate computers (home and office). I do not close evolution when I go home, or to the office and leave both running all day/all night. The problem I have is as follows: 1. When a new mail arrives, both

[Evolution] Evolution memory leak on FC4 x86-64

2006-02-18 Thread Saikat Guha
I am running the version of evolution that comes with FC4 (so this problem may already have been fixed in CVS), but has anyone experienced huge memory leakage nearing 1.5GB on x86-64 SMP after about a day? Restarting evolution drops the mem usage to something reasonable. Here is the output of top: