Re: [Evolution] Recovering cached mail
Mbox files are defined as rfc822 mail messages split by a blank line and a line starting with From_, which is F, r, o, m and a space. It's possible some of the lines in your mbox file don't follow this convention, and maybe that's why Evolution is having a hard time parsing it. For example, I know many times messages have a From:_ line, rather than a From_ line. The colon matters. So you may have to do some manual replacements, e.g. in vim you can do :%s/^From: /From /g. I hope that helps. From some quick googling there are some scripts that do guesses like this on the web. You can look for Maildir to mbox conversion. Andrew On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 14:44 +1100, James McCaw wrote: That is the first thing I tried, except I didn't have the spaces between the concatenated files...I'll give it a shot... Unfortunately it doesn't seem to work. The file command claims my concatenated file is indeed RFC 822 mail text, but when dumped into ~/.evolution/mail/local it doesn't show up in evolution (a directory appears but it doesn't have any emails in it). file run on files in ~/.evolution/mail/local indicates that they are ISO-8859 mail text, with very long lines so the question is now: How does one (easily!) convert an RFC 822 file to the appropriate evolution local directory format? Thanks for your input Andrew. Cheers James On 09/02/07, Andrew Montalenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If those really are rfc822 mail files, you could probably just concatenate them together (which would produce an mbox file) and copy the mbox file to ~/.evolution/mail/local/. Something like: cd ~/.evolution/mail/exchange/acct/personal/sub/folders/Saved\ Items/ cat * cache-mbox mv cache-mbox ~/.evolution/mail/local/ It's possible that the rfc822 files do not end with a blank line. If that's so, the above may not work (mbox files are rfc822 messages separated by blank lines). When the cache-mbox file is in the evolution local mail directory, restarting evolution should get it to show up in your folder list. HTH, I am not an evolution expert (just user), Andrew On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 18:40 +1100, James McCaw wrote: Hi evolution mailing list Today I accidently deleted some mail (only about 30 messages) from an exchange server account. I discovered I have a locally cached copy in the directory ~/.evolution/mail/exchange/account name/personal/sub folders/Saved Items/ In that directory there are two binary files cmeta and summary and a directory cache (with subdirs full of the RFC 822 mail files). I can confirm that the 30 missing messages are there by examing the files in cache one by one. Unfortunately I can't find a way to recover those files or import them back into evolution. The File-Import dialog doesn't allow me to import those files. Any tips? Thanks in advance for any replies. Cheers James ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] sort by date and group by threads
Hello list, I sort my INBOX by date and group messages by thread. A new message which is not part of a thread gets placed as expected at the bottom of the message list. However, a new message which is part of a thread gets placed into the thread, and the thread does not move to the bottom of the message list. The whole thread is placed into the message list according to its first message and not its most recent one. Is there any way to change this? Thanks already, nick ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 07:32 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote: Hello list, I sort my INBOX by date and group messages by thread. A new message which is not part of a thread gets placed as expected at the bottom of the message list. However, a new message which is part of a thread gets placed into the thread, and the thread does not move to the bottom of the message list. The whole thread is placed into the message list according to its first message and not its most recent one. Is there any way to change this? Oh God, yes please. b. -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Evolution Calendar and DST 2007
Sorry if this is obtuse or has been covered before I joined, but we are rolling out Evolution on our new lab systems (Linux/PC dual-boot). I am wondering if it has any issues with (or patch for) the new DST rules or if it solely uses the system time, unlike Outlook: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA102086071033.aspx Thanks, -Matt Matthew Kozak Rutgers University-Camden ** They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Ben Franklin ** ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Search boxes and UI meddling
