Thanks. It seems to be working fine now.
poc
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 17:23 -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
Should I expect to see 'bogofilter' running as a demon (the way spamd
does)?
I know you fixed your problem, but just to confirm: there is no
bogofilter
(Replying to my own post)
It turns out I was wrong. Spam filtering is happening, it just took a
day or so to start doing anything. I had assumed that training
Bogofilter on a bunch of messages would make it effective immediately
but it didn't.
Sorry for the noise.
poc
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 10:38 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
(Replying to my own post)
It turns out I was wrong. Spam filtering is happening, it just took a
day or so to start doing anything. I had assumed that training
Bogofilter on a bunch of messages would make it effective immediately
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:11 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
Edit/Pugins - is bogofilter plugin checked?
I have installed bogofilter and its debuginfo. It does not appear in the
Edit/Plugins.(Spamassassin is there and active)
Edit/Preferences - pop account - Mail Preferences - Junk Tab - is
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:56 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
In case you're interested in more info re bogofilter.. the faq has some
quick info re training etc... ( note: per above, I believe you have to
have training on BOTH ham and spam before bogofilter will be able to
effectively mark mail
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:00 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:11 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
Edit/Pugins - is bogofilter plugin checked?
I have installed bogofilter and its debuginfo. It does not appear in the
Edit/Plugins.(Spamassassin is there and active)
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:00 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:11 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
Edit/Pugins - is bogofilter plugin checked?
I have installed bogofilter and its debuginfo. It does not appear in the
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:18 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
Or, I believe, you can create filters for incoming mail to have
bogofilter do spam checks
a quick google search should provide examples...
Sure, you can always do that. I even have procmail filtering. However,
that's not the
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:28 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:18 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
Or, I believe, you can create filters for incoming mail to have
bogofilter do spam checks
a quick google search should provide examples...
Sure, you can always
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:02 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
...
Bogofilter, in my experience. It's not even close. After training, my
spamassassin never got better than 90% catch rate, which is still some
hundred spams a day for me. Bogofilter is 99.9% at least, probably
better.
Andrew Montalenti wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:02 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
...
Bogofilter, in my experience. It's not even close. After training, my
spamassassin never got better than 90% catch rate, which is still some
hundred spams a day for me. Bogofilter is
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 11:08 -0400, Andrew Montalenti wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:02 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
...
Bogofilter, in my experience. It's not even close. After training, my
spamassassin never got better than 90% catch rate, which is still some
hundred
Michelle Murrain writes:
I don't have spamassassin installed - I'm simply using Evolution
(version 2.10.1 - Ubuntu Fiesty) as a pop client.
Are you saying that I'd have to set up spamassassin on my laptop to
filter the spam before it gets to evo? That certainly is a possible
solution,
Paul D. Smith wrote:
Michelle Murrain writes:
I don't have spamassassin installed - I'm simply using Evolution
(version 2.10.1 - Ubuntu Fiesty) as a pop client.
Are you saying that I'd have to set up spamassassin on my laptop to
filter the spam before it gets to evo? That
Hi all,
I've noticed that evolution basically doesn't filter spam on its own.
I've been diligently marking mail as junk, and asking evo to check for
junk, but it just doesn't.
1) Am I somehow missing something, or is there no baysean spam filter in
evolution at this point?
2) What solutions
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:34 +, Michelle Murrain wrote:
Hi all,
I've noticed that evolution basically doesn't filter spam on its own.
I've been diligently marking mail as junk, and asking evo to check for
junk, but it just doesn't.
1) Am I somehow missing something, or is there no
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:36 +0100, michael wrote:
I'm running Evolution 2.6.3 (recently upgraded). I originally thought
my
Evo (earlier version) wasn't filtering spam -- but it's just that it
took several 100 msgs to be marked as spam before spamassassin kicked
in.
To see what's happening,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:36 +0100, michael wrote:
I'm running Evolution 2.6.3 (recently upgraded). I originally thought my
Evo (earlier version) wasn't filtering spam -- but it's just that it
took several 100 msgs to be marked as spam before spamassassin kicked
in.
