RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates

[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 12:52 PM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates Reminds me of how Trend Micro reverse-engineered store.exe to hook their AV product into the message

RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates

...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 7:42 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates Great. Never considered they did it that way, that scares me. Another reason

RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates

8:35 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates Backup Exec (and every backup program promising single-item restores) depend on non-public data – they are reverse-engineering the format of a mailbox database.. This is noted

RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates

Sent: Thursday 29 June 2017 13:18 To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates CU5 breaks single item restores in Backup Exec. They are working on it. https://vox.veritas.com/t5/Backup-Exec/Exchange-2016-CU5-Support/td-p/830356

RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates

: Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:35 AM To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates Backup Exec (and every backup program promising single-item restores) depend on non-public data – they are reverse-engineering the format of a mailbox database

RE: [Exchange] June 2017 Quarterly Exchange Updates

CU5 breaks single item restores in Backup Exec. They are working on it. https://vox.veritas.com/t5/Backup-Exec/Exchange-2016-CU5-Support/td-p/830356 From: "Michael B. Smith" To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017