On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 00:49 +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote:
You don't happen to be using a 'Sender or Recipients' condition in your
problematic vfolders, do you?
Nope. They are just aggretation folders so that I don't have to poll
a few dozen rss feeds/mailboxes/newsgroups for new items.
b.
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 08:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 21:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Your BZ report talks about issues with large newsgroups.
Indeed.
Are you seeing
the same with large mail folders?
I don't have any/enough mail folders that
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 08:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
... as I have said, startup times after a crash (which is still too
frequent an occurrence unfortunately) is on the order of close to 10
minutes if not more and when I strace it, it's all reads/writes to the
sqlite db(s).
You don't
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 21:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Your BZ report talks about issues with large newsgroups.
Indeed.
Are you seeing
the same with large mail folders?
I don't have any/enough mail folders that compete with the quantity/size
of newsgroups.
I have one IMAP folder
Peter and Brian: I think you should reserve your angry complaints to
your resellers, if any.
Brian: Your bug report 582945, is one that requires quite a bit of
work just to reproduce and the very nature of the bug might prevent it
from getting a very high priority. You say it only affects users
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 15:03 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
Peter and Brian: I think you should reserve your angry complaints to
your resellers, if any.
Huh?
Brian: Your bug report 582945, is one that requires quite a bit of
work just to reproduce
Not at all. Simply subscribe to a bunch
2009/8/24 Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca:
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 15:03 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
[snip] ...aggregates all of my newsgroups says there are 418389 messages in
it
with 418344 unread (i.e. only 5 unread messages -- yeah right). However
I know the difference bet...
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 18:01 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
If there are 418389 messages in total, of which 418344 are unread, then
that means you've read 45 of them, doesn't it?
LOL. Yeah, that's what the counts are saying. As I have maintained,
they are way wrong, have been since the
2009/8/23 Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca:
I'm just wondering if the folder scalability issues will be resolved for
the next major release (2.6.28)?
I would not hold my breath -- it has been like this for the several
years that I struggled trying to use it. Access to an Exchange mailbox
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 12:03 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I'm just wondering if the folder scalability issues will be resolved for
the next major release (2.6.28)?
For reference, I filed bug 589245 in bugzilla back on July 21 and the
only response was a recommendation to use the patch in
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 13:10 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
2009/8/23 Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca:
I'm just wondering if the folder scalability issues will be resolved for
the next major release (2.6.28)?
I would not hold my breath -- it has been like this for the several
years
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Patrick O'Callaghanp...@usb.ve wrote:
I don't use Exchange so I don't really have anything useful to say, but
just as a general comment, large means different things to different
people so you might want to be more specific.
1 - 2 GB during the time I was
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 21:38 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
I don't use Exchange so I don't really have anything useful to say,
but
just as a general comment, large means different things to
different
people so you might want to be more specific.
1 - 2 GB during the time I was struggling
13 matches
Mail list logo