Hi, I've been an Evolution user for a long time. The main reason I use Evolution is for its search/indexing features, since I have huge mail boxes and like to be able to search through them quickly. In recent versions of Evolution (I guess beyond 2.7, I'm using 2.8.1) the Search Box at the top of the message view was redesigned. I think this redesign was actually a step backward, and would like to know if other people have raised this concern. Aside from the silliness that the box is just too small, I don't understand why it seems to make sense to have a click on the tiny icon of a magnifying glass change in what part of a message you are searching, and to click a paint brush to clear the message (you may tell me that's a broom, but at that size, it's a paint brush). When I am searching within a message, I don't even know I am because the gray text for Message contains only appears when my search query is empty. Considering these searches are sticky to the folder I'm in, I may very well return back to a folder I previously searched for dinner and not know whether I search the subject/sender or the message itself, unless I click that silly magnifying glass again. I also don't get why the Show pull down exists. I think it would make more sense if that Show pull down showed _your_ saved searches, rather than some hard coded ones some other developer thought I'd find useful. I don't even use labels (and why should I, Evolution doesn't even let me customize them), but even so in the Show menu I have not one but six options related to labels. Likewise, I don't use Evolution's built-in Junk mail filtering (I use spam assassin externally since for some reason it's much faster that way), and have another wasted option there for Messages Not Junk. Less than half the options are therefore even usable by me, but I can't get rid of them and what's even more frustrating is that any of them could be emulated by a Saved Search, which _don't_ show up there. Does anyone else agree with me as to the silliness of these UI redesigns? I hate to be a whiner and if I had more than a few moments I'd scratch the itches myself, but I really would like to know what inspired these steps backward, and see if there is any agreement about undoing them. Andrew ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Search boxes and UI meddling
Totally agree. I'm nervous every time I search. Should I use the Search menu, or the Search box? Do they do the same thing or not? What about Advanced Search? Is it going to make me give a name to save the search or can I use it just once? etc. etc. The whole thing needs to be rethought IMHO. BTW, I didn't even realize the little magnifying glass was clickable! Its location makes it functionally invisible and it lacks what the CHI people call affordance. poc On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:54 -0500, Andrew Montalenti wrote: Hi, I've been an Evolution user for a long time. The main reason I use Evolution is for its search/indexing features, since I have huge mail boxes and like to be able to search through them quickly. In recent versions of Evolution (I guess beyond 2.7, I'm using 2.8.1) the Search Box at the top of the message view was redesigned. I think this redesign was actually a step backward, and would like to know if other people have raised this concern. Aside from the silliness that the box is just too small, I don't understand why it seems to make sense to have a click on the tiny icon of a magnifying glass change in what part of a message you are searching, and to click a paint brush to clear the message (you may tell me that's a broom, but at that size, it's a paint brush). When I am searching within a message, I don't even know I am because the gray text for Message contains only appears when my search query is empty. Considering these searches are sticky to the folder I'm in, I may very well return back to a folder I previously searched for dinner and not know whether I search the subject/sender or the message itself, unless I click that silly magnifying glass again. I also don't get why the Show pull down exists. I think it would make more sense if that Show pull down showed _your_ saved searches, rather than some hard coded ones some other developer thought I'd find useful. I don't even use labels (and why should I, Evolution doesn't even let me customize them), but even so in the Show menu I have not one but six options related to labels. Likewise, I don't use Evolution's built-in Junk mail filtering (I use spam assassin externally since for some reason it's much faster that way), and have another wasted option there for Messages Not Junk. Less than half the options are therefore even usable by me, but I can't get rid of them and what's even more frustrating is that any of them could be emulated by a Saved Search, which _don't_ show up there. Does anyone else agree with me as to the silliness of these UI redesigns? I hate to be a whiner and if I had more than a few moments I'd scratch the itches myself, but I really would like to know what inspired these steps backward, and see if there is any agreement about undoing them. Andrew ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution Calendar and DST 2007
Heya, On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:54 -0500, Matt Kozak wrote: Sorry if this is obtuse or has been covered before I joined, but we are rolling out Evolution on our new lab systems (Linux/PC dual-boot). I am wondering if it has any issues with (or patch for) the new DST rules or if it solely uses the system time, unlike Outlook: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA102086071033.aspx This is managed by OS tzdata/glibc packages and not evolution , afaik. -- Ritesh Khadgaray ॐ मणि पद्मे हूँ LinuX N Stuff Ph: +919822394463 Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution Calendar and DST 2007