To see what's happening,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:36 +, Michelle Murrain wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:36 +0100, michael wrote:
I'm running Evolution 2.6.3 (recently upgraded). I originally thought my
Evo (earlier version) wasn't filtering spam -- but it's just that it
took several 100 msgs to be marked as
Edit/Pugins - is bogofilter plugin checked?
Edit/Preferences - pop account - Mail Preferences - Junk Tab - is
'check incoming mail for junk checked', is default junk plugin set to
bogofilter?
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:36 +, on behalf of Michelle Murrain wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:36
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:36 +, Michelle Murrain wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:36 +0100, michael wrote:
I'm running Evolution 2.6.3 (recently upgraded). I originally thought my
Evo (earlier version) wasn't filtering spam -- but it's just that it
took several 100 msgs to be marked as
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:22 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
You don't need to set it up, but you need to install it, since evo uses
spamassassin to filter spam. 2.12 will also have the option to use
bogofilter instead of spamassassin.
OK, I got it. Which is better? Bogofilter or
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:24 -0400, Michelle Murrain wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:22 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
You don't need to set it up, but you need to install it, since evo uses
spamassassin to filter spam. 2.12 will also have the option to use
bogofilter instead of
On 7/20/07, Michelle Murrain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that evolution basically doesn't filter spam on its own.
I've been diligently marking mail as junk, and asking evo to check for
junk, but it just doesn't.
I have been there. For some reason there is a user interface for
marking
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 18:37 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
Ok, but still, won't marking new messages as not-Junk also make SA do
the analysis?
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 19:27 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
Hans wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 18:37 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
Ok, but still, won't marking new messages as not-Junk also make SA do
the analysis?
I'm not 100% sure. But remember, filters err on the side of caution - if
it's
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 01:51 +0100, guenther wrote:
A hack-ish workaround to train Bayes using Evo is the following: Pick at
least 200 non-Junk messages, and keep them in mind. Now mark them as
Junk using the Evo UI. Go to your Junk folder, and mark all those
non-Junk mail we just abused in a
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 19:27 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
Ok, but still, won't marking new messages as not-Junk also make SA do
the analysis?
I'm not 100% sure. But remember, filters err on the side of caution - if
it's not sure it won't flag it as junk. Hence telling it something isn't
Hello,
I have been facing a problem with Spam Assassin and Evolution integration.
My Evolution runs 24/7 on my computer and from time to time I have to restart it due to high memory consumption. I have noticed that the evolution task usually takes about 950 MiB after some time running (2
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 16:10 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 15:02 -0600, Gregg Fowler wrote:
I just started using Evolution with Ubuntu last Saturday. While I am
really happy with the program, I don't believe the Spam Filter is
working correctly. At first I realized that the
A hack-ish workaround to train Bayes using Evo is the following: Pick at
least 200 non-Junk messages, and keep them in mind. Now mark them as
Junk using the Evo UI. Go to your Junk folder, and mark all those
non-Junk mail we just abused in a sacrificial manner and correctly mark
them as
Hans wrote:
A hack-ish workaround to train Bayes using Evo is the following: Pick at
least 200 non-Junk messages, and keep them in mind. Now mark them as
Junk using the Evo UI. Go to your Junk folder, and mark all those
non-Junk mail we just abused in a sacrificial manner and correctly mark
them
I just started using Evolution with Ubuntu last Saturday. While I am
really happy with the program, I don't believe the Spam Filter is
working correctly. At first I realized that the Spam Assasin package was
required and I installed it. The filter still doesn't seem to catch
much. If anyone could
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 15:02 -0600, Gregg Fowler wrote:
I just started using Evolution with Ubuntu last Saturday. While I am
really happy with the program, I don't believe the Spam Filter is
working correctly. At first I realized that the Spam Assasin package was
required and I installed it.
Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 15:02 -0600, Gregg Fowler wrote:
I just started using Evolution with Ubuntu last Saturday. While I am
really happy with the program, I don't believe the Spam Filter is
working correctly. At first I realized that the Spam Assasin package was
required and
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:32 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 15:02 -0600, Gregg Fowler wrote:
I just started using Evolution with Ubuntu last Saturday. While I am
really happy with the program, I don't believe the Spam Filter is
working correctly. At
36 matches
Mail list logo
