Bill,
When UserB sends a meeting request on behalf of UserC and the recipient
replies, does UserA recieves the reply, does UserB or do they both get it?
Does UserB get all mail sent to UserC?
If UserB is the only one to get recipient replies to meeting requests and
they get other mail sent to
Thanks Paul...
The weird thing is that I was not sending the e-mail from my mail client...I
was sending a new mail, directly from the Swynk Exchange List web page. If
something is being attached to the e-mail, it must be the web interface
doing it, because I just copied and pasted a flat text
Folks,
I have a slight SPAM problem I would like some help with if possible, so put
on your thinking caps. I have read several RFC's and Technet articles about
how things are supposed to work, but none of them seem to cover interpreting
the sequence of events. Also, several things just don't
...darn list bot must be female. ;0P
Any help would be appreciated.
JB
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Internet Mail Header Investigation
Folks,
I have a slight SPAM
Sounds like you forgot to give your account admin privileges in the Exchange
Admin console.
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange server move to new machine
I had to move
through...
Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Header Investigation
Ok...this is starting to hack me off. It's not my e
,
Serialize complete at 2001-11-29 11:02:11 AM
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary===IFJRGLKFGIR46408UHRUHIHD
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
at 2001-11-29 11:02:11 AM
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Exchange
: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
--_=_NextPart_000_01C1780F.8D84D950--
--==IFJRGLKFGIR46408UHRUHIHD--
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Internet Mail Header
There you have it...that's the header file. You actually want to start
reading the header file from the bottom of this post up...
TIA for the help.
JB
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Exchange
-
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Header Investigation
There you have it...that's the header file. You actually want to start
reading the header file from the bottom
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
For what it's worth, after reading article:
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7695, the IMS
version I am using is 5.5.2653.13.
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:37 AM
To: Exchange
correctly. This is similiar to how mine is set except I
have null for my Host and Clients... This prevents any relaying (or is
suppose to).
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
to the
same domain. One recommendation is to setup a custom Email Domain on the
Intenet Mail connector tab. Set your mime type to Ascii. This is for
another error I remember seeing in your original post.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Trend Information:
http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_GONE.A;
VSect=T
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak
Any links to any
Symantec/Norton AV Information:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak
Trend Information:
http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo
We have been blocking .scr's for a LONG time, but we have seen 5 of these
blocked already this morning.
Jim Blunt
Network / Exchange Admin
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Roger,
A site that I found very helpful today in the identification of SPAM sites
and their responsible owners is:
www.samspade.org
Jim Blunt
Network / Exchange Admin
Network Infrastructure Group
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
My tracking logs are located at:
\\servername\c$\exchsrvr\tracking.log\20011205.log
Settings for adding to the tracking logs would be: Go to the properties of
your IMS, Information Store Site Configuration or MTA Site Configuration.
On the General tab of the IS or MTA config or the Internet Mail
Just curious,
What's wrong with a free product? We have a P100 / 128 mb RAM machine,
running RH Linux 7.0 with Qmail/Qmail Scan behind our firewall and between
our boundary and our IMS. It scans for both attachment types and subject
lines. We have not had a SINGLE infection since before
Just got through installing it...was a snap, everything works great.
James H (Jim) Blunt
Network / Microsoft Exchange Admin.
Network Infrastructure Group
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
509-372-9188
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001
Eric,
This sounds more like a client configuration issue (Outlook), rather than a
server issue, based on your statement Users trying to move large emails or
lots of emails get a cant move access denied errors. Several of my users,
when trying to move large volumes of mail from their mailbox to
Go to the Options... portion of your message and set the Have replies
sent to: box to the mail address of the PF.
Jim Blunt
Network / E-mail Admin
Network / Infrastructure Group
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
509-372-9188
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL
with Sending as Public Folder
Sounds like a good idea, although I've never had to do that before. It
didn't work though... my address still shows up in the return-path.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Exchange
Folder
I'm the Owner. I also have service account privileges.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
Don't know if it would make
to send
as a PF if your address is going to show up in the mail header.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP issue with Sending as Public Folder
On the Properties
Tom,
Actually (correct me if I'm wrong and I'm sure someone on this list will),
when the definitions are updated, it only rescans the attachments within the
store, not the entire store. Therefore, if you are like Seielstad or
Blackstone and block ALL attachments, g it should only take a couple
Andy,
Very professional disclaimer, but shouldn't there be a mention of the actual
phone or fax number to call? ;o)
If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify
Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone, fax, or email and delete
the message.