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 22:28 +0530, Ritesh Khadgaray wrote: Heya, On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:54 -0500, Matt Kozak wrote: Sorry if this is obtuse or has been covered before I joined, but we are rolling out Evolution on our new lab systems (Linux/PC dual-boot). I am wondering if it has any issues with (or patch for) the new DST rules or if it solely uses the system time, unlike Outlook: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA102086071033.aspx This is managed by OS tzdata/glibc packages and not evolution , afaik. A question comes to mind: does it mean some appointments in the past will change local time ? Xav ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution Calendar and DST 2007
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 22:28 +0530, Ritesh Khadgaray wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:54 -0500, Matt Kozak wrote: Sorry if this is obtuse or has been covered before I joined, but we are rolling out Evolution on our new lab systems (Linux/PC dual-boot). I am wondering if it has any issues with (or patch for) the new DST rules or if it solely uses the system time, unlike Outlook: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA102086071033.aspx This is managed by OS tzdata/glibc packages and not evolution , afaik. Unfortunately, libical (an unmaintained third-party library that's distributed with Evolution-Data-Server) does use it's own timezone information. See: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301363 Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Small Icons / Icons Only
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 15:31 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 11:39 -0700, Aaron Segura wrote: I've tried searching the list archives and documentation, but can't find out how to do what I want. Using Evolution 2.6.1, is there a way to change the toolbar icons so they are smaller and don't contain text? Like when you right-click on the Firefox toolbar, click customize, then are able to select Use small Icons and Show: Icons? Yes, but this is a desktop-wide setting. It will affect all your applications. (This is why the HIG suggests this setting be over-ridable in individual applications, but I guess Evo isn't there yet...) Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]GNOME Desktop Group http://ie.sun.com +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Search boxes and UI meddling
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 12:45 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: BTW, I didn't even realize the little magnifying glass was clickable! Its location makes it functionally invisible and it lacks what the CHI people call affordance. FWIW, I filed a bug a few months ago to have a downward arrow added to the icon, to make it more obvious that it offered some menu items (aka make it look more like Spotlight search on the Mac). I'd agree there's certainly scope for grander improvements, though. Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]GNOME Desktop Group http://ie.sun.com +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads
In 2.8.x onwards, if the thread is collapsed, the date of the thread is considered to be the date of the most recent message in the thread. But if it is expanded, it doesnt follow this. You can collapse all threads (View-Collapse All Threads) may be once in a while to know, if any new messages popped to the old threads. -Srini On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 07:32 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote: Hello list, I sort my INBOX by date and group messages by thread. A new message which is not part of a thread gets placed as expected at the bottom of the message list. However, a new message which is part of a thread gets placed into the thread, and the thread does not move to the bottom of the message list. The whole thread is placed into the message list according to its first message and not its most recent one. Is there any way to change this? Thanks already, nick ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Search boxes and UI meddling
Hi, On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 12:45 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Totally agree. I'm nervous every time I search. Should I use the Search menu, or the Search box? Do they do the same thing or not? What about Advanced Search? Is it going to make me give a name to save the search or can I use it just once? etc. etc. Even more interesting is that I'm experiencing a bug since I upgraded. If I do use a saved search from Search - 1. My Saved Search, it doesn't actually get applied unless I go into the search box, press enter so that the Advanced Search dialog comes up with my saved search, and then press OK. How annoying. Will file a bug about this when I get a moment, don't know if it has to do with some stale state in my .evolution folder. The whole thing needs to be rethought IMHO. I think the whole thing needs to be REALLY rethought. Evo's mailer has some real design innovations, but at the core of an e-mail application is search. E-mail applications need to have two main use cases in mind: 1. Receiving and reading NEW mail (which Evo does decently well, but still not optimally) 2. Searching OLD mail (which Evo used to do exceptionally well, but now does abysmally) I want a mailer with great search capabilities, so I can track down that JetBlue receipt for a flight I booked three months ago, or find an e-mail my friend sent me 6 months ago but that I never got around to replying to. I would also really push for some standard query language capabilities in Evo. I'd like to be able to