On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 11:07 +1100, Nick Jenkins wrote:
latest roadmap (http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.26) concerns the
planning for 2.26. That version was released more than 6 months
ago,
There's also:
http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28 and
http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.30
So here is my challenge to the evolution development team:
I am sure the team is fully challenged already. You are directing your
challenge at the wrong address. It would make more sense to challenge
the team's employers (various Linux distros). It's they who decide
what the team works on.
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:24 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 12:22 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
So here is my challenge to the evolution development team:
I am sure the team is fully challenged already. You are directing your
challenge at the wrong address. It would
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 12:22 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I am sure the team is fully challenged already.
I am sure they are. I just think their challenges are mis-focused for
the time being, on features and not fixing the plethora of bugs out
there.
You are directing your
challenge at the
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:13 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Maybe nobody else experiences this?
I experience hangs (i.e. freezes) all of the time. I send in stack
traces every time I do. They just don't lead to anything.
I've not ever had Evolution
hard-freeze that I can recall.
How
I've not ever had Evolution
hard-freeze that I can recall.
How much of evolution do you use though? Single POP account or
something.
All day, every day, connected to multiple IMAP servers.
Probably those of us experiencing such frequent deadlocks
are using many of evolutions features.
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:37 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:13 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Maybe nobody else experiences this?
I experience hangs (i.e. freezes) all of the time. I send in stack
traces every time I do. They just don't lead to anything.
address books including LDAP
Yep.
Recently I had Evo freeze on me quite often - until I removed an LDAP
address book and since then, not a single lockup. The freezes were when
displaying mail and it turns out that the load images from people in
address book (or whatever) was causing
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:13 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:24 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 12:22 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
So here is my challenge to the evolution development team:
I am sure the team is fully challenged already.
address books including LDAP
Yep
Recently I had Evo freeze on me quite often - until I removed an LDAP
address book and since then, not a single lockup. The freezes were when
displaying mail and it turns out that the load images from people in
address book (or whatever) was causing
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:18 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
Recently I had Evo freeze on me quite often - until I removed an LDAP
address book and since then, not a single lockup. The freezes were when
displaying mail and it turns out that the load images from people in
address book (or whatever)
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 15:05 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Just for the sake of completeness, did you try with the default GTK+
theme ?
I am far from an expert in these areas, but I fail to see how a GTK+
theme has any relevance on Evolution hanging and deadlocking on non-gui
issues.
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 10:02 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
In the case of free software the contribution may be money, or code,
or documentation, or simply reporting bugs.
Or effort to test patches, or supply more information to help those with
code knowledge, which I am willing to do,
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 10:02 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I'd prefer they write and debug code.
False dichotomy. It's one or the other.
Oops. I meant to say It's *not* one or the other.
poc
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
And Evolution remains, as it has been for many years, THE premiere Open
Source mail client and PIM. There is nothing else that comes close to
the functionality and stability provided by Evolution. The closest is
probably Thunderbird [known around the office as
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:24 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
It would be nice to hear someone on the devel team say what the worst
bugs are thought to be and explain what they propose to do about them.
Unfortunately the various roadmaps, version by version, say nothing
about prioritizing
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:56 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:24 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
It would be nice to hear someone on the devel team say what the
worst
bugs are thought to be and explain what they propose to do about
them.
Unfortunately the various
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:56 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
This is a long-term vision. We'll continue fixing the symptoms that
users report, but we also need to treat the disease that's at the
heart of these bugs if Evolution is ever going to turn its reputation
around.
Thanks for your input
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:56 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
I would say that we are struggling in terms of manpower.
Yes, that's sad, but a reality of our current economic (and probably
other) situation(s).
Certainly in answer to such a problem I am not advocating that the
people left work more
latest roadmap (http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.26) concerns the
planning for 2.26. That version was released more than 6 months ago,
There's also:
http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28 and
http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.30 (although maybe there weren't
previously links to those pages on
I have filed I don't know how many bugs this weekend. Probably some are
duplicates, but when you have to wade through 79 bugs matching a
function in a frame in a stacktrace, it's just plain out of control.
I am so frustrated with the many crashes of evolution I get a day and
that every time I do
21 matches
Mail list logo