-Original
What is that crud in your sig?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange CALs
How exactly does the Exchange 2000 CALs work? If all my clients will be
using Outlook, will I need
Actually, I have an AOL account...I know, I know...but I've had it since
before I became a network admin and all my friends know the address...
Mailbox limit for AOL is 16 mb
Single-Instance inbound e-mail limit is 3.5 mb
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Don,
I have this problem occasionally as well...even sending to domains like
microsoft.com, yahoo.com, etc. After doing an nslookup on the domain and
then contacting our ISP, it usually tends to be a slow or faulty link
somewhere in the Sprint backbone between here and California.
Jim Blunt
If this is a nested DL, then the mailbox/Public Folder that is sending to
this DL must have permissions to send to all the sub-DL's as well.
For example: Say you have 5 companies that subcontract to your company.
You want to allow certain organizations within your company (i.e., HR,
Benefits,
Gosh...that was a STUPID answer...wish I could take that one back. I was
going more off of Martin's reply, than the actual NDR...my bad.
What version of Exchange are you running? Try the following Q articles,
based on version:
XADM: NDR When Sending to Recipient From Offline Address Book
Eric,
We are using the same AV you are and we are approximately the same size you
are. We got the Symantec Corporate 7.6 upgrade about a week ago. Side
Note: With XP/NAV 7.6 installed on a workstation, you will have to turn off
your AV software before trying to burn a CD.
As Ed Crowley (ONE
! a full time job?
Can I quote you on some of this? I'm always looking for ammo when it comes
to changing my group to a more aggressive style.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Gentlemen Ladies:
Setup: One IMS, One Bridgehead, Three mailbox servers, One OWA Server. All
servers are Windows 2000 Sp2. IMS, mailbox servers and bridgehead are
Exchange 5.5 SP4+3, OWA is Exchange 5.5 SP4+2.
Problem: I think I have my first major problem with the Event Store. Got
the
Sorry...forgot to change the subject before sending last time...my
apologies.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim)
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:55 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet
Gentlemen Ladies:
Setup: One IMS, One Bridgehead, Three
H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Problems???
Sorry...forgot to change the subject before sending last time...my
apologies.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim)
Sent: Thursday
Subject: RE: Information Store Problems???
I would still run ISINTEG and see if it finds any problems. Don't have it
do any fixes, just run it and see what the IS looks like.
D
BSD Skunks the Penguin - Roger Seielstad
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL
Have you applied any of the post-SP4 hotfixes?
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deleting Empty ABV's
I have tried logging on as the service account but that didnt work
An old year going
One we will never forget
Hope youngsters learn well
Much tragedy, much good
Some have experienced pain
Some became heroes
Don't think bad people
will overcome the good ones
Good wins in the end
Bin Laden look out
We're going to find you soon
We won't have mercy
To all our
= good?
Unprecedented
World co-operation
From this tragedy.
We thank the nations
By withdrawing from thirty
Year old bomb treaty.
Yes sir, Mr Blunt,
Should the 'good' win in the end
I hope it's still us.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim)
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 12/28
Tom...I agree with you. Same setup, no problems. In fact, we usually know
about and have .dat file updates in place, before the people across the
street even find out about possible problems...they're running TrendMicro
Scanmail.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL
wartally fixed should be
dexposed prepatically.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
I don't know William...
Sounds like you're unsatisfied
Living here with us
Go Huskies!!
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o)
D
[1] Or so I hope they do...[2]
[2] Dr. Dogg, where
Ron,
My guess would be that some of your users are using .pst files to store
their mail they need archived. If so, then they must have gotten that virus
prior to you implementing a good virus scanning policy. Our users still run
into an occasional Marker infected attachment, along with a
www.samspade.org
Scroll down the page till you see the field with the Blackhole button next
to it. Input the IP address of your server and click the button. It will
check about 18 different blackhole listings for your address, without adding
you to any lists.