type unread messages containing 'Andrew' in a search box (with shortcuts, like unread contain 'Andrew'), rather than having to create a search called Unread, creating the message is unread condition, and then filtering those based on message contains 'Andrew'. Sometimes, a GUI isn't the most usable UI. Evo also needs to get more keyboard friendly. What happened to our UNIX roots? BTW, I didn't even realize the little magnifying glass was clickable! Its location makes it functionally invisible and it lacks what the CHI people call affordance. Evo gets affordance better than most other applications for most things. But this search box redesign definitely ruins affordance, as you say. I know Evo's designers/hackers don't like to see themselves in competition with Gmail, but... we really need to start looking at what works. Andrew On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:54 -0500, Andrew Montalenti wrote: Hi, I've been an Evolution user for a long time. The main reason I use Evolution is for its search/indexing features, since I have huge mail boxes and like to be able to search through them quickly. In recent versions of Evolution (I guess beyond 2.7, I'm using 2.8.1) the Search Box at the top of the message view was redesigned. I think this redesign was actually a step backward, and would like to know if other people have raised this concern. Aside from the silliness that the box is just too small, I don't understand why it seems to make sense to have a click on the tiny icon of a magnifying glass change in what part of a message you are searching, and to click a paint brush to clear the message (you may tell me that's a broom, but at that size, it's a paint brush). When I am searching within a message, I don't even know I am because the gray text for Message contains only appears when my search query is empty. Considering these searches are sticky to the folder I'm in, I may very well return back to a folder I previously searched for dinner and not know whether I search the subject/sender or the message itself, unless I click that silly magnifying glass again. I also don't get why the Show pull down exists. I think it would make more sense if that Show pull down showed _your_ saved searches, rather than some hard coded ones some other developer thought I'd find useful. I don't even use labels (and why should I, Evolution doesn't even let me customize them), but even so in the Show menu I have not one but six options related to labels. Likewise, I don't use Evolution's built-in Junk mail filtering (I use spam assassin externally since for some reason it's much faster that way), and have another wasted option there for Messages Not Junk. Less than half the options are therefore even usable by me, but I can't get rid of them and what's even more frustrating is that any of them could be emulated by a Saved Search, which _don't_ show up there. Does anyone else agree with me as to the silliness of these UI redesigns? I hate to be a whiner and if I had more than a few moments I'd scratch the itches myself, but I really would like to know what inspired these steps backward, and see if there is any agreement about undoing them. Andrew ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Search boxes and UI meddling
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 17:17 +, Calum Benson wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 12:45 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: BTW, I didn't even realize the little magnifying glass was clickable! Its location makes it functionally invisible and it lacks what the CHI people call affordance. FWIW, I filed a bug a few months ago to have a downward arrow added to the icon, to make it more obvious that it offered some menu items (aka make it look more like Spotlight search on the Mac). I'd agree there's certainly scope for grander improvements, though. IMHO, the very idea of having a clickable icon *inside* a text entry box makes me squirm. It's just wrong wrong wrong. An icon in a text box looks like a label or type indicator, not something operational. poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Search boxes and UI meddling
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 13:50 -0500, Andrew Montalenti wrote: I know Evo's designers/hackers don't like to see themselves in competition with Gmail, but... we really need to start looking at what works. Thunderbird is closer to Evo in philosophy than Gmail is, and many of its interface decisions seem better thought out than Evo's. Its Junk controls also work a lot better, but that's another topic. poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads
I would prefer if it would also sort the uncollapsed threads as well though. Do you know whether this is going to be implemented at some point? Should I open a bug report? nick On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 23:40 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: In 2.8.x onwards, if the thread is collapsed, the date of the thread is considered to be the date of the most recent message in the thread. But if it is expanded, it doesnt follow this. You can collapse all threads (View-Collapse All Threads) may be once in a while to know, if any new messages popped to the old threads. -Srini On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 07:32 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote: Hello list, I sort my INBOX by date and group messages by thread. A new message which is not part of a thread gets placed as expected at the bottom of the message list. However, a new message which is part of a thread gets placed into the thread, and the thread does not move to the bottom of the message list. The whole thread is placed into the message list according to its first message and not its most recent one. Is there any way to change this? Thanks already, nick ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 12:10 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote: I would prefer if it would also sort the uncollapsed threads as well though. Do you know whether this is going to be implemented at some point? Should I open a bug report? nick I second this... ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Search boxes and UI meddling
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 15:01 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: IMHO, the very idea of having a clickable icon *inside* a text entry box makes me squirm. It's just wrong wrong wrong. An icon in a text box looks like a label or type indicator, not something operational. Lucky for us, we have not one but _two_ operational icons in the same text box :-) Andrew ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] sort by date and group by threads
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 14:15 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: And I third it and I am sure there are forty-eleven people behind me. But seriously, the hard work has been done if a collapsed thread will sort by the newest message in it surely. It sounds like the treatment of expanded threads is more policy and not technology. b. -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution Calendar and DST 2007
Hmmm. Is this on anyone's radar or is there any talk of doing something about it in Evolution if the libical group is still wrestling with it (I see a lot of confusion on that bug link, but no committed resoolution, but maybe it's just late on a Friday...)? Thanks, -Matt On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 22:28 +0530, Ritesh Khadgaray wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:54 -0500, Matt Kozak wrote: Sorry if this is obtuse or has been covered before I joined, but we are rolling out Evolution on our new lab systems (Linux/PC dual-boot). I am wondering if it has any issues with (or patch for) the new DST rules or if it solely uses the system time, unlike Outlook: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA102086071033.aspx This is managed by OS tzdata/glibc packages and not evolution , afaik. Unfortunately, libical (an unmaintained third-party library that's distributed with Evolution-Data-Server) does use it's own timezone information. See: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301363 Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list Matthew Kozak Rutgers University-Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Ben Franklin ** ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] 2.8.x does not save appointments on Exchange server
Hi, I'm wondering if I'm the only one having this problem. When I create an appointment on an Exchange Calendar through Evolution, it appears locally in the Evolution calendar view until I quit Evolution. Then it's gone. At no time is it ever actually published on the Exchange server, and I missed a few appointments after upgrading to 2.8.x until I discovered that this was happening. There are two bugs open for this issue that I know of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225372 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394473 The bug in bugzilla.gnome.org has been open for a month without any action, and I'm wondering if this just isn't affecting anyone else? Here's what Evolution spits out in the terminal I run it from when I make an appointment on the exchange calendar: (evolution:27791): libecal-WARNING **: e-cal.c:321: Unexpected response (evolution:27791): libecal-WARNING **: e-cal.c:321: Unexpected response (evolution:27791): calendar-gui-CRITICAL **: e_day_view_add_event: assertion `end add_event_data-day_view-lower' failed (evolution:27791): calendar-gui-CRITICAL **: e_week_view_add_event: assertion `end add_event_data-week_view-day_starts[0]' failed Any help is appreciated. I'd like to stay on the 2.8.x release, but having to use a browser and OWA every time I want to manipulate my Exchange calendar is really a pain. Thanks, Per ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Evolution sometimes hides my emails
For some reason, every now and again evolution (2.2.1) clears out my inbox, presenting me with a blank space, where there should be lots of messages. They have not been actually deleted (if I use MS web exchange, I'll get them); it's just that evolution, for some reason, won't display them. It does, however, display all messages received since hiding the others. How do I get the others back? They are there on the server, but for some reason I can't access them. Sometimes I can simply quit and restart evolution, and there they all are again; other times if I quit evolution I can't restart it (as I have mentioned in previous postings). I have a nasty idea that it is in fact a problem with glib/gtk2, and not with evolution itself, but I don't know how to verify this, or to fix it. Thanks, Alasdair ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