-Original Message-
From:
MAILBOX may not be running Exchange or even be running, but have you tried
pinging the IP address that was associated with that server? If it pings,
then you may have your DNS set to resolve that IP to that NetBIOS name. If
true, E2K may think that Exchange server is still up and running? I
I'm having the same problem both of you are. I'm running WinXP SP2,
upgraded from W2k, with OfficeXP, upgraded from O2k...I'm sure it's a
feature of the upgrade process.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:12 AM
To:
Ok, here's the situation: Win2k SP2 with Exchange OWA 5.5 SP4+2 and IIS 5.0
In the past couple of weeks, we have been getting hit VERY hard by SPAM. It
didn't really trip my trigger until I saw one particular NDR in my
postmaster mailbox this morning. Upon opening and looking specifically at
can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Enumeration Question
Ok, here's the situation: Win2k SP2 with Exchange OWA 5.5
SP4+2 and IIS 5.0
In the past couple
-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Enumeration Question
Chris,
1. Not an obvious name.
2. duh It did include an external SMTP addr \duh
However, the DL was
hidden from the GAL
I removed it about 1/2 an hour ago. What every other addy in the org? :o(
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Enumeration Question
Change the SMTP address of the DL. :)
--
, 2002 5:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Enumeration Question
Do not underestimate the power of a dictionary attack. Especially if the
alias of the DL is less than 8 characters long, it is not hard to manage a
brute-force attack.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim
Andy,
By ldap://yourexchangeserver, I'm assuming you mean the name of your OWA
server, correct? Not the name of your BE Exchange server?
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Geez...Had anonymous LDAP access turned on here as well...turned it off.
However, under the Authentication tab, do I want to uncheck the Basic
(Clear Text) and the Basic (Clear Text) using SSL authentication methods?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL
10, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Solicitation
No firewall? Connecting to Ldap://servername could be misleading from where
you are sitting.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Baker
Dave,
Most people on this list are going to tell you that PST = BAD. Server space
is server space, whether it's on the Exchange server, or whether it's on a
member server, and that if you need to keep the messages, you should
increase the mailbox sizes and keep the important messages in the
Hey Dogg,
Got a question on that little NDR thingee...
I implemented that little DL tip as well, when I saw that on the list...and
it IS hidden. Since then, I have gotten an NDR for an employee that left.
Also, directly in the To... list was the name of the new, hidden DL. The DL
has no SMTP
Dr. Dogg!
Yer in Seattle? Cool! If you ever need someone to go to a
Sonics/Mariners/Seachickens game with ya, just let me know...I'm in the
Tri-Cities...Richland to be specific. ;0)
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January
.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
Dr. Dogg
: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
I'm in downtown Seattle, and I trust you'll be seeing Lord of the Rings at
the Cinerama.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Ohlet's not go down this path ok? This is a subject that both sides
take way too personal, way too fast.
-Original Message-
From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: configuration question
Only
Jennifer,
Is that going to work? In his 8:35am post, he clarified that he was using
Ex5.5. Isn't the dsa.msc the Active Directory Users and Computers MMC
snap-in? Wouldn't he be using this only if he was running E2k? Or is Tim
so confused that he doesn't even realize what version of Exchange
, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:12 PM
To: Blunt, James H (Jim); '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
LOL! How did I get in there?
No NDR should be returned if the SMTP alias is typed correctly. And no
error message should
(WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on
Why would you ask privately offline if you were going to take the responses
back to a public forum?
William
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:21 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions
don't want to see the mail bouncing by?
I just sent something. Let me know if you got a copy in postmaster.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High
where you
work.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati on
Ok...I deleted the DL and recreated it, with only the x400
could always make yourself a member, and then see if you still get the NDR.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 13:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL with no Members (WAS) RE: High Physical Memory Utilizati
There's always the Thorazine solution...retrofit the water supply where you
work, so that it's constantly feeding a metered dose of liquid Thorazine to
the user population. They won't care if they have e-mail problems!
Do the Thorazine shuffle!
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar
When mail stops flowing, go to User Manager for Domains and check the
service account. If it's locked out, then you have a permissions issue
somewhere and you probably typed it in icorrectly somewhere or missed typing
it in on a service that is using it.
Either that, or your co-worker was
Rogerio,
If you've got users that are able to open e-mails containing trojans,
transported by various attachment types, then you have a bigger problem.
You either have:
1. No firewall/AV software or
2. Bad firewall/AV software or
3. Poorly configured firewall/AV software.
Plug your security
Folks,
Let's ask a couple of questions, based on the premise of Money isn't an
option:
1. What's the absolute fastest amount of time that it would take to plan an
AD/E2K structure?
2. How long would it take to implement an AD/E2K structure?
3. What kind of hardware do we need to have in
done it millions of times. But the
time extent depends on many, many things.
My Two Cents.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slightly OT
Tuip, Kelly Borndale, Martin Blackstone, Dr.
Dogg, Missy Koslosky, Michèle, Roger Seielstad, Serdar Soysal...
I'd be honored to work with any of these knowledgeable folks.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:11 PM
the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Contracting ADS/E2K Transition
Mike,
Thanks
?)?
Connectivity between servers? Etc...
I think it is a two step process. AD, then E2K. AD should have a disaster
recovery plan in place and tested before the next step.
William
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:00 PM
. Connecting Exchange5.5 using ADC. Then plan E2K. But
that's me.
There's that axiom about: Cheap, Fast, Well done: You get to choose two.
William
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange
using ADC. Then plan E2K. But
that's me.
There's that axiom about: Cheap, Fast, Well done: You get to choose two.
William
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slightly OT
Would a bag of chocolate or a margarita at MEC 2002 take care of that bribe
Darcy? If so, consider that bribe paid in full. I'm gonna need to do the
same thing, sooner or later.
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002
dark chocolate and a Gran Marnier and you've got a deal.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move EXCH 5.5 from one NT domain to another
Would a bag of chocolate
-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move EXCH 5.5 from one NT domain to another
Dove will do, in a pinch. Dilettante is much better, though.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL
will be fine.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move EXCH 5.5 from one NT domain to another
Wow...that's expensive! :0P But a deal is a deal...you may not get as big
a box
preferable to quantity. A truffle or two will be fine.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Move EXCH 5.5 from one NT domain to another
Wow...that's expensive! :0P
Chris,
1. Go to your PF Properties Administration Folder Assistant... Add
Rule...
2. Set up the rule the way you want it to process the e-mail.
I have Win2k SP2 / Ex5.5 SP4+. I have a PF called Overtime Requests.
Anyone that wants to work OT must fill out the OT Request form that I
this but it doesn't give me the option to just send a message to
certain people, I can either reply or forward, not just send, how do I get
this done.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Well sheesh...if that's all you want, go into the properties of the mailbox
and click on the limits tab. In the IS Storage Limits section, uncheck the
Use IS defaults box, check the prohibit send and the the value to 0.
Won't that work just as easily?
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
Oh crud puppies!!!
First, let's take into account here that I'm not the one that set up this
Exchange site...I inherited it from the prior administrator. Second, let's
take into account that I just had TWO molars extracted at the dentist's and
am on more Advil than I can count. Ok...with that
guess here, but still just a guess -
Both IMC's need to be limited to just the appropriate sites. Reconfiguring
yours won't prevent e-mail from your site from going out through their
site's IMC.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
the NDR arose from a user in your department
trying to relay through their server using POP3/IMAP client (both of which
use SMTP to send). The scope you're talking about only deals with who can
send _out_ your IMC.
- Original Message -
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Guys and Gals,
Has anyone ever used a product called Profile Maker 6.1.8? Our Help Desk
wants to save 15 minutes here and there and use this product. From a quick
review, it looks like a total time wasting snafu and could possibly pose a
few security problems.
http://www.autoprof.com/
TIA for
Yes...you are also going to have to have the password for the Exchange
service account handy.
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Boettcher, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Norton AV for Exchange
MS Exchange
How many accounts are we talking here, that you have to do this for?
Don't use a rule. Set up a custom recipient with the outside e-mail addy.
Then have all mail being sent to the mailbox forwarded to an alternate
recipient and pick your new custom recipient.
Jim Blunt
-Original
Two molars pulled out
Good drugs let me sleep last night
Got a lot to do.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: no one send Haiku's on Friday?
Too sleepy today
Baby screamed till
there are many users of a
single computer. Creates profiles on the fly and has been very useful for
us.
Ray Desjardins MCSE NT4.0/Win2k
Manager of Systems Services
Bridgewater State College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Profile Maker???
Because OWA Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: 25 January 2002 20:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Profile Maker???
True.
But several things come into play with my complaint:
1. We don't use user share areas or roaming profiles.
2. We do use .pst files (I know, I
This new virus also drops a back-door trojan...
Here's the information link:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99332.htm
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Alert:
Heya folks,
Is there an electronic version of the Exchange 5.5 book, written by Paul
Robichaux, titled Managing Microsoft Exchange Server, published by
O'Reilly Press? It would be a lot easier to cut and paste sections of
Paul's book into the Documentation section of my Change Request Form,
1 - 100 of 518 matches
Mail list logo
